1. 9/11, the perfect crime
Michael Berry

3. What they want us to believe:
19 hijackers, directed by Osama B. Ladin, took over 4 commercial Jets with box cutters and knives, and while evading the air defense system (NORAD), hit their intended targets. In turn, trade towers 1, 2, and 7 collapsed due to structural failure through fire in a pancake fashion, while the plane that hit the pentagon vaporized upon impact. The 9/11 Commission found that there were no warnings for this act of terrorism, while multiple government failures prevented adequate defense.

4. “We could have never anticipated these attacks”
The president was aware that bin Laden, of course, as previous administrations have well known, that bin Laden was determined to strike the United States. In fact, the label on the president's (presidential daily briefing) was 'Bin Laden Determined to Strike the United States,'" White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer said Friday.  – fox news (august 2001)
Egyptian President Mubarak through his intelligence services warns the US that bin Laden's Islamic terrorist network is threatening to kill Bush and other G8 leaders at their July economic summit meeting in Italy. The terrorists plan to use a plane stuffed with explosives. [NY Times] (july 2001)

5. Don’t warnings refute talk of conspiracy?
It can be argued that although these warnings bring about discrepancies in the official story, they also provide justification for blame.
Had warning signs of Bin Laden’s plan to destroy the Twin Towers and the Pentagon not been exposed prior to the attacks, they would not have the strong premises that help lead to the official story’s conclusion.

6. Hijackers arrive at airports & board flights
Hijackers Mohamed Atta and Abdulaziz Alomari board a Colgan Air flight from Portland, Maine, to Boston. They are filmed going through security in Portland. This is the only footage of the hijackers in airports on 9/11, and it's not even one of the suicide flights.
Computer screening program FAILS to detect knives, mace, box-cutters.
9/19 hijackers were flagged for additional screening
Despite additional screening, all hijackers make it on intended flights.
Box-cutters, knives, bomb  did not trigger any alarms.

7. Atta’s luggage doesn’t make it on to flight 11
gate Logan Airport calls Donald Bennett (crew chief for flight 11) & inquires about Atta’s 2 suitcase whereabouts.
he’s told that the suitcases have arrived late, and the baggage compartment had already been locked.
 Conveniently enough, these suitcases will later serve as indicators of the hijacker’s master plan.
Arabic language flight training manuals, Quran, video tapes on how to fly an airplane.
Why would the hijackers bother to pack a suitcase if they plan on dying? And if they were packing in an attempt not to attract attention without one, WHY would they pack a suitcase FULL of incriminating evidence? – DOESN’T MAKE SENSE?  This makes it too convenient. And this suitcase is among the only suitcases that didn’t make the connecting flights – and it is not typical for a gate agent to inquire about the status particular passenger’s suitcases

8. Flight 11 is hijacked BETWEEN THE TIMES OF 8:13 & 8:21
THERE IS DEBATE OVER EXACT TIME THE PLANE’S TRANSPONDER WAS TURNED OFF.
Initial reports claim it was at 8:13 that the plane disappeared on BFC’s radar
AMY SWEENEY & BETTY ONG CALL BOSTON FLIGHT CONTROL CONFIRMING HIJACKING AT 8:20
“they just gained access to the cockpit” – 7 mins after transponder was turned off.
So who, if not the hijackers in the cockpit, had turned the transponder off around 8:13?

9. Faa protocol requires cockpit doors remain closed and locked
HOW DID HIJACKERS GAIN ACCESS TO THE COCKPIT?
9/11 COMMISSION REPORT ADMITS, “WE DO NOT KNOW EXACTLY HOW THE HIJACKERS GAINED ACCESS TO THE COCKPIT...”

