Argument reconstruction: the basics Kareem Khalifa Philosophy Department Middlebury College.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

LOGICAL REASONING Study Unit 5 – eLearning RPK 214.

Advertisements

Truth Functional Logic

Hypotheticals: The If/Then Form Hypothetical arguments are usually more obvious than categorical ones. A hypothetical argument has an “if/then” pattern.

By Don Marquis. According to Marquis, killing a being with a right to life is seriously morally wrong because it robs such a being of its future.

1 Philosophy and Arguments. 2Outline 1 – Arguments: valid vs sound 2. Conditionals 3. Common Forms of Bad Arguments.

Reasoning about Abortion Kareem Khalifa Department of Philosophy Middlebury College.

1 Is Abortion Wrong? II. 2 Thomson’s Project Thomson grants for the sake of argument the premise that a fertilized egg is a person. Thomson challenges.

My Favorite Russian Joke

Refutation, Part 1: Counterexamples & Reductio Kareem Khalifa Philosophy Department Middlebury College.

1 I I Is Pre-Emptive War Wrong?. 2 Phillips’ Central Claim On the principle that just war requires both justice in going to war (jus ad bellum) and justice.

Cultural Relativism : A actions rightness or wrongness depends entirely on the attitudes of the culture a person finds him or herself to be in.

Introduction to Ethics Lecture 16 Thomson’s A Defense of Abortion By David Kelsey.

Other Info on Making Arguments

Deductive Arguments and Inference Rules Terminology: Valid Argument: – truth of the premises guarantees the truth of the conclusion – It would be contradictory.

Existential Introduction Kareem Khalifa Department of Philosophy Middlebury College.

BASIC CONCEPTS OF ARGUMENTS

Conditional Statements & Material Implication Kareem Khalifa Department of Philosophy Middlebury College.

EE1J2 – Discrete Maths Lecture 5 Analysis of arguments (continued) More example proofs Formalisation of arguments in natural language Proof by contradiction.

Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 7 The argument from evil By David Kelsey.

1 Morality, Ethics and Philosophy. 2Definitions Morality: set of beliefs and practices about how to lead a good life Ethics : A rational reflection on.

Knowledge & Faith Dr. Carl J. Wenning Department of Physics Illinois State University.

First Symbolic Exercises

Sinnott-Armstrong & Fogelin (SAF), III.1 Since Chicago is north of Boston, and Boston is north of Charleston, Chicago is north of Charleston. 1.Chicago.

1 Abortion III Abortion. 2 Marquis’ Project Thesis: In the overwhelming majority of cases, deliberate abortions are seriously immoral. Don Marquis: “Why.

Deduction, Induction, & Truth Kareem Khalifa Department of Philosophy Middlebury College.

Logic and Philosophy Alan Hausman PART ONE Sentential Logic Sentential Logic.

0 Validity & Invalidity (Exercises) December 23, 2005.

Thomson on Abortion. Two old arguments All human beings have a right to life The fetus is clearly human Therefore the fetus has a right to life and abortion.

Philosophy 1050: Introduction to Philosophy Week 10: Descartes and the Subject: The way of Ideas.

Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 5 The Ontological Argument By David Kelsey.

The Science of Good Reasons

1 Is Abortion Wrong? III. 2 Brody’s Project Brody argues that, given Thomson’s presumption that the squidge has a full right to life, her argument that.

Truth Tables and Validity Kareem Khalifa Department of Philosophy Middlebury College pqrSp v qr & s~(p v q)~p~q~p & ~q~(p v q) -> (r & s) (~p & ~q) ->

Logic in Everyday Life.

Reasoning and Critical Thinking Validity and Soundness 1.

Defending the premises The key to a successful argument.

Validity and Counterexamples Kareem Khalifa Department of Philosophy Middlebury College.

Why Abortion is Immoral

1 The Morality of Abortion Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana.

Hypothetical Derivations Kareem Khalifa Department of Philosophy Middlebury College.

0 Validity & Invalidity (Exercises) All dogs have two heads. 2. All tigers are dogs. ___________________________________ 3. All tigers have two.

Why Does Anything at all Exist? Why is there something rather than nothing? Leibniz - the principle of sufficient reason.

Philosophy: Logic and Logical arguments

Proof of Invalidity Kareem Khalifa Department of Philosophy Middlebury College.

Thinking Mathematically Arguments and Truth Tables.

Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 7 The argument from evil By David Kelsey.

Central Argument The central argument is whether or not the unborn are fully human or not.

Sentence (syntactically Independent grammatical unit) QuestionCommandStatement “This is a class in logic.” “I enjoy logic.” “Today is Friday.”

The Language of Arguments Kareem Khalifa Department of Philosophy Middlebury College.

ETHICS: The study of proper behavior, broadly construed. What is the good life? What duties do I have to myself and others? What does good moral reasoning.

 Defendant may present evidence to show that › No criminal act was committed  Example: a person was carrying a gun but had a valid license › No criminal.

Ethics Review Via the Euthyphro. What does Euthyphro think? What position would this be? Suppose Socrates asks only because he thinks piety is whatever.

PHILOSOPHY OF LANGUAGE Some topics and historical issues of the 20 th century.

