Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

The construction of a formal argument

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "The construction of a formal argument"— Presentation transcript:

1 The construction of a formal argument
Logic The construction of a formal argument

2 Logic: the study of the correct rules of reasoning
Reason vs. Rhetoric Propositions: declarative statements that assert a claim They are either true or false Analytic vs. Synthetic propositions (Kant) analytic: predicate adds nothing to the subject E.g =4 Deductive reasoning Pure rationalism; no new information from the world Synthetic: predicate adds knowledge to subject. Conclusions come from our observation of the world E.g. “The rose is red.”

3 Induction Drawing conclusions from observation of particular cases
Scientific method Knowledge is always a matter of probability We frame expectations of future events Arguments not “valid” in formal sense; rather, “strong” or “weak” Analogical reasoning (“if it cures cancer in mice, it should cure cancer in people”) Occam’s Razor

4 abduction Reasoning “to the best explanation”
Seeks to add explanatory reason “Occam’s razor” Seek simplist explanation Is there a God? (utilizing abductive reasib)

5 Deductive reasoning {deduce: to derive a conclusion from something known)
Syllogisms: formal arguments with premises and conclusions Truth preserving (as in a mathematical equation) Validity vs. soundness A valid and sound argument should always be true Categorical syllogism A) Socrates is a man B) All men are mortal C) therefore: Socrates is mortal (valid & sound argument) A) Socrates is a dolphin B) All dolphins are mortal C) Therefore: Socrates is mortal (valid but unsound)

6 Hypothetical Syllogism forms
Modus Ponens: (affirming the antecedent) If P, then Q A) If it rains the ball game will be cancelled B) It’s raining C) the game is cancelled Modus Tallens (denying the consequent) If P, then Q; Not P; not Q B) It is not raining C) the game is not cancelled

7 Invalid Hypothetical forms
Denying the antecedent A) if P, then Q B) not P C) therefore, not Q Example A) If Mary is a mother, she is a woman B) Mary is not a mother C) Therefore, Mary is not a woman

8 Invalid Hypothetical Forms
Affirming the consequent A) If P, then Q B) Q C) therefore, P Example: If Mary if a mother, she is a woman Mary is a woman Therefore, she is a mother

9 Necessary vs. Sufficient
Necessary—”A” is required for “B” result (To earn good grades one must study diligently) Sufficient—”A” is one cause of “B” result (beheading is sufficient for death) Necessary and sufficient (For the world to be made right, Jesus must return)

10 Logical fallacies: a lifelong pursuit


Download ppt "The construction of a formal argument"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google