Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byPatience Campbell Modified over 8 years ago
1
Neuroscience of Learning 2005
2
What is learning? CHANGING the structure & actions of NEURONS so they HOLD INFORMATION in LONG TERM MEMORY in TEMPORAL & PARIETAL LOBES of the CORTEX
4
LEARNING requires NEURONS to CHANGE
5
Learning requires MANY neuron changes BUT two major changes are 1 Changing the amounts of neurotransmitters that neurons produce 2 Changing the connections between neurons
6
( 1) Learning requires neurons to make MORE & LESS & DIFFERENT transmitters
7
(2) Learning requires neurons to make NEW LINKS & DELETE EXISTING LINKS with other neurons
8
+ & - Bad News & Good News for Teachers in Current Neuroscience Findings
9
4 important negative findings from neuroscience 5 important positive findings from neuroscience 4 NEGATIVES & 5 POSITIVES
10
Bad news finding # 1 WE HAVE NO INTRINSIC MOTIVATION TO LEARN ACADEMIC MATERIAL
11
Food Water Sex Drugs of Abuse
12
Feel pleasant touch ( Rolls et al. 2003 ) See attractive faces ( Aharon et al. 2001 ) Hear positive words ( Hamann & Mao 2002 ) Interact with others ( Rilling et al. 2002 ) Gain social status ( Tooby & Cosmides, 2002 )
13
Human motivation system Rewarding experiences trigger amygdala activity trigger dopamine release trigger frontal lobe activity
14
AMYGDALA Computes Emotional intensity of an experience Degree of negative or positive emotion
16
FRONTAL LOBE Stores the reward value of experience Activates behaviors leading to the most rewarded outcome
17
All other complex experiences are conditioned with primary rewards $ $USE OF MONEY WORKING LEARNING FOLLOWING RULES
18
Motivation to Learn School Subjects is Conditioned Most cultures condition children with 3 primary rewards for successful learning using food teacher & parent approval increased peer social status
19
Bad news finding # 2 THERE IS NO EVIDENCE FOR LEARNING TRANSFER
20
Reviews of research show no evidence for learning transfer Barnett & Ceci (2002 ) Clement & Lecoutre (2004) Dixon & Dohn (2003) Mayer (2004)
21
No transfer means no free lunch NO SPECIFIC TRANSFER means Learning to add DOES NOT make learning to divide easier NO GENERAL TRANSFER means Learning math DOES NOT make you a better learner “in general”
22
Bad news finding # 3 THERE IS NO EVIDENCE FOR MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES
23
Gardner’s 11 Total Intelligences Linguistic, Musical, Logical-mathematical, Spatial, Bodily-kinesthetic, Personal, Naturalistic, Spiritual, Existential, Mental Searchlight, Laser
24
Gardner’s Newest Intelligences Existential = feeling at one with the cosmos Mental Searchlight = people with high IQ test scores scan widely Laser = artists and artisans “who generate the advances (as well as the catastrophes) of society”
25
Gardner Admits No Supporting Data Exists for Multiple Intelligences Allix (2000) no evidence Jie-Qi Chen (2004) no evidence Gardner (2004) no evidence Gardner and Connell (2000, p. 292) conceded that “there is little hard evidence for Multiple Intelligences theory” (2000, p. 292)
26
NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH REFUTES MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES There is consistent significant evidence for a general intelligence factor G that appears to be working memory —this stands against Multiple Intelligences (Colom et al. 2004) There is consistent significant evidence that brain systems for cognitive functions are overlapping —this stands against Multiple Intelligences (Lieberman, 2002)
27
NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH REFUTES MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES, cont. There is evidence for specific innate cognition modules (Gallistel, 2003) 1 Fast-mapping of word to object 2 Person recognition of face, voice, clothes 3 Obligation computation of what we owe others and what they owe us 4 Imitation of all aspects of the behavior of others
28
ADAPTED COGNITION MODULES STAND AGAINST MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES Each adapted cognition module is supported by evidence of its neural operations (MI intelligences are not). A given adapted cognition module, like Mirror Neuron Tissue, operates using our vision, hearing, speaking, gesturing, social awareness—this combines parts of 4 of Gardner’s intelligences—thus negating their individual existences
29
Bad news finding # 4 EVERY SINGLE MEMORY WE HAVE IS COMPLETELY UNSTABLE
30
Heraclitus was right
31
You cannot step into the same river twice EVERY TIME YOU REMEMBER SOMETHING, IT IS A DIFFERENT MEMORY, BECAUSE THE ACT OF RECALL IS A RECONSTRUCTION
32
RECALL TRANSFORMS OUR MEMORIES When we Remember our brain Takes the memory apart, Updates the memory, Brings the memory to consciousness Then makes new proteins for a new structure for the memory as it goes back into long-term storage.