10. Talkback button consistently pushed throughout flight
This, conveniently, allowed Boston Flight controllers to hear Atta’s announcement to the passengers – which ultimately reconfirmed that a hijacking was taking place.
It is believed that the pilot was activating it to communicate with flight control in an attempt to alert them of the hijacking
It was after this was heard, that they felt they had grounds to declare flight 11 a hijacking.
Sweeney and Ong’s testimonies did not suffice?
Why did all 4 pilots fail to to dial standard “HJCK” distress code?
This is something they are trained to do in case of a hijacking
If he could push the talk back button, he could have

11. BOSTON FLIGHT CONTROL LEARNS OF HIJACKING AT 8:20
FAA protocol states that the center that reported the hijacking must immediately notify the military.
NORAD IS NOT NOTIFIED UNTIL 8:38
Almost 20 minutes after hijacking has been confirmed by Sweeney and Ong. 
US military planners had actually practiced and conducted simulating hijacked planes flying into the WTC’s 2 years prior to the attack.
6 minutes went by before fighters were ordered m

12. Norad did all that it could to prevent attacks
Failure to scramble: NORAD, once notified of the off-course aircraft, failed to scramble jets from the nearest bases.
Failure to intercept: Once airborne, interceptors failed to reach their targets because they were ordered to fly at small fractions of their top speeds.
Failures to redeploy: Fighters that were airborne and within interception range of the deviating aircraft were not redeployed to pursue them.

13. Who was commanding norad?
e7Xw&feature=related
both of these videos further justify the connection between government officials (in this case, Cheney) and the NUMEROUS discrepancies that ultimately hindered any chance of the US stopping the attacks from occurring.

14. If obl’s intent was to destroy the united states,
THEN THE IDEAL TERRORIST TARGET WOULD HAVE BEEN INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR POWER STATIONS.
“FLIGHT 11” WAS FLYING DIRECTLY OVER IT AT ONE POINT
Had the plane hit into it, it could have caused a meltdown and a release of vast amounts of radiation. There are also a cumulative 65 operating years worth of highly radioactive waste stored at Indian Point. Causalities could possibly be upwards of 20 million people prematurely dying from radiation poisoning.

15. SEVERAL CALLS MADE FROM CELL PHONES
“Travelers could be talking on their personal cell phones as early as Earlier this month [July 2004], American Airlines conducted a trial run on a modified aircraft that permitted cell phone calls.” (WP, July 27, 2004)
/Safe_phone_calls_from_planes_now_possible
IT IS POSSIBLE, BUT CLAIM IT COULD’VE HAPPENED BY 2007 – THAT’S FAR LATER THAN 2001.
Wireless communications networks weren’t designed for ground-to-air communication. Cellular experts privately admit that they’re surprised the calls were able to be placed from the hijacked planes, and that they lasted as long as they did.

16. George w. bush witnessed first plane hit the tower

17. BUILDINGS COLLAPSED DUE TO STRUCTURAL FAILURE
Controlled demolition is the reason for collapse of the twin towers.
(2:40)
the 3 peaks at the base coincide with the 3 explosions heard in the first tower in the previous video
When commenting on the attacks, Bush refers to explosives in the building?
Construction worker Phillip Morelli describes being thrown to the ground by two explosions while in the fourth subbasement of the North Tower. The first, which threw him to the ground and seemed to coincide with the plane crash, was followed by a larger blast that again threw him to the ground and this time blew out walls.

18. PASSPORTS FOUND AMID DEBRIS AND RUBBLE
The passports found further justified Osama Bin Laden’s connection with the attacks.
unfortunately, no black-box was found.

19. WORLD TRADE CENTER—BUILDING 7
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
--47 floors
--steel frame
--collapsed at 5:21PM
--no airplane flew into it
--collapsed in 6.5 seconds

20. OFFICIAL STORY
NIST (national institute of standards and technology) claims that building 7 was
“The first known instance of fire causing the total collapse of a tall building”.
The building was set on fire from falling debris from the collapse of BUILDINGS 1 & 2
9/11 commission report neglects to mention the WTC 7 collapse and fails to elaborate on what has been said about its collapse in the media and by officials concerned with 9/11.

21. Building 7 When reporting on building 7, it had yet to have collapsed
 Larry Silverstein admits what caused building 7’s collapse:  
** Is it plausible to believe that two out of the three towers affected were hit by planes, yet collapsed in an identical manner to the 3rd tower, which was later admitted to have collapsed due to controlled demolition?

22. 1988
First Interstate Bank building fire in Los Angeles, CA
Burned for 3.5 hours
Took out 4 floors out of 64 floor building
1991
Meridian plaza building in Philadelphia, PE
Took out 8 floors out of 38 floor building
Both of these fires were far more severe then fires in BUILDING 7
but both buildings did not collapse.

23. SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 Fires start around 9AM in building 7
Fires burned slow all day, only lasting 20 minutes in each given area
Most floors did not have fires
No fires along the base of the building
FIRES HAVE NEVER DESTROYED A STEEL BUILDING

24. Possible theories
Collaborative effort between the United States and Israel to pursue a hidden agenda (NEW WORLD ORDER + STIMULATE ECONOMY)
Collaborative effort between all three parties (Israel, US, OBL)
Collaborative effort between US and the Mujahideen

25. Possible Undeclared Motives for Invasion of Iraq
1.) Control of Iraqi Oil
2.) Creating a Country to Neocon Design
3.) Creating a Haven for Investment

26. “THE SMAREST THING TO DO IS PULL IT”
“Pull it” is one of the main expressions used in the demolition industry to describe the collapsing of a building.
A building can NOT be properly demolished in a several hour time span. At the very least, it would need to take weeks of preparation.
Why would Silverstein and team even collapse WTC7 if it’s “That obvious”
-Maybe he did the CIA, who’s largest offices were inside WTC7, a favor by destroying all evidence.

27. Suspicious Activity at the twin towers
Newsday Article published on September 12, 2001.
“The World Trade Center was destroyed just days after a heightened security alert was lifted at the landmark 110-story towers, security personnel said yesterday. Daria Coard, 37, a guard at Tower One, said the security detail had been working 12-hour shifts for the past two weeks because of numerous phone threats. But on Thursday, bomb-sniffing dogs were abruptly removed.

28. Suspicious Activity (Con’t)
Multiple employees have confirmed that a power outage had occurred in the World Trade Center towers on the weekend prior to 9/11, including security guards.
From Saturday, September 8 at 5pm until Sunday, September 9th around Noon, the south tower experienced a power outage, with no security cameras, no security locks, and many engineers coming in and out of the building.
Scott Forbes, a database administrator at the WTC was told several days before the power outage to shut down all systems before the power went out. He then spent the entire Sunday evening/Monday morning re-booting the systems.

29. Suspicious Activity (Con’t)
On multiple attempts, he tried to contact the 9/11 commission report, but they never responded to him. Here is one letter he sent to them:
“On the weekend of 9/8,9/9 there was a 'power down' condition in WTC tower 2, the south tower. This power down condition meant there was no electrical supply for approx 36hrs from floor 50 up. I am aware of this situation since I work in IT and had to work with many others that weekend to ensure that all systems were cleanly shutdown beforehand ... and then brough[t] back up afterwards. The reason given by the WTC for the power down was that cabling in the tower was being upgraded ... Of course without power there were no security cameras, no security locks on doors and many, many 'engineers' coming in and out of the tower. I was at home on the morning of 9-11 on the shore of Jersey City, right opposite the Towers, and watching events unfold I was convinced immediately that something was happening related to the weekend work ...”

30. THE PENTAGON
FLIGHT #77

31. Chain of occurring events on the day of the “attack”
On September 11, 2001 flight number 77 departed from Washington D.C. for L.A. at 8:20 a.m.
Declared ‘hijack’
Was the military informed?
Transponder off at 8:56 a.m.
Travelers undetected for 36 minutes
FBI was notified at 9:20 a.m.
Military informed? (Mineta)
Cheney order on #77: “still stands” at 9:26a.m.
Dulles radar finds plane at 9:32 a.m.
Military informed??? - 9:34 a.m.
IMPACT (east side) at 9:38

32. A plane flying into the Pentagon, a heavily reinforced building built to withstand a severe blow, would not leave behind an imprint like a snow-angel.
A plane flying into the Twin Towers, a building with the majority of its surface area glass, would leave behind an imprint.

33. MCINTYRE:
“You know, it might have appeared that way, but from my close-up inspection, there’s no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon. The only site is the actual site of the building that’s crashed in [emphasis added], and as I said, the only pieces left that you can see are small enough that you can pick up in your hand. There are no large tail sections, wing sections, fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around, which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse [emphasis added].”

