1. Proposal to Allocate Remaining 2010 Funding RTF November 2, 2010

2. Process Budget Check (About $110K uncommitted) Identify Project Options Consult Work Plan Met with Operations Committee Develop Staff Proposal RTF Consideration & Decision

3. Budget Snap Shot: As of 29 October 2010 Work Item All Allocations Unallocated End-Use Load Study - Phase 2a $ 3,000 $ 0 Review RTF deemed measures, document consistent methodology $ 223,060 $ 11,940 Develop Simplified M&V protocols and/or calculators for non-deemable measures $ 226,850 $ 8,150 Identify Measures and M&V Protocols that are applicable to small and/or rural utilities $ 60,000 $ 0 Provide Technical Support to the Ductless Heat Pump Evaluation. $ 5,000 $ 0 Support & Review Heat Pump Water Heater Research. $ 5,000 $ 0 Develop consistent methodology for assigning EUIs to commercial buildings $ 0 $ 10,000 Respond to NEET Recommendations for the RTF. $ 5,000 $ 0 Support Roof Top HVAC Work - Commercial Economizer Phase 3. $ 37,500 $ 0 Support Development of Savings Methodologies for Rooftop HVAC. $ 0 $ 5,000 Overhaul RTF Website. $ 10,000 $ 0 PTR Support. $ 15,000 $ 0 Regional Conservation Progress Tracking $ 5,000 Measure and Technology Reviews. (for RFQs) $ 162,275 $ 37,725 IT M&V Protocol Review and Adoption $ 0 $ 20,000 Member & Corresponding Member Special Project Support. $ 42,000 $ (7,000) Member RTF Meetings. $ 54,500 $ 10,500 RTF Meetings (Minutes and lunches) $ 18,000 $ 2,000 Contract Management. $ 40,000 $ 10,000 RTF Management. $ 25,000 $ 0 Total $ 937,185 $ 113,315

4. Project Options Considered ItemOption 1Hire VBA Programmer to automate ProCost post-processing functions 2Catalog RTF business practices 3Analysis of Package Roof Top Signature Protocol for heat pump systems 4Implement recommendations made under the deemed measure review contract 5Perform reviews on additional deemed measures 6Build calculators that result from Simplified M&V protocol project 7Create Simplified M&V Protocols for additional measures 8Measure Cost Review and Guidelines 9Measure Life Review and Guidelines 10Measure Load Shape Review and Guidelines

5. Considerations Near-term ability to develop SOW & contract Immediacy of need Opinion of RTF committees & staff Estimated Cost Details: Fall 2010 Allocating Proposal.xlsxFall 2010 Allocating Proposal.xlsx

6. Staff Recommendations ItemOptionRec 1Hire VBA Programmer to automate ProCost post-processing functions $10,000 2Catalog RTF business practices $20,000 3Analysis of Package Roof Top Signature Protocol for heat pump systems $37,000 4Implement recommendations made under the deemed measure review contract $20,000 5Perform reviews on additional deemed measures Defer 2011 6Build calculators that result from Simplified M&V protocol project $20,000 7Create Simplified M&V Protocols for additional measures Defer 2011 8Measure Cost Review and Guidelines Defer 2011 9Measure Life Review and Guidelines Defer 2011 10Measure Load Shape Review and Guidelines Defer 2011 Total $107,000

7. Proposal Direct staff to initiate scopes of work and contracts for recommended projects Total package up to remaining 2010 budget (approx $110,000) Approve sole source recommendation for work identified for SBW Allow staff the flexibility to mix and match among projects depending on final scope and cost estimates

8. Spare

9. Test RTU Signature Protocol on Heat Pumps Add heat pumps (HPs) with web-enables T-Stat – Anomalous performance data on 10 HP in BPA project Research Questions: How well will protocol work on HP systems? – Sufficiency of daily average temp – Many months with AM heating & PM cooling – Other HP-specific issues? Propose to install monitoring on a new site – 3 HPs for initial 24 months – Potential ETO site in Beaverton, OR – 20,000sf veterinary hospital, each HP serves single zone Data to be added to Regional RTU Research Results Database Analysis: Similar to previous, added report for heat pump-specific issues and findings

10. RTU Signature Protocol Test for Heat Pump Systems