Chapter 9: Abortion Pope John Paul II, “The Unspeakable Crime of Abortion” – Main argument: 1. The human fetus from conception is “an innocent human being.”

Chapter III Evaluating Arguments. Nondeductive Arguments Most common kinds of arguments Successful arguments are a matter of degree. Deal with likelihood.

The Problem of the External World Kareem Khalifa Philosophy Department Middlebury College.

a valid argument with true premises.

Disjunctive Syllogism

Chapter 3 Philosophy: Questions and theories

Today’s Outline Discussion of Exercise VI on page 39.

Evaluating truth tables

Discrete Mathematics Lecture # 8.

Validity and Counterexamples

Arguments, arguments, and more arguments

Phil2303 intro to logic.

SUMMARY Logic and Reasoning.

If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.

If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.

Tooley’s Abortion and Infanticide

Presentation transcript:

Argument reconstruction: the basics Kareem Khalifa Philosophy Department Middlebury College

Sinnott-Armstrong & Fogelin (SAF), III.1 Since Chicago is north of Boston, and Boston is north of Charleston, Chicago is north of Charleston. 1.Chicago is north of Boston. 2.Boston is north of Charleston. 3.  Chicago is north of Charleston. (from 1,2)

SAF, III.5 Other airlines will carry more passengers, because United Airlines is on strike. 1.United Airlines is on strike. 2.  Other airlines will carry more passengers. (From 1)

SAF, III.5, made valid 1.If United Airlines is on strike, then other airlines will carry more passengers. 2.United Airlines is on strike. 3.  Other airlines will carry more passengers. (From 1,2)

Exercise 1 No plants are sentient. All morally considerable things are sentient.  No plants are morally considerable. VALID.

Exercise 2 All mathematical truths are knowable. All mathematical truths are eternal.  All that is knowable is eternal. INVALID. Suppose there is something knowable that is not a mathematical truth and that is not eternal, e.g., that I am experiencing a headache. Then it could still be the case that all mathematical truths are knowable and eternal, but that something knowable is not eternal.

Exercise 3 Most geniuses have been close to madness. Blake was a genius.  Blake was close to madness. INVALID. Suppose that Blake was one of the few geniuses that was well-adjusted. Then it could still be the case that most geniuses have been close to madness and Blake was a genius, but that Blake was nevertheless not close to madness.

Exercise 6 Some angels are fallen.  Some angels are not fallen. INVALID. Suppose that all angels are fallen. Then it would still be the case that some angels are fallen, but nevertheless not be the case that some angels are not fallen.

Exercise 7 To know something is to be certain of it. We cannot be certain of anything.  We cannot know anything. VALID.

Innocence Argument: 1 st Pass 1*)It is always morally wrong to kill an innocent human being. 2) Abortion involves killing a human fetus. 3) A human fetus is a human being. 4*)A human fetus is innocent. 5)  Abortion is always morally wrong.

What’s wrong with Premise (1*)? Some mentally ill people threaten the lives of others. In such cases, mentally ill people are innocent. It is not morally wrong to kill such people in self-defense. So (1*) is false: It is not always morally wrong to kill an innocent human being.

Innocence Argument, Revised (1**) It is always morally wrong to kill an innocent human being, except in self- defense. 2) Abortion involves killing a human fetus. 3) A human fetus is a human being. 4*)A human fetus is innocent. 5)  Abortion is always morally wrong. 5*)  Abortion is always morally wrong, except in the case of self-defense. 5*)  Abortion is always morally wrong, except in the case of self-defense.

The triangulation process Formulate an initial, valid argument. Look for weaknesses in your premises, ex. (1*) Revise your premises to make them more plausible – Ex. (1**) Introduce the revised premises into your initial argument. If the new premises render the argument invalid, alter your conclusion (and other premises) accordingly – Ex. (5*) Thus, thinking logically can make you revise your opinions.

Where to challenge the Innocence Argument (1**) It is always morally wrong to kill an innocent human being, except in self- defense. 2) Abortion involves killing a human fetus. 3) A human fetus is a human being. 4*)A human fetus is innocent. 5)  Abortion is always morally wrong. 5*)  Abortion is always morally wrong, except in the case of self-defense. 5*)  Abortion is always morally wrong, except in the case of self-defense.

Exercise 10 The witnesses said that either one or two shots were fired at the victim. Two bullets were found in the victim’s body.  Two shots were fired at the victim. INVALID. Suppose that one shot was fired at the victim, and another was the victim’s own bullet that struck him due to a misfire of his gun. Then it could still be the case that the witnesses said that either one or two shots were fired at the victim, two bullets were found in the victim’s body, but two shots were not fired at the victim.

Exercise 14 DNA contains the code of life. Life is sacred.  It is wrong to manipulate DNA. INVALID. Suppose that it is proper to manipulate certain sacred things, as we do when we build or fix an altar. Then it could still be the case that DNA contains the code of life and that life is sacred, but that it is correct to manipulate DNA. ALTERNATIVELY, suppose that, because DNA contains the code of life, manipulating it is the way to preserve the sacredness of life, e.g., by saving people from hereditary diseases.