Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

KNOW THY IMPACT: The Power of Common Formative Assessments

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "KNOW THY IMPACT: The Power of Common Formative Assessments"— Presentation transcript:

1 KNOW THY IMPACT: The Power of Common Formative Assessments
Tami Hicks WVEC Professional Development Cooordinator

2

3 JOHN HATTIE – VISIBLE LEARNING
“Common formative assessments are designed to give students specific feedback on the clear target to be achieved, along with suggestions on how to reach that target on subsequent assessments. Students need to understand that this feedback will not be graded but that it will be used by their teachers to design specific instruction to help them improve. After a review of almost 8,000 classroom studies focused on determining the impact of feedback on student improvement, John Hattie (1992) declared: “The most powerful single modification that enhances achievement is feedback. The simplest prescription for improving education must be ‘dollops of feedback’” (Hattie, 1992, p. 9).

4 The Power Of COMMON Assessments
“Schools with the greatest improvements in student achievement consistently used common assessments.” Reeves, 2004

5 What are Common Formative Assessments?
Assessments for learning that are typically created collaboratively by a team of teachers responsible for the same grade level or course on identified “essential” learning.

6 Why Common Formative Assessments?
Gather accurate information about student achievement across a subject area and grade level while learning is in process. (Assessment for learning) Use assessment process and results effectively to promote maximum student learning success Identify and evaluate instructional strategies that are effective in helping students acquire the intended knowledge. Some schools use the pre/post assessment model.

7 The Two Tools of Assessment
“No single assessment can meet everyone’s information needs…To maximize student success, assessment must be seen as an instructional tool for use while learning is occurring, and as an accountability tool to determine if learning has occurred. Because both purposes are important, they must be in balance.” NEA, 2003

8 Two Purposes of Assessment: Important Distinctions
Diagnosis – Assessment FOR Learning Evaluation – Assessment OF Learning

9 Assessment FOR Learning
Formative: Given before and during the teaching process Diagnostic: Intended to be used as a guide to improve teaching and learning Provides teachers with information they need to create appropriate work for groups of learners or individual students Not typically used to assign grades Answers key questions: Do students possess critical pre-requisite skills and knowledge? Do students already know some of the material that is to be taught? Bravmann, 2004

10 Assessment OF Learning
Summative assessment for unit, quarter, semester, grade level, or course of study Provides “status report” on degree of student proficiency or mastery relative to targeted standard(s) Helps teachers judge effectiveness of their teaching practices Supports the assignment of grades Answers question: Have students achieved the goals defined by a given standard or group of standards? Bravmann, 2004

11 GOAL FOR TEACHERS USING CFA’s: Focus On Learning
What do we want our students to know, understand and be able to do? - Unpacking Standards (I can statements for students) How will we know when they have learned it? Data Protocols and Common Assessments How will we respond when some students have not learned and how will we respond when some students have learned? Interventions, Re-teaching, Extending and Enriching The WSFCS focus on learning centers around 3 questions that encompass knowing and understanding the essential standards/goals/objectives of our content; common formative assessments and the ways we know students have learned as well as how we use that information; what will we do when some of our students have not learned and some have…..interventions, reteaching, extending and enriching—What will we do to ensure high levels of learning for all students? “Learning by Doing”. Dufour, Dufour, Eaker, Many. Solution Tree.2006

12 What Capacities Do Teachers Need to Effectively Use Common Formative Assessments?
ARTICLE Highlight/underline key words Write any thoughts in margins VIDEOS Which capacities do you see being exhibited by teachers in these videos? CAPACITY INVENTORY Think of your teachers – Where do they fall on inventory?

13 TEACHING CHANNEL VIDEOS
GUIDING INSTRUCTION WITH COMMON FORMATIVE ASSESSMENTS  USING COMMON FORMATIVE ASSESSMENTS TO IMPROVE TEACHING AND LEARNING

14 PLC’s –TIME FOR TEACHERS
Focus on Learning Focus on Collaborating Focus on Results Do you have PLC’s at your school? When, and how often, do they occur? How do they operate? What is the focus?

15 All Teams Engage In An Ongoing Cycle of:
Gathering evidence of current levels of student learning Developing strategies to build on strengths and address weaknesses in that learning

16 All Teams Engage In An Ongoing Cycle of:
Implementing the strategies and ideas Analyzing the impact of the changes to discover what was effective and what was not Applying the new knowledge in the next cycle of continuous improvement

17 All Teams Engage In An Ongoing Cycle of Continuous Improvement
Data: Gather Evidence of Student Learning Apply New Knowledge Develop Strategies Analyze the Impact Implement Strategies All Teams Engage In An Ongoing Cycle of Continuous Improvement

18 The Basic Picture-PLC Analyzing evidence of student learning
Examining Data Protocols Clarifying essential student learning Unpacking Standards Developing common formative assessments Instructional practices that impact student learning Examining student work Standards in Practice

19 DEVELOPING COMMON ASSESSMENTS
Teams Need to be trained in the process of writing CFA’s Teams need time together on a regular basis Admin needs to engage with teams on regular basis When students included, achievement increases even more Tips for Writing CFA’s:

20 In a nutshell, PLC teams collectively …
Decide what’s important to teach. Decide how they’ll know that students learned it. Decide what they’ll do if they don’t learn it or if they already know it. Do it … study it … tweak it and keep the cycle going!!

