Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Segil JL, Controzzi M, Weir RF, Cipriani C. Comparative study of state-of- the-art.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Segil JL, Controzzi M, Weir RF, Cipriani C. Comparative study of state-of- the-art."— Presentation transcript:

1 This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Segil JL, Controzzi M, Weir RF, Cipriani C. Comparative study of state-of- the-art myoelectric controllers for multigrasp prosthetic hands. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51(9):1439–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2014.01.0014 Slideshow Project DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2014.01.0014JSP Comparative study of state-of-the-art myoelectric controllers for multigrasp prosthetic hands Jacob L. Segil, MS; Marco Controzzi, PhD; Richard F. ff. Weir, PhD; Christian Cipriani, PhD

2 This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Segil JL, Controzzi M, Weir RF, Cipriani C. Comparative study of state-of- the-art myoelectric controllers for multigrasp prosthetic hands. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51(9):1439–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2014.01.0014 Slideshow Project DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2014.01.0014JSP Aim – Conduct comparative study of 2 finite state machines and a postural control scheme using virtual and physical assessment procedures. Relevance – Myoelectric controller should provide intuitive and effective human-machine interface that deciphers user intent in real-time and is robust enough to operate in daily life.

3 This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Segil JL, Controzzi M, Weir RF, Cipriani C. Comparative study of state-of- the-art myoelectric controllers for multigrasp prosthetic hands. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51(9):1439–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2014.01.0014 Slideshow Project DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2014.01.0014JSP Method 7 nondisabled subjects. Used Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP) to compare effectiveness of controllers during activities of daily living using multigrasp artificial hand. Used virtual hand posture matching task to compare controllers when reproducing 6 target postures.

4 This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Segil JL, Controzzi M, Weir RF, Cipriani C. Comparative study of state-of- the-art myoelectric controllers for multigrasp prosthetic hands. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51(9):1439–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2014.01.0014 Slideshow Project DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2014.01.0014JSP Results Performance when using postural control scheme was significantly better than when using finite state machines during physical assessment when comparing within-subject averages using SHAP % difference metric. Virtual assessment described significantly greater completion rates for finite state machines, but movement time tended to be faster for postural control scheme.

5 This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Segil JL, Controzzi M, Weir RF, Cipriani C. Comparative study of state-of- the-art myoelectric controllers for multigrasp prosthetic hands. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51(9):1439–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2014.01.0014 Slideshow Project DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2014.01.0014JSP Conclusion Our results substantiate that postural control schemes rival other state-of-the-art myoelectric controllers.


Download ppt "This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Segil JL, Controzzi M, Weir RF, Cipriani C. Comparative study of state-of- the-art."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google