Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

“Modeling Neurological Disease” Fields Introductory Tutorial

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "“Modeling Neurological Disease” Fields Introductory Tutorial"— Presentation transcript:

1 “Modeling Neurological Disease” Fields Introductory Tutorial
Katie A. Ferguson University of Toronto Toronto Western Research Institute, UHN May 17, 2012 Fields Introductory Tutorial Part of Thematic Program: “Towards Mathematical Modeling of Neurological Disease from Cellular Perspectives”

2

3 Schizophrenia and fast-spiking interneurons
Schizophrenia is a mental disorder that affects approximately 1% of the population worldwide Cognitive deficits, including auditory and visual deficits Parvalbumin-positive fast-spiking (FS) interneuron Hz rhythm associated with feature binding and temporal encoding

4 Schizophrenia and NMDAR
NMDA receptor (NMDAR) antagonists mimic symptoms of schizophrenia Proposition: NMDA hypofunction is key, PV alteration is secondary Identifying potential sites of NMDAR hypofunction has been elusive

5 In PFC, the contribution of NMDARs to the activation of specific populations of neurons is poorly understood How is NMDA hypofunction linked to gamma oscillations abnormalities? (1) Examine NMDAR contribution to synaptic activation of FS interneurons and pyramidal cells (2) Look at the influence of AMPARs and NMDARs in the production of gamma

6 Identification of cell types
Figure 1 99 pyramidal cells, 68 FS cells, 45 non-FS interneurons

7 Contribution of NMDA-mediated currents to excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs)
Voltage clamp at -70mV Figure 2 A

8 Weaker synaptic NMDARs contribution in FS cells
NMDAR antagonist Figure 2 B,C,D

9 How do AMPARs and NMDARs influence the production of gamma?
Perhaps the fast EPSC kinetics in FS neurons is important for interneuron activity during pyramidal cell-FS neuron feedback loops involved in gamma oscillations How do AMPARs and NMDARs influence the production of gamma?

10 The Model What cell types to include? Size of network?
Architecture/connectivity of network? How to model cells? How to model synapses?

11 The Model What cell types to include? Size of network?
Pyramidal cells (E) and FS interneurons (I) Size of network? 200 E cells, 40 I cells Architecture/connectivity of network? E receives input from 10% of other E cells, 75% of I cells I receives input from 75% of E cells and I cells How to model cells? How to model synapses?

12 How to model cells? Izhikevich (2004) model If V≥Vspike,
White noise (E cells only) E cells only Adaptation If V≥Vspike, z→z+d, V→Vrest

13 Cell models FS interneuron model Pyramidal cell model (I cell)
(E cell) FS interneuron model (I cell) Figure 8 A

14 How to model synapses? AMPA NMDA GABA

15 Model synapses Figure 8 B

16 Fast FS neuron activation crucial for gamma
gni (FS NMDA) Figure 8 E

17 Fast FS neuron activation crucial for gamma
gni=0.002 mS/cm2 gni=0.008 mS/cm2 Total current entering I cell E cell output Synaptic output of I cell Figure 8 F,G

18 Discussion Model used to compare effects of fast AMPAR-mediated vs. slow NMDAR-mediated excitation of FS neurons on the mechanisms of gamma oscillations Model suggests rapid FS neuron activation is crucial for production of gamma oscillations Predict NMDAR hypofunction may affect PFC by acting at glutamatergic synapses different from those mediating the activation of FS parvalbumin-positive cells

19

20 Some Brief Background……
michaelscally.blogspot.com

21 Structural Rearrangement of Dentate Gyrus (DG) after brain insults
Mossy Cells (excitatory) Figures 1A,B Hilar Interneurons (inhibitory) Granule Cells (excitatory) Basket Cells (inhibitory)

22 Supp Figure 1

23 The Models Cell types Granule Cells (GC) Mossy Cells (MC)
Hilar Interneurons (HI) Basket Cells (BC) Size of network 50,000 GC, 1,500 MC, 500 BC, 600 HI Structure of cell and synaptic models Multi-compartment models (9-17 compartments) AMPA, GABA synapses Network Architecture Figure 1 A

24 Network Architecture and Analysis
(1) Control (2) Hebbian-like connectivity (3) Overrepresentation of small-motifs (4) Scale-free topology (5) Highly interconnected GC hubs without a scale-free topology Analysis (1) Latency to full network activation (2) Duration of network activity (3) Mean number of spikes fired

25 Control Network Figures 1 B,C

26 Hebbian-like network – no effect on hyperexcitability
Figures 2 A,B,C

27 Three-Neuron Motifs – no effect on hyperexcitability
Figures 2 D,E,F

28 Scale-free network enhances hyperexcitability
Figures 3 A,B,C

29 Hub Networks – enhanced hyperexcitability
Example with 210 connections for 5% of GCs (In total, created 7 networks with connections) Figures 3 D,E,F

30 Directionality of Hubs matters
Figures 4 D

31 Discussion Specific microcircuit connectivity can have important effects on epileptiform network activity In the injured dentate gyrus, the presence of a small population of highly interconnected GC hubs strongly contributes to hyperexcitability hilar basal dendrites

32 Overall Context matters!
What is the question you are trying to answer? At any level you will be introducing some assumptions (error). What makes most sense for your application?


Download ppt "“Modeling Neurological Disease” Fields Introductory Tutorial"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google