1. Jessica Bigham, Kevin Farley, Chris Mitchell, Morgan Oster

2. Design Process  Customer Needs  Conceptualization Literature and Patent Searches Benchmarking Product Dissection  Revise and Redesign  Concept Selection  Detail Design

3. Project Managment TaskDate StartedDate FinishedDays NeededSlack StartOct. 23 00 Project ManagementOct. 23Oct. 2410 Customer NeedsOct. 24Oct. 2620 External SearchOct. 26 00 Internal SearchOct. 26Nov. 11160 Literature SearchesOct. 26Nov. 11160 Patent SearchesOct. 26Oct. 30412 BenchmarkingOct. 26Nov. 11160 Generate IdeasNov. 11Nov. 1430 Preliminary DesignNov. 14Nov. 1730 Test preliminary designNov. 17Nov. 2140 Revise IdeasNov. 21Nov. 2210 Select DesignNov. 22 00 Detailed DesignsNov. 22Nov. 2530 ReportNov. 25Dec. 490 PowerpointNov. 25Nov. 3054 Visuals for PresentationNov. 25Nov. 3054 PracticeDec. 4Dec. 730 Final TouchesDec. 7Dec. 920 Project DueDec. 9 00

4. Customer Needs 1. Eco-Friendly (0.23,0.23) 1.1 Use solar panels for electricity (0.077, 0.33) 1.2 Use sunlight to heat house and water (0.077, 0.33) 1.3 Cool house efficiently (0.077, 0.33) 2. Appearance of house (0.21,0.21) 2.1 Reasonable amount of windows (0.07, 0.33) 2.2 Size of window (0.07, 0.33) 2.3 Pleasing to the eye (0.07, 0.33) 3. Safety (0.51, 0.51) 3.1 Low maintenance (0.51, 0.51) 4. Inexpensive (0.05, 0.05)

5. Revised Problem Statement  Our target population is homeowners looking to save energy through daylighting  Use natural sources to light and heat a house without releasing heat in winter and retaining heat in the summer.

6. Concepts  For our concepts we focused particularly on the windows and how we could light the house better and make it more eye pleasing

7. Concepts  Shade vs. Tint vs. Nothing  Plants indoor vs. Plant outdoors  Glass vs. Plastic  One pane vs. Two pane  Screen vs. No screen  Opening up vs. Opening out

8. Criteria for Selection  Safety  Expense  Amount of light coming in  Heat efficient  Pleasing to the eye

9. Bill of Materials  Each garden window is $514 48x36x12 There are five total  Top skylight Made up of ten 21 1/2 x 46 3/8 in Safety glass $202 each  Skylight on the side it tinted  Total cost of all windows is $4,590  Low-E2, Argon Gas Filled Comfortplus Glass

10. Comfortplus glass Comfortplus glass features a double- layer of low-E coating for increased energy efficiency plus a laminated pane for added safety and protection from fade-causing UV rays

11. Sketch of Final Design

12. Sketch of Design (side)

13. Sketch of Design (top)

14. Engineering Analysis  Reduced energy costs  Windows allow enough light to come in  Safe  Money saved over time will surpass the cost for the windows

15. Conclusions  Meets problem statement requests  Meets all customer needs