Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Skip Hudspeth and Gordon Hayhoe 112/20/2015. Pavement Roughness Subjective Pilot Rating Study Phase I - Develop a surface roughness model on the B737-800.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Skip Hudspeth and Gordon Hayhoe 112/20/2015. Pavement Roughness Subjective Pilot Rating Study Phase I - Develop a surface roughness model on the B737-800."— Presentation transcript:

1 Skip Hudspeth and Gordon Hayhoe 112/20/2015

2 Pavement Roughness Subjective Pilot Rating Study Phase I - Develop a surface roughness model on the B737-800 flight simulator for input of real world airport surface elevation profiles. Phase II - Develop runway and taxiway pavement roughness rating scales for determining pavement condition for maintenance. The rating scales will be based on pilot's subjective ratings in response to simulator cockpit motions. 12/20/20152

3 Acknowledgements Federal Aviation Administration 312/20/2015

4 B737-800 Simulator Overview Surface Roughness Model Enhancements Challenges and Resolutions Roughness Model Testing Future Work 12/20/20154

5 FAA B737-800 Flight Simulator Located at the FAA’s Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center in Oklahoma City. Level D Full Flight Simulator Six-degree-of-freedom motion system. High resolution visual display and sound system. Does not provide real world surface roughness models 512/20/2015

6 Flight Simulator Overview Flight Compartment Host Computer Motion Control Cabinet Motion Platform 612/20/2015 Visual Display Visual Image Generator Interface

7 Flight Simulator Overview Flight Compartment Host Computer Motion Control Cabinet Motion Platform 712/20/2015 Visual Display Visual Image Generator Interface

8 Flight Simulator Overview Flight Compartment Host Computer Motion Control Cabinet Motion Platform 812/20/2015 Visual Display Visual Image Generator Interface

9 Flight Simulator Overview Flight Compartment Host Computer Motion Control Cabinet Motion Platform 912/20/2015 Visual Display Visual Image Generator Interface

10 12/20/201510 B737-800 Simulator Motion Platform

11 Simulator Motion System Due to limited travel, sustained accelerations are not possible. Motion system designed to provides acceleration onset cueing. Flight model accelerations are filtered to optimize the available motion response for training maneuvers. An accelerometer mounted below the pilot seats provides measurement of cockpit vertical accelerations. 1112/20/2015

12 Motion System Inputs from the Flight Model Receives rigid body accelerations from flight model Other motion effects are simulated through the use of buffet and special effects generators within the motion system. These include stall and flap buffets, touchdown bumps, etc. 1212/20/2015

13 Flight Simulator Overview Flight Compartment Host Computer Motion Control Cabinet Motion Platform 1312/20/2015 Visual Display Visual Image Generator Interface

14 Flight Model Overview Equations of Motion ThrustWeightAtmosphere GroundAerodynamics Simulator Motion System Simulator Visual System Simulator Flight Model 1412/20/2015

15 Existing B737-800 Simulator Surface Roughness Model The simulator provides a generic roughness model using randomly generated vertical surface deviations. The generic roughness amplitude is selectable with range from 0 to 5. 1512/20/2015

16 Random vs Actual Surface Roughness 12/20/201516 Generic (random) surface roughness Regional heavy runway surface roughness

17 New Surface Roughness Model Replaces the random roughness generation with profiles measured on airport pavements. Allows selection of surface profiles from simulator instructor station. Integrates with existing simulator models. Aligns airport surface profiles with visual scenes. Provides realistic simulator cockpit motion. 1712/20/2015

18 Surface Profiles Formatted for use on the Simulator Surface elevation is uniform across width of the profile. Elevation units changed from inches to feet. Surface profile sample spacing of four feet. Profiles were filtered to remove very low frequency variations in elevation. 12/20/201518

19 Profile Filtering Example 12/20/201519 Runway elevation profile before high-pass filtering Runway elevation profile after high-pass filtering

20 Integration of Surface Roughness Profiles into the Simulator Flight Model 12/20/201520 Surface Profile Strut Model Gear Forces

21 12/20/201521 Surface Profile Strut Model Flight Model Linear /rotational accelerations at CG Flight Model Generates CG Accelerations

22 Motion System Transforms CG into Cockpit Accelerations 12/20/201522 Surface Profile Strut Model Flight Model Motion System

23 Aircraft Flexible Modes The simulator flight model assumes a rigid aircraft body. However, aircraft body flexing provides a large component of the cockpit acceleration response to surface roughness. 12/20/201523

24 12/20/201524 Cockpit vertical accelerations with rigid body modes Cockpit vertical accelerations with rigid body and four flexible body modes

25 Flexible Mode Simulation Assumes lightly damped linearly flexible continuous body. Four flexible modes were modeled. Implemented on the host computer. Strut force used to excite the flexible modes. Outputs vertical accelerations at the cockpit position. Cockpit vertical accelerations were transformed into CG pitch accelerations for transfer to the motion system. 12/20/201525

26 Surface Roughness Model Evaluation Tests were developed to evaluate the roughness model performance through the collection of time histories of aircraft and surface profile parameters such as: Landing gear position along profile Surface height at each gear position Ground speed Landing gear vertical force C0mputed cockpit vertical acceleration Actual cockpit vertical acceleration 12/20/201526

27 12/20/201527 Cockpit vertical acceleration - 130 knots Cockpit vertical acceleration - 100 knots Cockpit vertical acceleration - 50 knots Effect of ground speed on cockpit accelerations

28 12/20/201528 Cockpit Accelerations: Computed (top) and Measured (bottom) Rigid Body OnlyOne Flexible Mode

29 Subjective Pilot Evaluation Two industry pilots were asked to evaluate the realism of various runway roughness profiles. The pilots performed the following maneuvers: Taxiing Takeoffs Landings The pilot’s feedback indicated that the profile roughness models provided a realistic simulation of the real world runways except for the absence of background tire rumble and cockpit response to centerline lights and concrete joint bumps. 12/20/201529

30 Summary A B737-800 simulator surface r0ughness model was successfully implemented allowing use of actual airport surface profiles and providing realistic cockpit motion response to the profile elevation changes. The surface roughness model provided a distinct enhancement over the existing runway random roughness models through the use of selectable real world surface profiles. 12/20/201530

31 Further Work Phase II of this project is currently in progress with a preliminary test of subjective pilot rating tests planned for this summer. 12/20/201531

32 12/20/201532 Contact Information Gordon F. Hayhoe FAA Airport Technology R&D Branch, AJP-6312 William J. Hughes Technical Center Atlantic City International Airport, NJ 08405 gordon.hayhoe@faa.gov gordon.hayhoe@faa.gov Skip Hudspeth Hudspeth & Associates, Inc. 11130 Johnson Davis Road Huntersville, NC 28078 skip@hudspethandassociates.com


Download ppt "Skip Hudspeth and Gordon Hayhoe 112/20/2015. Pavement Roughness Subjective Pilot Rating Study Phase I - Develop a surface roughness model on the B737-800."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google