1. Justice in Action: Just War Theory PHI 2604 January 25, 2016

2. Overview Three principal areas: The just conditions for entering into a war. When is it just to go to war? The just conditions for conducting a war. What are we permitted to do in carrying out a war and what is forbidden as unjust? The just conditions of peace. What are the conditions of peace that insure the just conclusion of a war? 1/25/2016PHI 26042

3. Acknowledgement This presentation is based on the excellent article by Brian D. Orend, "War,“ in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.WarStanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 1/25/2016PHI 26043

4. Jus ad bellum: The Just Conditions for Going to War  Just cause  Right intention  Proper authority and public declaration  Last resort  Probability of success  Proportionality 1/25/2016PHI 26044

5. Just cause  Protection from external attack is the first and foremost—and in the eyes of some, the only--just cause of war; based on the right of self-defense.  Some have maintained the humanitarian intervention is also justified, where we go to war to save the lives of innocent people who are being attacked by an aggressor. 1/25/2016PHI 26045

6. Right intention The war must be pursued for a just cause. Unacceptable intentions: Revenge Political expansion Land acquisition 1/25/2016PHI 26046

7. Proper authority and public declaration Traditionally, only nations have the authority to declare war. Wars must be publicly declared, not pursued in secret.  Question: Can terrorist groups be said to declare war? If not, is the response to terrorism really war? 1/25/2016PHI 26047

8. Last resort If there are other means of achieving the same objectives, such as negotiations or economic blockades, they should be pursued exhaustively first. 1/25/2016PHI 26048

9. Probability of success The rationale here is clear and simple: war is a great evil, and it is wrong to cause such killing, suffering, and destruction in a futile effort.  Question: what about countries that feel they are resisting evil even when there is little or no chance of success? For example, small European countries being invaded by the Nazis. 1/25/2016PHI 26049

10. Proportionality Are the possible benefits (especially in terms of a just peace) proportional to the death, suffering, and destruction that the pursuit of the war will bring about? 1/25/2016PHI 260410

11. Jus in bello: The Just Conditions for Conducting a War Three principal conditions: 1.Discrimination 2.Proportionality 3.No means that are evil in themselves. 1/25/2016PHI 260411

12. Discrimination The key requirement here is to discriminate between those who are engaged in harm (soldiers) and those who are not (civilians). This has increasingly become an issue as countries such as the United States have turned to high altitude bombing campaigns that are more likely to put civilians at risk. 1/25/2016PHI 260412

13. Proportionality Onoe should only use the amount of force that is proportional to the (just) ends being sought. This raises interesting issues in the use of massive air strikes against bin Laden by the United States. 1/25/2016PHI 260413

14. No Means Evil in Themselves Orend lists a number of means that count as evil in themselves. “mass rape campaigns; “genocide or ethnic cleansing; “torturing captured enemy soldiers; and “using weapons whose effects cannot be controlled, like chemical or biological agents.” 1/25/2016PHI 260414

15. Jus post bellum: Creating a Just Peace Brian Orend gives 5 conditions for a just peace: 1.Just cause for termination. 2.Right intention. 3.Public declaration and legitimate authority. 4.Discrimination. 5.Proportionality. 1/25/2016PHI 260415

16. Just cause for termination Orend: “a reasonable vindication of those rights whose violation grounded the resort to war in the first place.” Unjust gains from aggression have been eliminated Victims’ rights reinstated Formal apology Acceptance of reasonable punishment 1/25/2016PHI 260416

17. Right intention Excludes motives such as revenge Prosecution of war crimes needs to be applied to all, not just the vanquished. 1/25/2016PHI 260417

18. Public declaration and legitimate authority This requirement is fairly straightforward and uncontroversial. 1/25/2016PHI 260418

19. Discrimination Differentiate between Political and military leaders Military and civilian populations Punish the elite responsible for prosecuting the war, not the uninvolved civilians. 1/25/2016PHI 260419

20. Proportionality The vanquished do not lose their rights No ‘witch hunts’ Proportional to reasonable rights vindication 1/25/2016PHI 260420