Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Classroom Technology Supplemental Proposal #1 Presentation to the UTFAB Monday, February 26, 2007, 4-5 PM, Weber 202 Andre’ Smith - Associate Director/Chief.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Classroom Technology Supplemental Proposal #1 Presentation to the UTFAB Monday, February 26, 2007, 4-5 PM, Weber 202 Andre’ Smith - Associate Director/Chief."— Presentation transcript:

1 Classroom Technology Supplemental Proposal #1 Presentation to the UTFAB Monday, February 26, 2007, 4-5 PM, Weber 202 Andre’ Smith - Associate Director/Chief Engineer Classroom Support Services-ACNS, Andre.Smith@Colostate.edu, ext. 1-6035 Andre.Smith@Colostate.edu

2 2Classroom Technology ProposalFeb. 26, 2007 Outline Supplemental Proposal for FY 08 Document Cameras Begin Technology Refresh of SMART Classroom Document Cameras on 5-year replacement cycle Projector Lifts Technology Upgrade of SMART Classroom Data Projector Lifts Budget Summary Analysis – “fit” with UTFAB funding criteria Q&A

3 3Classroom Technology ProposalFeb. 26, 2007 Proposed Document Camera Refresh to Begin 5-year Cycle BuildingRoomCapacityBuildingRoomCapacity AnazoW118143ClarkC24868 ArtF10197ClarkC25170 ArtF10352Eddy760 AylesworthC111164Eddy860 ChemistryA101158Eddy100 ClarkA101386Guggenheim10770 ClarkA102208Natural Resources113147 ClarkA103174Plant SciencesC101300 ClarkA104208

4 4Classroom Technology ProposalFeb. 26, 2007 Proposed Technology Upgrades – Projector Lifts BuildingRoomCapacity AnazoW118143 ArtsF10197 ArtsF10352 ClarkA203123 ClarkA204123 Guggenheim10770 Natural Resources10951 Natural Resources113147 Rockwell (x2)16545

5 5Classroom Technology ProposalFeb. 26, 2007 Budget for Document Camera Upgrades

6 6Classroom Technology ProposalFeb. 26, 2007 Summary To catch up, and establish a regular replacement cycle for document cameras FYRefresh Doc Cams New Lifts 07/081710

7 7Classroom Technology ProposalFeb. 26, 2007 UTFAB Funding Criteria 1. Benefit as many students as possibleAlmost all students at CSU will benefit. 2. Ability to effectively utilize the feeYour decision. 3. Not funded by CFTIt is not. 4. Adherence to budget and accountabilityYour decision. 5. Potential for direct student useAbsolutely. 6. Effort, thought & clarity in the planYour decision. 7. Quantitative usage dataA lot. 8. Financial co-sponsorshipOngoing support by CSS. 9. Central/distributed balanceNot applicable to this project. 10. Cost/benefit ratioYour decision.

8 8Classroom Technology ProposalFeb. 26, 2007 Thank You For your continued support!

9 9Classroom Technology ProposalFeb. 26, 2007 Discussion and Questions Are most welcome.


Download ppt "Classroom Technology Supplemental Proposal #1 Presentation to the UTFAB Monday, February 26, 2007, 4-5 PM, Weber 202 Andre’ Smith - Associate Director/Chief."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google