The StarNet Case Control Study Investigating the Effects of Genes and Environment on Smoking Behavior.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 © 2009 University of Wisconsin-Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Human Subjects Protection (HSP)
Advertisements

Making Sense of the Social World 4th Edition
Behavioral Research Chapter Three Ethical Research.
THE ETHICS OF HUMAN PARTICIPANT RESEARCH Office for Research Protections The Pennsylvania State University.
IRB BASICS: Ethics and Human Subject Protections
DO NO HARM IRRB Presentation Purposes Responsibilities Processes NLU IRRB Home page.
Ethical Guidelines for Research with Human Participants
Detectives in the Classroom - Investigation 2-3: What's Wrong with This Picture? What's Wrong with This Picture?
© HRP Associates, Inc. Ethics & Regulation of Human Subjects Research Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D., CIP President, HRP Associates, Inc.
8 Criteria for IRB Approval of Research 45 CFR (a)
Ethical Treatment of Participants in Studies of Online Behaviors Barbara M. Wildemuth School of Information & Library Science University of North Carolina.
Ethical Issues in Research
Human Subject Research Ethics
Human Subject Research by Students at William Paterson University March 2015.
Human Subject Research by Students at William Paterson University May 2011.
Educational Research and the VCOM Institutional Review Board
Idara C.E.. Three ethical principles guides research with human participants. principle of Autonomy 1. The principle of Autonomy requires investigators.
Psychology 291 – Lab 4 Ethics October 9, 2012
The Goals and Principles of Human Participant Protection Part 4: Vulnerable Populations.
What is your Acronym IQ? ASC DOC DOS FYS SACS NEH NIH OSHA IRB TGIF.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) for Human Subject Protections: Working with the IRB Erin McClure, PhD Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.
 The WP IRB is concerned with Social- Behavioral and Biomedical research that is: A systematic investigation Designed to develop or contribute to generalizable.
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD HISTORY AND ETHICS. 2 Ethical History : Holocaust : Nuremburg Trials 1964: Declaration of Helsinki :
RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH MARGARITA M. CARDONA DIRECTOR OF SPONSORED RESEARCH Institutional Review Board.
University of North Carolina at Greensboro Protecting Research Participants.
Chapter 18 Ethical Precautions in Music Therapy Research.
The Institutional Review Board: A Community College Toolkit Dr. Geri J Anderson.
 The IRB: Why, what and how  Core Concerns: Subject selection, subject consent to participate, confidentiality  IRB Protocol Forms  Contact Information.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
“ Research with human subjects ” SUA IRB Committee OrientationIRB Committee.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) What is our Purpose and Role for Ethical Research.
Human Subject Protection Research Imperatives. History World War II - Nuremberg Tuskegee Study Belmont Report Modern Problems - Inadequacy of “Good Intentions”
Institutional Review Board Protecting Human Research Subjects.
Dustin Yocum, MA Institutional Review Board University of Illinois HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH.
Ethics Ethics Applied to Research Back to Class 2.
PA Profession ETHICS COMMITTEE RIGHT TO REFUSE TREATMENT Salvatore Barese, PA-C.
ETHICS OF NEONATAL RESEARCH John L. Sever, MD, PhD. Children’s National Medical Center George Washington University Medical Center Washington, DC.
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
TUN IRB: The Basics February 26, IRB Function Review human-subject research Ensure the rights & welfare of human subjects are adequately protected.
What Institutional Researchers Should Know about the IRB Susan Thompson Senior Research Analyst Office of Institutional Research Presented at the Texas.
$100 $200 $400 $500 $300 $100 $200 $400 $500 $300 $100 $200 $400 $500 $300 $100 $200 $400 $500 $300 $100 $200 $400 $500 $300 Terms Clinical Trial Facts.
WELCOME to the TULANE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION OFFICE WORKSHOP for SOCIAL/BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (March 2, 2010) Tulane University HRPO Uptown.
Idara C.E.. Three ethical principles guides research with human participants. principle of Autonomy 1. The principle of Autonomy requires investigators.
Chapter 10 Research in the Schools: Ethical-Legal Issues Jacob, Decker, & Hartshorne 1.
Protection of Human Research Subjects Theresia Yiallourou Nora Leonardi Ulrike Kettenberger November 19 th 2010.
Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research. Historical Perspective on Ethics Nazi Experimentation in WWII –“medical experiments” –Nuremberg War Crime Trials.
Pediatric Research Ethics and the Research Subject Advocate Tomas Jose Silber, MD, MASS RSA and Director, Office of Ethics, CNMC Professor of Pediatrics,
Chapter 2: Ethical Issues in Program Evaluation. Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) Federal mandate for IRBs –Concern during 1970s about unethical research.
Doing IRB Right … Together JOHN POTTER, OD, MA Chair, Institutional Review Board.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) for Human Subject Protections: Working with the IRB Erin A McClure, PhD Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.
 Empowered by the University to insure we are in compliance with Federal regulations  Guided by the standards in the Belmont Report and regulations.
Investigator Initiated Research Best Practices for IRB: SBER Corey Zolondek, Ph.D. IRB Operations Manager Wayne State University.
Susan Sonne, PharmD, BCPP Chair, MUSC IRB II
Back to Basics – Approval Criteria
Class 9 Jeff Driskell, MSW, PhD
IRB BASICS Ethics and Human Subject Protections Summer 2016
Ethical Dilemma Research that is most likely to reveal something important about human nature is also the most likely to violate human rights. A number.
Ethics in Social Psychology
5/26/2018 Human Subject Research at William Paterson University February
Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D. CIP President HRP Associates, Inc.
© 2016 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Introduction to the Institutional Review Board
IRB BASICS: Ethics and Human Subject Protections
Investigator Responsibilities: What should we expect from researchers?
Intro to Projects – Research with Human Subjects
Ethics Review Morals: Rules that define what is right and wrong Ethics: process of examining moral standards and looking at how we should interpret and.
2/23/2019 Human Subject Research at William Paterson University February
Human Participants Research
Research, Experimentation, & Clinical Trials
Office of Research Integrity and Protections
Presentation transcript:

