1. Federal and State Student Accountability Data Update Testing Coordinators Meeting Local District 8 09/29/09 1

2. 2 Accountability Systems Federal –No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 Defines NCLB mandates for Title I schools failing to meet proficiency target Requires all students to perform at or above proficiency by 2014 in English Language Arts and Math State –SB 1X: Public Schools Accountability Act 1999 –Academic Performance Index LACOE/LAUSD Fall 20092/5/2016

3. 3 Federal Testing Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) No Child Left Behind

4. 4 4 Federal Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) 1.Participation Rate 2.Minimum Proficiency Rates or Annual Measurable Objectives (AMO) 3.Minimum Academic Performance Index (API) [680] 4.Minimum Graduation Rate [83.1% or +.1%] Curricular Areas: Language Arts and Math LACOE/LAUSD2/5/2016

5. CAHSEE Proficiency English Language Arts: 380 Scaled Score –97% Ninth and Tenth Grade Standards Mathematics: 380 Scaled Score –85% 6th, 7th and Grade Standards 5

6. 6 AYP Criteria High School Level: Annual Measurable Objectives (AMO) 2.Testing Proficiency (AMO): English Language Arts Mathematics 2007- 2008 2008- 2009 2009- 2010 2010- 2011 2007- 2008 2008- 2009 2009- 2010 2010- 2011 CAHSEE 33.4%44.5%55.6%66.7%32.2%43.5%54.8%66.1%

7. Alternate Way of Meeting Proficiency Safe Harbor 7

8. 8 An LEA, school, or subgroup must show a decrease in the percentage of students below proficient by 10% over the prior year to qualify for Safe Harbor http://www.cde.ca.gov/

9. 9 Safe Harbor Option Becomes an option to meet AYP proficiency when the gap between the new AMO and the current level of proficiency is greater than 10% New Annual Measurable Objective (AMO) [55.6 ELA/54.8 Math] Gap Greater than 10% Current Proficiency (School wide or Subgroup)

10. ELA 10 th Grade CAHSEE Percent Proficient 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% EL Subgroup Spring 2009 78.9% Non-Proficient 21.1% Proficient EL Subgroup Safe Harbor Target Spring 2010 71.11% Non-Proficient 28.99% Safe Harbor Proficiency Rate for EL Subgroup EL Subgroup AMO Target Spring 2010 55.5% Non-Proficient 55.6% Proficient Senior High School Proficient equals a scale score of 380 or above 10

11. Calculating Estimated Safe Harbor 11

12. 12 State Testing Accountability Academic Performance Index (API) Senate Bill 1X [SB1X]

13. High School API Participation Rate: 85% participation rate must be met in California Standards Tests (CST) Grade Level Exams: ELA Grades 9,10, and 11 US History Grade 11 Life Science Grade 10 13

14. Failure to Meet the 85% Participation Rate: No Academic Performance Index (API) for the next school year 14

15. High School: The Big Six API Component Breakdown 15

16. 1.ELA grade level CST(9-11): 27.1% 2.Math EOC CST: 18.1% 3.Science CSTs 1.Life Science 10 grade level CST 2.EOC Grade 9-11: 22.9% 4.History CSTs 1.US History 11 grade level CST 2.EOC Grades 10-11: 13.9% 5.CAHSEE ELA : 9% 6.CAHSEE Math: 9% 16

17. Calculating API Key to Understanding API Growth

18. Wade Hayashida LD8 LAUSD GradePoints A4 B3 C2 D1 Fail0 Calculating Grade Point Average

19. Wade Hayashida LD8 LAUSD CreditsGradePoints English= 3A4 Algebra= 3B3 History= 3C2 Chemistry= 3D1 PE =3Fail0 Calculating Grade Point Average

20. Wade Hayashida LD8 LAUSD CreditsGradePoints Credits X Points 3A412 3B39 3C26 3D13 3Fail00 Total Credits 15 Total grade points=30 Calculating Grade Point Average

21. Wade Hayashida LD8 LAUSD 30 grade points 15 credits Equals 2.0 GPA

22. QuintileAPI Weight Advanced1000 Proficient875 Basic700 Below Basic500 Far Below Basic 200 Academic Performance Index (API) CST Quintile Rankings paired with API Weights 2/5/201622LACOE/LAUSD