34. Computer animation of the plane just before it hits the Pentagon.

35. A corporate jet crashed into a side of a warehouse in New Jersey in Notice the plane is viewable and the amount of debris. No one was killed in that crash.
A corporate jet crashed into a side of a warehouse in New Jersey in Notice the plane is viewable and the amount of debris. No one was killed in that crash.

36. Before the Pentagon collapsed, after plane hit
Before the Pentagon collapsed, after plane hit. There is no fuselage of airplane visible.
Before the Pentagon collapsed, after plane hit. There is no fuselage of airplane visible.

37.
Fuel damage?

38. Picture taken 4 days before September 11th
Picture taken 4 days before September 11th. Clearly shows a marking in the grass that the plane took when it crashed. It is viewable from above but not easily viewable from the ground.
Picture taken 4 days before September 11th. Clearly shows a marking in the grass that the plane took when it crashed. It is viewable from above but not easily viewable from the ground.

39. Video Of Impact Notice the Date in the bottom left, Sept. 12??
This is the only video of what happened available to the public. All other video resources that captured the crash were quickly confiscated by the government and yet to be released.

40. Frame 1, White vapor behind a flying object
Frame 1, White vapor behind a flying object. Do commercial airlines leave a white vapor behind their engines? A missile or an unmanned drone would.

41. Final Frame, Clearly visible white smoke and impact in side of Pentagon. Does the fireball indicate a commercial airliner hit the Pentagon?

42. Official Entire Flight Path

43. The 270 Degree Turn
Very unlikely the pilot had the experience or skill to fly a commercial aircraft with such precisions.
Going at the reported speed of 450 mph, a 270 degree is such a risky maneuver for an experience military pilot for a person with such a lack of experience it is unlikely.

44. Eyewitnesses to Flight Path
13 different eye witnesses from six different vantage points all have the plane coming from a more northern approach as opposed to the official report which has the flight path coming more from the south.
North of the navy annex and north of the Citgo gas station

45. Flight Path of #77

46. Conflicting Data
Flight Path Animation supplied and plotted by National Transportation Safety Board.
Q8nSEeUec&feature=player_embedded#!
Animation supports the claims of 13 eyewitness’ flight path

47. Hijackers
ayer_embedded
After the September 11th attacks, the “Loose Change” documentary stated that all of the hijackers were in fact alive in other countries. Rather presumptuous since it is possible for two different people to have identical names. But they did raise a good point; how did the passports of the terrorists survive the explosion? In the aftermath of the attacks, passports and identification were found as evidence. Many skeptics question how identification made out of paper survived an explosion, which destroyed buildings.

48. The Pilot of flight 77 Hani Hanjour Hani Hanjour
He didn’t have a ticket, so how did he get on the plane?
He wasn’t listed on the flight manifest, so there is not any proof that he was on the plane in the first place. Where did his name come from?
Failed and dropped out of private flight school in Arizona.
His instructor testified that he was clueless and would never make it as a pilot.
A man of these qualifications could never of flown Flight 77.

49. More on hijackers
Mohammed Atta, one of the main hijackers of Flight 11 that crashed into the WTC North Tower.
There’s a report that he was wired $100,000 dollars by General Ahmad of Pakistan shortly before the attacks; why would he need that money if he was going to die?
Passports of Satam al Suqami (flight 11), Ziad Jarrah, and Saeed al- Ghamdi (flight 93) were reportedly found at the crash sites. How could the passports have been placed so strategically after the blast and did not catch fire?
On September 23, 2001, BBC and the Daily Telegraph reported that some of the hijackers were alive and well. Waleed al-Sheri (flight 11) was reportedly found in living in Morocco.

50. More on hijackers
Abdulaziz al-Omari, Saeed Al-Ghamdi, and Khalid al-Midhar were all also reportedly still alive and living in the Middle East after the attacks. All reports have since been a referred to as mistaken identity cases by the FBI.
Another defense used by the FBI in regards to the mistaken identity cases is that many of the hijackers varied the spelling of their names, for example Hani Saleh Hanjour, also used "Hani Hanjoor", "Hani Saleh", "Hami Hanjoor” But if they had the wrong names from the beginning, thn who are the pictures of that were released to the media??
Majority of pilots were flight school dropouts like Hanjour so how could they have performed these attacks with such percision?
Mohammed Atta: "His attention span was zero." Khalid Al-Mihdhar: "We didn't kick him out, but he didn't live up to our standards." Marwan Al-Shehhi: "He was dropped because of his limited English and incompetence at the controls." Salem Al-Hazmi: "We advised him to quit after two lessons." Hani Hanjour: "His English was horrible, and his mechanical skills were even worse. It was like he had hardly even ever driven a car. I'm still to this day amazed that he could have flown into the Pentagon. He could not fly at all."

