1. Peer Review of Emerging Adulthood Paper Paper Due Monday, Oct 19 before 11:59 PM

2. Did you bring your outline and list of references today? A. Brought both outline and list of references B. Brought only outline C. Brought only references D. I forgot and didn’t bring either E. I had no idea we were supposed to bring this to class

3. What is the minimum number of references required for this paper? A. 8 web sites B. 4 peer-reviewed articles C. 8 peer-reviewed articles D. 8 peer-reviewed articles + 4 web sites E. 8 books

4. APA Style for References  Journal article Burgess, S. R., Stermer, S., & Burgess, M. R. (2012). Video game playing and academic performance in college students. College Student Journal, 46(2), 376-387.  Conference Paper Smith, M. E., Nguyen, D. T., Lai, C., Leshed, G., & Baumer, E. P. (2012, February). Going to college and staying connected: Communication between college freshmen and their parents. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 789-798). ACM.  Book Arnett, J. J. (2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. Oxford University Press.

5. References must be alphabetized Conley, K. M., & Lehman, B. J. (2012). Test anxiety and cardiovascular responses to daily academic stressors. Stress And Health: Journal Of The International Society For The Investigation Of Stress, 28(1), 41-50. doi:10.1002/smi.1399 Emerging adulthood and early adulthood. (2013, December 23). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved April 14, 2014, from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title= Emerging_adulthood_and_early_adulthood&oldid=587320746 Holman, A., & Sillars, A. (2012). Talk about 'hooking up': The influence of college student social networks on nonrelationship sex. Health Communication, 27(2), 205-216. doi:10.1080/10410236.2011.575540 Jayson, S. (2012, July 30). Many 'emerging adults' 18-29 are not there yet. USA Today. Retrieved from http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/

6. Work with a partner – 10 minutes  Review your partner’s reference list  Check 1. Is it in alphabetical order? 2. Is each entry complete? (mark it if you aren’t sure) 3. Is each entry in proper APA format? (mark it if you aren’t sure) 4. Are there a minimum of 8 peer-reviewed articles from journals or conferences? 5. The reference list SHOULD NOT be numbered 6. The reference list SHOULD NOT be divided into sub- categories like “cognitive” “physical” etc. 7. Title SHOULD NOT be in all caps.

7. Report out – what did you find? A. References were not alphabetized B. There were fewer than 8 peer-reviewed references C. Alphabetized but some were not formatted correctly D. More than one of A, B, or C E. All 8 references appeared to be peer-reviewed articles and were alphabetized & in correct APA order

8. The outline should include …  A phrase or sentence at the top of the outline that describes your overall theme of your paper  Introduction: the theme of your paper and some background information on emerging adulthood  4 sections in some order – cognitive, emotional, social, physical related to your theme with at least two references linked to each section  Conclusion: a comprehensive overview of the paper; summarizes key issues and important messages of the paper. Original insights about the impact of the interrelations among the domains and the impact of that interrelation on current development as a college student and on transitions to later developmental periods.

9. Review outline - Introduction Does it briefly:  Include relevant background information on the topic and emerging adulthood?  Topic and emerging adulthood relate?  Describe how the topic will be addressed in the paper?

10. Review outline – Body of Paper For each developmental domain. Does it briefly:  Use the research (that fits the domain) and the developmental stage, correctly?  Describe the subjects of each study (two studies per domain)?  Describe the most important, relevant results of each study? Are the findings effectively integrated from the references for each domain discussed?

11. Review outline - Conclusion Does it briefly:  State key points and major messages?  Provide original insights with respect to a domain or among domains, as it relates to the topic?  Discuss how the domains may impact development as a student and transition to next stage?

12. Work with a partner – 20 minutes  Before you read each other’s outline, explain to each other the general theme of your paper. Ask each other questions if you don’t understand  Read the outline  In each of the 4 domains what do you think are the main points the person is trying to make?  Do the references make sense in the context of the theme your partner is trying to present?  Talk to each other about the strengths and weaknesses of the outline.

13. Report out – what did you find? A. Topic or relevant background information missing B. References do not fit or vaguely fit domain or development stage C. Findings from research are not well-integrated D. Key points or major messages missing E. No mention of domains on impact to students’ development

14. Review the Guidelines and Rubric Remember 600 – 1200 Words Format: Introduction, Body and Conclusion Body: Four Sections (one for each domain) Connect or bridge sections References Cited in Body and Listed on Last Page (APA style) Not a Self-Reflection but a Research Report No Direct Quotes and if you Plagiarize: 0 pts and reported to Academic Affairs Tips for a Good Score

15. Rubric for Grading Paper

23. Unacceptable Reasons for Submitting a Late Paper My internet stopped working “I submitted it at 11:59pm” “I didn’t know how to submit the paper”