The StarNet Case Control Study Investigating the Effects of Genes and Environment on Smoking Behavior

Overview of Research Study Phase 1: Designing the StarNet Case Control Study Phase 2: Recruiting subjects; collecting DNA and questionnaire data from them; genotyping subjects’ DNA; entering data into a database Phase 3: Analyzing data

The StarNet Study Phase 1: Designing the Study Study design includes: Research question Outcome and exposures Study population Research questionnaire

Research Question: What genetic and environmental exposures are associated with people moving from smoking initiation to maintenance? Cases are people who initiated smoking and became smokers. Controls are people who initiated smoking but never became smokers. Cases Controls Non-smokers never smoked, or tried smoking but did not continue 1. Initiation 2. Maintenance 3. Cessation 4. Relapse Former smokers successful quitters Stages of Smoking Experimental smokers Regular smokers

Outcome and Exposures Outcome: Moving from smoking initiation to maintenance Exposures: Several environmental factors and a few genes involved in the reward pathway or nicotine metabolism Subjects will be genotyped for a few candidate genes Subjects will complete a questionnaire that asks about environmental factors

Our Study Population subjects Both men and women Different ethnicities Age 25 to 54

Questionnaire Design What do we want to know? Demographic questions Smoking habit Environmental exposures

Progress on Phase 1 Study design was completed in 2007 Study has been approved by UW IRB What is the UW IRB? Why do we need approval?

Protection of Human Subjects The Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for research on human subjects The Common Rule: Federal regulations for human subjects research (based on the Belmont Report)

The Belmont Report Autonomy (respect for persons) Beneficence/non-maleficence (Do good; maximize benefits and minimize harms) Justice (Be fair)

Autonomy Research subjects have the right to decide whether to participate in a study Minors or people with limited capacity represented by a responsible guardian informed consent/assent People should not be coerced into participating and should not receive undue influence

Beneficence/Non-maleficence For each study, researchers need to minimize risks to research subjects while maximizing benefits of the study As a community, researchers needs to consider the long term benefits and risks from a field of study or from the development of a medical procedure

Justice Benefits and burdens of the study are fairly distributed Vulnerable populations do not bear an unfair burden of research

How Does the StarNet Study Meet the Ethical Guidelines of the Belmont Report? Autonomy Competent adults Give informed consent Small cash compensation Beneficence/Non-maleficence Potential risks: discomfort with some questions, blood draw, or revealing genetic information Benefits: improving education and our understanding of factors affecting smoking behavior Justice Diverse subject population Competent adult subjects who volunteer

The StarNet Study Phase 2: Recruitment and Genotyping Subjects are being recruited from around Puget Sound Subjects call the study coordinator, who screens each caller to determine whether they are eligible for the study as a case or a control

Meeting a Subject Eligible subjects: meet the study coordinator in a private office read consent form, have opportunity to ask questions sign consent form if interested in participating in study Fill out questionnaire, give blood sample

DNA Preparation and Genotyping Lab purifies DNA from the subjects’ blood samples StarNet lab uses PCR to amplify regions of subjects’ DNA StarNet team sends equipment, reagents, and PCR- amplified DNA to classrooms for genotyping High school students genotype the subjects’ DNA and send results back to StarNet The StarNet team enter genotyping data and environmental data from questionnaire into a queriable database.

The StarNet Study Phase 3: Data Analysis The database is a source of data for original research Students propose hypotheses about smoking behavior, and use the database to test them Students will share their discoveries with the StarNet team and with other classrooms

Case Studies Read one of the four case studies. Decide whether a human subjects violation has occurred. If so, recommend what should be done to improve the study or decide whether the study should be terminated.