51. This is somewhat a blue print of the pentagon itself illustrating the damage and the specific side where flight #77 targeted

52. 9/11 is not something that can be planned overnight.
Obviously it took time and a lot of effort to come up with a plan.
If it were supposedly a terrorist attack they obviously did not go into the operation without any preparations such as finding blue prints of the pentagon or flight pathways etc..
If that case is true then wouldn’t we assume that the terrorists would want to target very important parts of the pentagon rather than “the peaceful side” or the side where very few individuals occupy.
In addition, why would they target a part that is not as significant as the army wing, or the navy or even the air force wing

53. The part that was actually targeted by the airplane was the with that contained a meteorology center, communications, technical room, operations room, etc…
This part wouldn’t cause as much damage as it would have caused if these more important parts were targeted. So why target the “peaceful wing”

54. United 93

55. What they want us to believed happened!
Four al-Qaeda members hijacked United 93 with the aim to crash somewhere in DC.
That Several of the passengers made telephone calls to loved ones, and rebelled against he hijackers crashing the plane in Shanksville, PA

56. The Plane Crash
Where did the plane go, it is nowhere to be seen in the photos of the crash site when there should be remains of a plane, luggage and bodies.

57. United 93 plane crash
Other Plane Crash
So Where Did United 93 Go?

58. Phone Calls From United 93?
37 Phone calls where made from United 93- Two from cell phones, and 35 from the onboard phones.
The Cell Phone Calls
The Cell Phone calls that where made where made from around 30,000 ft in the air.
Successful Cell Phones calls could be made only at heights of under 2000 ft, with the technology that exist today.
At the time of Sept there was no such technology to make cell phone calls from airplanes.
How Where these two Cell phone call made?

59. Phone Calls From United 93?
Phone calls made from onboard phones.
These Phone calls where fake!
Why?
The loved ones that received the calls from passengers on the plane described that during the calls the passengers where claim and the background seem very quiet and claim for being a hijacked plane
Mark Bingham!

60. Phone Calls From United 93?
Tom Burnet
Except for saying his wife's name a few times during the calls he never mentioned a name.
For example during his final call, when he asked about his children, he only referred to them as the kids, which is not completely surprising, but when his wife told him the kids wanted to talk to him, he said “I’ll talk to them later”, why would man certain that he was facing death, say I will talk to them later this would have been the last time and chance to say I love you to his children.
The probable reason why he didn't’t want to talk to the children is that the “Tom” on the phone would not have to demonstrate knowledge of the children or of their names.

61. Where was the military?
Why, with the knowledge of the prior days events, would there be no military action against the hijacked plane?
There was enough time to respond to the plane from the time the plane was declared hijack, to the Impact in PA.
There was 35 minutes to act on the plane, 35 minutes that were supposedly wasted!
There had to be military action within those 35 min!

62. So What really Happened?
From the facts that where presented it is most probable that the plane was shot down.
There was no large plane debris in the crash site
The calls that were made were fake.
The amount of time that was available for military action
In fact, According to investigative reporter Wayne Madsen, 3 employees of the NSA confirmed that UA 93 “was shot down over rural PA by US Air force jets scrambled from Andrews Air Force base in Maryland”

63. Why would a government do this to their own people?
To push their own agenda that the fear and anger from the attacks would cause
The U. S wanted control over the resources in the Middle East, so what better way to get control over a land and its resources, than to bring war onto that land and take it over.
What better way to push a governmental agenda than to bring fear to the masses and that is what 9/11 did.

64. In Conclusion The investigation by the government has many holes in it
This has led to the conspiracy theories
If they wanted to stop the speculation they could answer our questions or …..
RELEASE THE TRUTH