2. AB 1548 calls upon the Secretary for Environmental Protection and the California Integrated Waste Management Board, in cooperation with Resources Agency, State Department of Education, State Board of Education, and Secretary for Education, to: Develop education principles and concepts for the environment for elementary and secondary schools Incorporate the education principles and concepts for the environment for in criteria developed for textbook adoption in Science, Mathematics, English/Language Arts, and History/Social Sciences. Ensure education principles and concepts for the environment are aligned to the academic content standards adopted by the State Board of Education and do not duplicate or conflict with any academic content standards. Develop and disseminate a “model curriculum” to teach the environmental principles and concepts Education and the Environment Initiative

3. Education Partnership Sponsors Terry Tamminen Linda Moulton-Patterson Cal/EPA CIWMB Managers Andrea Lewis Bonnie Bruce Cal/EPA CIWMB Government Partners Associate Partners Standards Alignment Teams Technical Working Groups Technical Experts Technical Consultants Gerald A. Lieberman, Ph.D. and Jennifer Rigby External Stakeholders

4. Review of draft environmental principles and concepts: Technical Working Groups — June, July, August On-line discussion forum — August-November Distributed at California Science Teachers Association annual conference in San Jose Electronically distributed to over 1,000 educators Review Process — July—November

5. ALIGNMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PRINCIPLES & CONCEPTS TO CALIFORNIA’S ACADEMIC CONTENT STANDARDS

6. Standards Alignment Maps The alignment between the EP&C and California’s academic content standards were considered appropriate if they met one or more of the following criteria: 1.directly teach the standard; 2.provide the context to help students understand the standard; or, 3.help students perceive the significance of the standard to their daily lives.

7. Review of draft standards alignment maps: Standards Alignment Teams — science and history/social science identified in cooperation with the staff of the Curriculum Commission Distributed at California Science Teachers Association annual conference in San Jose Five regional field reviews with K-12 educators (Los Angeles, Orange County, San Diego, Bay Area, Sacramento/Central Valley & Redding) On-line discussion forum — October-November Three regional orientation sessions for environmental organizations/education providers (Los Angeles, Bay Area and Central Valley) Electronically distributed to over 1,000 educators Review Process — October—November

8. External Review and Outreach Educators and Administrators RegionLocationDates and Times Los AngelesLACOEOctober 26 4:30 – 6:30 pm San DiegoSDCOENovember 4 — 4:00 – 5:30 pm Orange CountyOCDE/Tustin USDNovember 1 — 4:00 – 5:30 pm SacramentoSCOENovember 17 — 4:00 – 5:30 pm Bay AreaLawrence Hall of ScienceNovember 10 — 3:30 – 5:00 pm ReddingTurtle Bay MuseumNovember 18 — 3:30 – 5:00 pm Environmental Educator Providers and NGOs RegionLocationDates and Times Los AngelesLA River CenterNovember 12 — 10:00-12:00 pm ClovisCenter for Adv. Research Tech.November 16 — 10:00 -11:30 am San FranciscoCrissy Field CenterNovember 9 — 2:30 – 4:00 pm

9. STATUS  NEXT STEPS

10. Implementation Plan and Timeline 2004 Environmental Principles and Concepts (EP&C) Draft "overarching" environmental principles Draft environmental principles Draft environmental concepts Review draft EP&C (external) Revise draft EP&C Standards Alignment Maps Draft standards alignment maps Review draft alignment maps (external) Revise draft alignment maps Submission for Review and Approval Submit to Secretary of CalEPA and CIWMB J F M A M J J A S O N D

11. Implementation Plan and Timeline 2005-2006 Planning of Model Curriculum Meetings with EE providers Outreach to educators Develop Scope and Sequence Plan for integrating existing materials Research and develop instructional design Develop Model Curriculum Develop and field test materials Review by Curriculum Commission Revisions Review by SBE Production 2005 2006

12. Implementation Plan and Timeline 2006-2009 Dissemination and professional development Establish and train dissemination teams Recruit educational leaders ( ± 10 per district) Conduct workshops across state Conduct follow-up sessions Evaluation Develop evaluation instruments Collect evaluation data Analyze data and report on evaluation results 2006 2009

13. Legislative Provisions for the Model Curriculum Developed by Cal/EPA and CIWMB, in cooperation with Resources Agency, State Department of Education and State Board of Education; Aligned with adopted academic content standards in Science, Mathematics, English/Language Arts, and History/Social Sciences; Reviewed by the Curriculum Development and Supplemental Materials Commission, Secretaries of Cal/EPA and Resources and, submitted to the State Board of Education for its approval; and, CIWMB pays printing costs and CDE posts and maintains on its Internet site.

14. Purpose of the Model Curriculum It will be designed to: help students achieve mastery of academic standards at each grade level with clearly defined learning outcomes that are aligned to California’s academic content standards provide a learning continuum from K-12 grade for teaching the Environmental Principles and Concepts

15. TaskTimeframe I.Establish an inter-agency Model Curriculum Planning Committee (governmental)12/04 II.Define goals and scope of model curriculum e.g., standards by grade-level1/05 III.Identify grade-level sequence of instruction to achieve mastery of academic content standards and EP&C — based on standards alignment maps 1/05-2/05 IV.Outline instructional plans that connect teaching standards and EP&C2/05-3/05 V.Interagency committee of EE providers (CEEIN members) develops self-review criteria and reporting documents —grade-level applicability; alignment to mastery of academic content standards and EP&C 12/04-1/05 VI.Invite CEEIN members and other EE providers to self-report on materials2/05-3/05 VII.Conduct educator needs assessment (10,000 teachers ) — e.g., format for Model Curriculum 3/05-4/05 VIII.Formulate process for developing writing teams for Model Curriculum3/05-4/05 IX.Compile components into draft Model Curriculum Plan3/05 X.Review draft Model Curriculum Plan with Education Partnership3/21/05 XI.Review draft with Model Curriculum Planning Committee — revise and finalize4/05 Plan for Designing the Model Curriculum