21 Common Formative Assessments:
Assess all students with the same rigor, on the same targets Usually are Not graded. (formative) If teachers feel they must be used for grades then students should be given additional opportunities to demonstrate learning. Should identify students who need additional time and support for learning.

22 Common Formative Assessments:
Assess all students with the same rigor, on the same targets Usually are Not graded. (formative) If teachers feel they must be used for grades then students should be given additional opportunities to demonstrate learning. Should identify students who need additional time and support for learning.

23 BASIC PROCESS Identify essential learning outcomes and power standards. Unwrap the standards. Develop accurate and aligned assessment items. Establish proficiency levels.

24 Learning Team Common Assessment Process Effective Communication
Clear Purpose Clear Targets Sound Design Effective Communication Student Involvement

25 Clear Targets To separate the essential from the peripheral, teachers carefully apply 2 criteria to each target: Endurance – are students expected to retain the skills/knowledge long after the test is completed? Readiness for the Next Level of Learning – is this skill/knowledge preparing the student for success in the next grade/course? Doug Reeves

26 Recommended # of CFA Items
Grade Levels # of CFA Items Grades K-1 Approximately 5-8 Grades 2-3 Approximately 8-10 Grade 4-5 Approximately 10-15 Grades 6-8 Approximately 15-20 Grades 9-12 Approximately 20-25

27 WHERE ITEMS CAN COME FROM
Unit chapter tests/assessments Teacher Created assessments Past ISTEP/ECA’s – from IDOE site Using example items from IDOE for new standards OTHER?

28 Assessment Methods Selected Response-Multiple choice, true/false, matching, short answer, fill-in Extended Written Response (constructed response)-Requires student response that is at least several sentences in length. Scoring guide. Performance assessment-Observation and judgment as to quality of performance or product. Requires scoring guide. Personal communication-Requires interaction with students..can be time consuming. Table 4.1 p.100

29 Target-Method Match Chart
Selected Response & Short Answer Extended Written Response Performance Assessment Personal Communication Knowledge Mastry Good match for assessing mastery of elements of knowledge Good match for tapping understanding of relationships among elements of knowledge X Not a good match Can ask questions and infer mastery-time consuming Reasoning Proficiency Good match only for assessing understands of some patterns of reasoning Good match. Can provide window to reasoning proficiency Can infer some reasoning proficiency by observation Can ask student to “think aloud” and probe with follow-up questions Skills X Not a good match. Good match. Can observe and evaluate skills as they are being performed. Strong match when skill is oral communication proficiency. Not good otherwise. Ability to Create Products Strong Match for written products. Not a good match if not a written product Good match. Can Assess the attributes of the product.

30 The Process of Developing CFAs: Laying The Standards Foundation - Steps 1-6
Step 1: Choose Important Topic Step 2: Identify Matching Priority Standards Step 3: “Unwrap” Matching Priority Standards Step 4: Create Graphic Organizer Step 5: Determine the Big Ideas Step 6: Write the Essential Questions

31 The Process of Developing CFAs: Creating The Assessment Steps 7-10
Step 7: Write Selected-Response Items Step 8: Write Constructed-Response Items (extended or short) Step 9: Write Essential Question-Big Idea Directions Step 10: Create Answer Key & Scoring Guides for Constructed-Response Items

32 CFAs – A Summary Periodic assessments collaboratively designed
Matching pre- and post-assessments Similar in design to high stakes tests Items should represent priority standards Blend of item types including selected and constructed response Administered several times a year Results analyzed in Data Teams Results used to inform planning and instruction

33 Teachers will need support with…..
Writing Common Formative Assessments How to analyze the assessments and apply to classroom instruction Instructional Strategies to add to their toolboxes Regular TIME to review data, evaluate IMPACT, modify instruction, content and assessments; and continuously reflect as professional teams.

34 What will you do to KNOW YOUR IMPACT?
What will your next steps be? GROUP DISCUSSION PERSONAL NOTES GROUP/INDIVIDUAL NEEDS??

35 WVEC – HERE TO HELP!! Tami Hicks PD Coordinator EMAIL: PHONE:
PHONE: 765-58


Download ppt "KNOW THY IMPACT: The Power of Common Formative Assessments"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google