1. Effective PATH Program: Draft Criteria and Proposed Outcomes C. H. “Hank” Balderrama, Washington State PATH Contact Monica Bellamy, Michigan State PATH Contact Administrative Workgroup Co-Chairs

2. Overview Role of Administrative Workgroup Genesis of Effective PATH Program Development of Draft Criteria and Outcomes Obtaining Input

3. Administrative Workgroup Role Provide administrative guidance to the National PATH program

4. W hat does an effective PATH program look like ?

5. Obtaining Input

7. Effective PATH Program Draft Document Column A: Criteria Column B: Voluntary Outcome Measures Column C: GPRA Measures Column D: Recommended Outcome Measures

8. Instructions Identify recorder. Review item assigned to your table, e.g. Outreach Discuss the criteria identified for the item Add, edit or delete criteria as determined by the group Discuss the performance measures identified for the item Add, edit or delete performance measures as determined by the group

9. Next Steps Review and incorporate your comments Update Effective PATH Program Criteria Send back out on SPC listserv for review and comment Complete by Spring 2011