MICE Detector Integration A. Bross Mice Video Meeting August 27, 2003
MICE Detector Integration Although the issues surrounding MICE detector integration are simpler than those for the absorbers, focusing, and solenoid coils, there are a number of issues that require careful consideration u Safety s Electrical, HV, gas flammability u Services s Power s Cooling u Radiation Shielding from cavity conditioning The main concern is related to the tracker since the up and downstream detectors can be decoupled from the cooling channel. u Safety, of course, still has to be maintained and services for these detectors are still an issue
MICE Detector Integration What needs to be studied is quite different for the two tracking options that are being considered. u TPG s Has active components in or near solenoid –Stored energy in TPC (½C(50,000) 2 ) HV insulation –Preamp Power Ignition source May require cooling s Is intrinsically Rad Hard –May not need shielding from cavities during commissioning u Fiber Tracker s Is intrinsically safe –No active components in channel s Not intrinsically Rad Hard –May need shielding Ed Black has conceptual design using commercial vacuum gate valves – promising and not too expensive!
MICE Detector Integration Both require floor space near cooling channel for electronics and cryo(FT). Critical issues u TPG s Analysis of Stored energy and HV insulation. –Ignition source vz a vz H safety? s Preamp power –Ignition source vz a vz H safety? u FT s Available space for cryostat –Defines fiber waveguide lengths and thus final light yield All Detectors: u List of required services u Ruling from RAL safety which electrical systems must conform to H safety rules.