1. Farmers’ perspective of the effect of quality attributes on prices of small ruminants in Somaliland N. Mtimet, F. Wanyoike, L.G. Mugunieri, N. Ndiwa, F. Wesonga, K. Marshall 2 nd International Conference on Sustainable Development in Africa Dakar – Senegal 26 th -27 th November 2015

2. Background Somaliland: Northern region of Somalia 3.5 million persons 137,600 km 2 Figure 1. Map of Somalia

3. Background Livestock sector: 70% of the population 60% GDP 85% of forex earning Export oriented to the Middle-East market (KSA, Yemen, Oman, etc.) 3.5 million sheep and goats exported every year Existence of grading system in Somalia and also in importing countries

4. Background Figure 2. Schematic representation of the Somali sheep and goats grading system Which attributes influence selling price of small ruminants from producers’ perceptions and decision making?

5. 2 livelihoods zones: West Golis: pastoral – sheep, goats, camels Togdheer: agro-pastoral – sheep and goats + vegetables Data Collection & Methodology Figure 3. Study area and livelihood zones covered (Source: FSNAU, 2011)

6. 200 households surveyed (46% men – 54% women) Questionnaire: Flock size; Marketing; Etc.…; question on the attributes influencing the selling price of the sheep or goat – 13 attributes and 13 choice cards presented Analysis: standardized scores followed by cluster analysis Data Collection & Methodology Standardized Most – Least Score = (No.Most – No.Least)/ (m. n) No.Most: number of times the attribute was chosen as most important No.Least: number of times the attribute was chosen as least important m: number of respondents = 196 * n: number of times the attribute was presented to each respondent = 4

7. Table 1. Attributes used on the choice cards Data Collection & Methodology Attributes 1.Age of the animal 2.Apparent fat of the animal 3.Breed of the animal 4.Coat color of the animal 5.Conformation of the animal 6.Demand season 7.Grade of the animal 8.Health of the animal 9.I know the trader 10.Live weight of the animal 11.Nutritional status of the animal 12.Payment in cash 13.Sex of the animal

8. Most Important Attributes Least Important Breed Sex Age Coat color Card 5 Please indicate which to you is the most and least important attribute that influence the price when you sell a sheep or a goat? (Tick only one case as most important and one case as least important) Figure 4. An example of a choice card Data Collection & Methodology

9. Results Figure 5. “L-W” average scores of attributes influencing small ruminants’ price

10. Results Figure 6. “L-W” average scores by groups

11. Results Variablelevel Group 1 (n 1 =60) Group 2 (n 2 =63) Group 3 (n 3 =73) Gender of the respondent *** Man52%59%30% Woman48%41%70% HH head only sales decisionYes66%40%63% making *** No34%60%37% Gender of HH head * Man88%77%79% Woman12%23%21% Age of HH head ** Years45.140.947.9 Selling more younger animals ** Yes26%20%9% No74%80%91% Selling more older animals *** Yes44%14%76% No56%86%24% Selling animals withYes58%61%31% better body conformation *** No42%39%69% Selling more of males animals *** Yes81%61%83% No19%39%17% Table 2. External characterization of the groups

12. Conclusions 3 main factors affecting small ruminants selling price: health of the animal, body conformation and demand season reflect specifications of Somali livestock market (export driven) Women: more engaged in the local market where lower quality animals are exchanged closer dissemination and capacity building work with women group is essential to improve in overall the quality of the animal produced in Somalia Perceptions influence the type of efforts made to earn higher prices. One policy implication is that where the perceptions are not correct, rectifying this – probably through extension services – would lead to farmers focusing the in the right direction.

13. This research brief is one of a series of outputs of a capacity building program for the IGAD Sheikh Technical and Veterinary School (ISTVS) that was implemented by ILRI in partnership with Terra Nuova. We acknowledge funding from the Denmark’s development cooperation (Danida) through the project ‘Reducing Vulnerability of Somali Communities by Raising the Capacity of Indigenous Systems and Enhancing Market Access and Consumer Welfare’. Acknowledgement

14. Contacts: Nadhem Mtimet: n.mtimet@cgiar.org International Livestock Research Institute www.ilri.org Thanks