33
Good news findings # 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Neuroscience research has found 5 promoter mechanisms whereby short term learning changes into long term learning
34
5 major promoters of learning = INNATE LEARNING PROGRAMS (Gallistel, 2003) REPETITION of INFORMATION (Squire and Kandel, 2000) EXCITEMENT at the time of learning (Cahill & Gorski, 2003; LeDoux, 2002) EATING CARBOHYDRATES at time of learning (Korol, 2002) 8-9 HOURS OF SLEEP after learning (Kuriyama, Stickgold, & Walker, 2004)\
35
The first promoters are innate learning programs called ADAPTED COGNITION MODULES SPECIALIZED BRAIN MODULES EVOLVED TO COMPUTE SPECIFIC INFORMATION OUTSIDE OUR CONSCIOUSNESS IN ORDER TO MAKE THAT PROCESS EASIER AND FASTER BECAUSE THOSE COMPUTATIONS HAVE BEEN IMPORTANT FOR OUR SURVIVAL
36
INNATE PROGRAMS = Adapted Cognition Modules are very specific computation systems Adapted cognition modules promote quick and easy learning of certain types of information: ●We learn people’s faces, typical movements, voices, clothing, odors very easily because we have FACE RECOGNITION TISSUE in our temporal lobes ● We learn speech and tool use motor skills more easily because we have special MIRROR NEURONS in our frontal lobes that copy the speech and movements of others
37
ADAPTED COGNITION MODULES ALSO INCLUDE COMPUTING FREQUENCIES BASIC COUNTING SKILLS COMPUTING WHAT OTHERS OWE US AND WHAT WE OWE THEM FAST MAPPING OF WORD LABEL TO OBJECTS AND SITUATIONS COMPUTING SOCIAL STATUS AND INSULTS TO SOCIAL STATUS
38
The 2 nd Learning Promoter is REPETITION Squire & Kandel (2000) Reviewed neurobiology of learning Brain forms long term memories depending on “the number of times the event or fact is repeated”
39
REPETITION Squire & Kandel (2000) Reviewed neurobiology of learning Brain forms long term memories depending on “the number of times the event or fact is repeated”
40
Repetition causes neurons to make MORE and LESS neurotransmitter
41
Repetition causes neurons to make MORE and FEWER CONNECTIONS with other neurons
42
ORIGIN OF TEACHING IS REPETITION We all unconsciously repeat important information in conversations All cultures teach important stories by verbal repetition Chinese teachers were taught to say everything TWICE… Most teachers discover that repetition is valuable
43
The 3 rd learning promoter is EXCITEMENT LeDoux has studied the brain for 30 years & reported (2002) that “we remember particularly well…those things that arouse our emotions”
44
Cahill & Gorski (2003) research
45
Excitement automatically increases certain neurotransmitters
46
Excitement sets NEURON CONNECTIONS in the “ON” position
47
The 4 th learning promoter is EATING CARBOHYDRATES Greenwood and Winocur (2001) research: high-fat diet impairs brain glucose metabolism needed to form long term memory Korol (2002) research: eating carbohydrates enhanced memory (Smith, 2003) research: lack of breakfast impairs learning
48
Eating carbohydrates gives the brain glucose to organize new synapse locations
49
Eating carbohydrates provides glucose to make glycoproteins that bind neurons to one another
50
EXTREME DIETING IMPAIRS LEARNING A majority of young women age 12 to 30 yrs in the US are on fad diets. During periods of dieting, their learning will be significantly slowed and it will be harder for them to retain information.
51
The 5 th learning promoter is 8-9 HOURS OF SLEEP SPECIAL ISSUE of the journal Learning and Memory (2004 V11, N6) reports a wide range of evidence for consolidation of learning during sleep
52
Macbeth ( 2.2.46-51) Sleep that knits up the ravell’d sleave of care, The death of each day’s life, sore labour’s bath, Balm of hurt minds, great nature’s second course, Chief nourisher in life’s feast.
53
SLEEP IS A FREE LEARNING TOOL DREAMING SLEEP promotes differential strengthening of neurons in networks holding learned information NON-DREAMING SLEEP activates calcium channels that biologically repeat the neural path of learning to force long term storage
54
DREAMING SLEEP causes differential strengthening by altering neurotransmitters
55
NON-DREAMING sleep causes new neuron CONNECTIONS to be automatically repeated
56
Research shows that TOO LITTLE SLEEP or IMPAIRED SLEEP = IMPAIRED LEARNING Alcohol ingested after a day of learning inhibits dreaming sleep and impairs memory storage of the day’s information Drugs of abuse used after learning have similar bad effects on sleep and the day’s learning A majority of teens, college students and working adults in the US are sleep- deprived
57
Of the 5 major learning promoters INNATE LEARNING PROGRAMS (Gallistel, 2002) REPETITION of INFORMATION (Squire and Kandel, 2000) EXCITEMENT at the time of learning (Cahill & Gorski, 2003; LeDoux, 2002) EATING CARBOHYDRATES at time of learning (Korol, 2002) 8-9 HOURS OF SLEEP after learning (Kuriyama, Stickgold, & Walker, 2004)\
58
TEACHERS CAN CONTROL ONLY 2 PROMOTERS Repetition & Excitement
59
BUT TEACHERS CAN ALSO PERMIT AND ENCOURAGE HEALTHY CARBOHYDRATE SNACKING AND TALK TO STUDENTS AND PARENTS ABOUT THE IMPORTANCE OF SLEEP
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.