1. Gabrielse God of Antimatter Gerald Gabrielse Leverett Professor of Physics Harvard University Cambridge University Faraday Lecture 2 March 2006 time energy 0 1

2. Gabrielse Progression of a Scientific Career career success time  high low Plot the progress of a scientific career

3. Gabrielse Progression of a Scientific Career career success time  high low Plot the progress of a scientific career

4. Gabrielse Progression of a Scientific Career career success time  high low blastocyst

5. Gabrielse Progression of a Scientific Career career success time  high low first scientific paper blastocyst

6. Gabrielse Progression of a Scientific Career career success time  high low first scientific paper more papers blastocyst

7. Gabrielse Progression of a Scientific Career career success time  high low first scientific paper more papers well known for successful research programs blastocyst

8. Gabrielse Progression of a Scientific Career career success time  high low first scientific paper more papers well known for successful research programs first review paper blastocyst

9. Gabrielse Progression of a Scientific Career career success time  high low first scientific paper more papers well known for successful research programs first review paper become department chair blastocyst

10. Gabrielse Progression of a Scientific Career career success time  high low first scientific paper more papers well known for successful research programs first review paper become department chair blastocyst speak about science and religion

11. Gabrielse God of Antimatter Gerald Gabrielse Leverett Professor of Physics Harvard University Cambridge University Faraday Lecture 2 March 2006

12. Gabrielse We Are Made of Matter

13. Gabrielse Particles of Matter and Antimatter: Opposite and Identical charge mass Only measurements tell how identical

14. Gabrielse Matter and Antimatter Atoms Particle and antiparticle charges are opposite Both atoms are uncharged  same charge uncharged atom uncharged anti-atom

15. Gabrielse What Happens When Anti-Gabrielse Gabrielse Antimatter and Matter Gabrielse Meet? About to shake hands

16. Gabrielse Huge Energy Release! energy released mass that disappears 200 kg Einstein’s famous formula 100 kg Anti-Gabrielse 100 kg Gabrielse 5,000,000,000,000 kilowatt-hours Yearly output of 500 nuclear power plants Energy from 4200 Megatons of TNT

17. Gabrielse Efficiency Annihilation 100 % Nuclear fission 0.1 % Nuclear fusion 0.1 % (or a bit higher) Chemical fuel 0.000 000 3 % Annihilation 1000 times more bang for the gram compared to nuclear fuel Energy Source of the Future? No, certainly not Antimatter Weapons? No, certainly not Antimatter Rockets? Doubtful, … maybe in distant future

18. Gabrielse Antiproton Trapping and Annihilation Makes its Way Into Popular Culture Serious Play: Hapgood Author: Tom Stoppard Fiction best seller Star Trek – antimatter powers the space ship Enterprise

19. Gabrielse Should the Pope Have Worried? Missing detail: if all the antiprotons we have made in the history of the world were annihilated at the same time  Not enough energy to boil a pot of tea Clearly the pope should have studied more science

20. Gabrielse God of Antimatter Gerald Gabrielse Leverett Professor of Physics Harvard University Cambridge University Faraday Lecture 2 March 2006

21. Gabrielse One-Electron Quantum Cyclotron Tiny Accelerator Homemade “Atom” Suspend a single electron in a trap for more than 10 months only certain radii (i.e. certain energy levels) are ever realized time energy 0 1 Measure the energy (i.e. the radius) as a function of time

22. Gabrielse Random Jumping Between Quantum State 0.1  m time energy 0 1 The electron jumps between two orbits of differing radius  between its two lowest energy levels

23. Gabrielse God of Antimatter Gerald Gabrielse Leverett Professor of Physics Harvard University Cambridge University Faraday Lecture 2 March 2006

24. Gabrielse Hands “Metaphor” (Thanks to my former Ph.D. student, Dr. Ching-Hua Tseng, for being my hands.)

25. Gabrielse

26. I Don’t Know We badly need people of faith and people of science willing to say “I don’t know”, rather than folks who are always certain