23. # StudentsQuintileAPI Weights# Students X API Weight Advanced 1000 Proficient 875 Basic 700 Below Basic 500 Far Below Basic 200 Total Students Total weighted pts Calculating Academic Performance Index 2/5/201623LACOE/LAUSD

24. # StudentsQuintileAPI Weights# Students X API Weight 100 Advanced 1000100,000 100 Proficient 87587,500 100 Basic 70070,000 100 Below Basic 50050,000 100 Far Below Basic 20020,000 500 Total Students 327,500 Total weighted pts. Sample API Calculation: Same number of students in each quintile level. 2/5/201624LACOE/LAUSD

25. 327,500 Total weighted pts. 500 Total # of Students Equals 655 API

26. QuintileAPI Weight Highest API: 1000 Advanced1000 State API Goal: 800 Proficient875 Basic700 Below Basic500 Lowest API: 200 Far Below Basic 200 Academic Performance Index (API) Highest Possible API/State API Goal/Lowest Possible API 2/5/201626LACOE/LAUSD

27. QuintileAPI Weight Change in API Weight Advanced1000125 Proficient875175 Basic700200 Below Basic500300 Far Below Basic200N/A Academic Performance Index (API): Change in API Weights 2/5/201627LACOE/LAUSD

28. Academic Performance Index (API) and CST Performance Levels Far Below BasicBelow BasicBasicProficientAdvanced 150 to 268269 to 299300 to 349350 to 392393 to 600 API For Academic Performance Index (API), greatest gains will occur when moving students from the lowest CST levels due to weighting factors. API 2/5/201628

29. # StudentsQuintileAPI Weights# Students X API Weight 120 Advanced 1000120,000 80 Proficient 87570,000 100 Basic 70070,000 100 Below Basic 50050,000 100 Far Below Basic 20020,000 500 Total Students 330,000 Total weighted pts. Sample API Calculation: Moving 20 students from Proficient to Advanced 2/5/201629LACOE/LAUSD

30. 330,000 Total weighted pts. 500 Total # of Students Equals 660 API [655+5 gain]

31. # StudentsQuintileAPI Weights# Students X API Weight 100 Advanced 1000100,000 100 Proficient 87587,500 100 Basic 70070,000 120 Below Basic 50060,000 80 Far Below Basic 20016,000 500 Total Students 333,500 Total weighted pts. Sample API Calculation: Moving 20 students from Far Below Basic to Below Basic 2/5/201631LACOE/LAUSD

32. 333,500 Total weighted pts. 500 Total # of Students Equals 667 API [655 +12 gain]

33. 33 “LEAKAGE” Hidden Loss of API Points LACOE/LAUSD2/5/2016

34. # StudentsQuintileAPI Weights# Students X API Weight 80 Advanced 100080,000 100 Proficient 87587,500 120 Basic 70084,000 120 Below Basic 50060,000 80 Far Below Basic 20016,000 500 Total Students 327,500 Total weighted pts. Sample API Calculation: 20 students falling from Advanced to Basic 20 students advancing from Far Below Basic to Below Basic 2/5/201634 Hayashida/Keith

35. 327,500 Total weighted pts. 500 Total # of Students equals 655 API [0 growth]

36. Wade Hayashida LD8 LAUSD Scaled ScoreAPI Weight Pass3501000 XXX FailBelow 350200 Academic Performance Index (API) Criteria: CAHSEE Weighting

37. 37 Key to Meeting Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Generating Academic Performance Index (API): Positive Annual Gains 37 LACOE/LAUSD Fall 20092/5/2016

38. 38 Goal: Advance One Testing Level Per Year regardless of assessed level. Far Below BasicBelow BasicBasicProficientAdvanced 150 to 268269 to 299300 to 349350 to 392393 to 600 LACOE/LAUSD Fall 20092/5/2016

39. Local District 8 Title I Website 2/5/2016LACOE/LAUSD Fall 200939 http://www.lausd.k12.ca.us/District_8/title1.htm

40. Wade Hayashida, PI Coordinator Local District 8 wade.hayashida@lausd.net 310-354-3459 2/5/201640LACOE/LAUSD Fall 2009