1. Lansing Central School District District Assessment Results Presentation May 14, 2012 Dr. Stephen L. Grimm, Superintendent District Leadership Team 1

2. AGENDA District State Policy Overview Grades 3-8 ELA, Math All Student trends Key Findings Grades 3-8 Grade 3-8 ELA and Math results Students with Disabilities Students with Economic Disadvantage Gender Comparisons Key Findings High School Regents exam results Integrated Algebra Geometry Earth Science Living Environment Global Studies US History ELA Advanced Exams College Readiness 2

3. Changing NY State Standards ELA Regents, ELA, and Math 3- 8 Tests change; SS 5 and 8 Tests end NYS adopts ELA and Math Common Core Standards New Graduation Rates Required 2010-11 Tests stay consistent and remain aligned with 2005 NYS ELA and Math Standards Continue to develop curricula and align instruction to Common Core Standards 20011-12 CCLS aligned assessments in 3- 8 ELA and Math CCLS based curriculum models available to schools PARCC field testing for 2014 roll out Regents remain aligned to 2005 Standards 2012-13 ELA, Algebra I, and Geometry Regents exams aligned to the CCSS PARCC assessments in 2014-15? ELA and Math 3- 11? 2013-14 3

4. Grades 3-8 ELA All Students

5. Grades 3-8 Math All Students

6. High School Graduation All Students

7. District Level Key Findings Lansing teachers supported 8% (about 50) more students to proficient levels in 3-8 ELA and Math in 2011. All students meet the higher proficiency standards at rates of 73% and 78% in grades 3-8. Graduation rates have fluctuated 5 % (5 students) every year, but remain among the highest in the area. In grades 3-8, proficiency gaps of 24%-28% persist between students from low income families and all other students. In grades 3-8, proficiency gaps of 61-64% persist between students with disabilities and all other students

8. District Level Next Steps Summer 2012 and 2012-13 C and I work: ▫Alignment of curriculum and instruction with the NYS Common Core Learning Standards and Instructional Shifts ▫Local and regional assessment development ▫Prioritized learning standards ▫Data informed instruction ▫Targeted instructional interventions for students and student groups ▫Collaborative and workshop based professional learning around effective instruction for all students.

9. AGENDA DistrictGrades 3-8 Grade 3-8 ELA and Math results Students with Disabilities Students with Economic Disadvantage Gender Comparisons Key Findings High School 9

10. Grades 3-8 ELA All Students

11. Grades 3-8 ELA Students with Disabilities

12. Grades 3-8 Students from Economically Disadvantaged Families

13. Grades 3-8 ELA Gender Comparison

14. Grades 3-8 Math All Students

15. Grades 3-8 Math Students With Disabilities

16. Grades 3-8 Math Students from Economically Disadvantaged Families

17. Grades 3-8 Math Gender Comparisons

18. RC Buckley Level Key Findings Our students receive a quality education and we have excellent teachers. RC Buckley students made Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and are considered In Good Standing in both ELA and Math (All students, white students and economically disadvantaged students). Students who are economically disadvantaged and have a disability tend to score a high 1 or low 2 on both ELA and Math. The is a growing gap between students scoring a 3 and a 4. 18

19. RC Buckley Level Next Steps Continuous professional development. Continuous curriculum improvement and alignment. Continued support for programs, materials and supplies to assist our students at risk – morning/ afterschool homework club, school supplies, materials for instruction) clubs and opportunities for students. Continued support for enrichment opportunities for our all of our students to be able to reach their potential and beyond. Review and update our strategic plan to match our current needs. 19

20. Middle School Key Findings LMS continues to improve in both ELA and math scores for students in all grades. “All Students” scores were higher than all schools in the area at all grade levels. Scores for low SES students and Special Education students continue to lag behind the rest of our population.

21. Middle School Next Steps Continued focus on Professional Development including district and grant funded opportunities for teachers this summer Further development of literacy training and initiatives – Wilson Just Words, Literacy Team, Seven Valleys Writing Project Continued development of the After School Program for Identified Students – grant funded Establishment of true RTI process with range of full interventions and evaluative tools in place Continued development of the Cooperative Co- teaching model

22. AGENDA DistrictGrades 3-8High School Regents exam results Integrated Algebra Geometry Earth Science Living Environment Global Studies US History ELA Advanced Exams College Readiness 22

36. High School Key Findings Lansing NYS Regents scores exceeded scores in the TST and NYS region. Lansing mastery level regents scores, 85-100 were above in all areas but one, Chemistry, by 1%. SAT scores in both Reading and Math have been on a five year increase. ACT scores show high % of students that are ready for college course work. AP test scores of 3 or more exceed NYS and country by an average of 30%. Lansing students are exceeding in all areas of testing both locally and state wide.

37. High School Next Steps Continue to create and maintain small work group environments for students with academic needs. Grow the RTI and SST process to support all students. Continue to improve on alternate and cohesive ways of learning including, PLATO, co-teaching, and differentiated instruction. Working with the 2012-13 NYS mandates, create and implement, SLO’s and local assessments that help positive student learning.

38. Conclusions Focus Funding Opportunity