1. Focusing the Power Plan What did we learn from public comment? How do we incorporate it?

2. Northwest Power Planning Council Issues for the Fifth Power Plan Issue paper identified 9 issues and asked –Are these the right issues? –Are they described accurately? –Are there others we should consider? –Where’s the priority?

3. Northwest Power Planning Council 1. Incentives for development of generation 1990’s – low power prices, regulatory uncertainty, immature market -- power plant construction didn’t keep pace with load growth Price spikes of 2000-2001 resulted in new construction – most of which will be completed by 2003 Then what? How do we assure adequate levels of development ?

4. Northwest Power Planning Council 2. Increasing the price responsiveness of demand Most commodities, demand drops with higher prices – limiting how far prices rise Electricity – –Most demand does not see effect of higher wholesale prices until after the fact –Little discipline on prices How can we increase the price-responsiveness of demand in ways that are effective and acceptable? Supply Quantity Wholesale Price Non-price responsive retail demand Price responsive retail demand Price mitigation

5. Northwest Power Planning Council 3.Sustaining economically- efficient investment inefficiency Investment in efficiency followed roller-coaster pattern –Low market prices – lower than cost-effective investment –High prices – Crash programs Would sustained investment at cost-effective levels make sense? If so, how can region achieve it ? Systems benefits charges, alternative rate setting …? Northwest Utility Annual Conservation Savings Approximate cost- Effective levels * * Estimated

6. Northwest Power Planning Council 4. Assessing supply adequacy and market performance 2000-2001 highlighted need for timely, accurate information to assess power supply adequacy and market performance Such information can now be difficult to obtain Council will assess data needed for planning and market assessment and make recommendations for obtaining that data

7. Northwest Power Planning Council 5. Fish operations and power 2000-2001 electricity crisis forced trade-offs that improved power supply at expense of fish Progress on preceding issues should reduce need for such trade- offs But conflicts likely to persist Affects incentives for other resources Are there operational strategies and/or incentives to minimize impacts on fish recovery and mitigate impacts?

8. Northwest Power Planning Council 6. Transmission Transmission policy and planning critical to maintaining adequate, efficient, economic and reliable power system Separation of generation and transmission – Disaggregated decision-making Regional Transmission Organization addressing issues, but will be several years before formed, if ever Council will address alternatives for transmission pricing, planning, and policy affecting Council’s mission

9. Northwest Power Planning Council 7.Value of/barriers to resource diversity Most new and planned generation natural gas fueled Would there be a value to a more diverse resource mix? Are there barriers to alternative generation and generation substitutes? If so, how could they be remedied – e.g. locational pricing, interconnection policies…? Wind Other Natural Gas New and Planned NW Capacity* * Operational, under-construction, permitted, permits pending and planned projects

10. Northwest Power Planning Council 8. Future role and Obligations of the BPA Many question Bonneville’s acquisition of new resources to serve growing loads in terms of: –Exposure to risk; effect on competitive wholesale power market; obscuring real cost of serving growing demand Limiting acquisition authority means limiting ability to serve growing public agency loads Customer groups currently working on proposals for long term allocation of Bonneville’s existing power Council to evaluate pros and cons, make recommendation

11. Northwest Power Planning Council 9.Climate change risks to power system Climate change poses risks to the power system –Impact on hydro system capability –Impact of possible future climate change mitigation measures on power system costs, resource choices Plan will assess impacts and effect of strategies to address climate change impacts, e.g. carbon tax

12. Northwest Power Planning Council Public comment Council received over 20 written comments Took comment from 7 organizations at meetings in Eugene and Boise Power Committee held consultations with Bonneville, utility groups, environmental groups, industrial customers, state regulators Individual members consulted with groups in their states

13. Northwest Power Planning Council What did we hear? Don’t… Spend a lot of time on transmission EXCEPT –IRP for transmission – assess role of conservation, demand management, distributed generation as alternatives to transmission investment Try to solve global climate change BUT –Should be considered as source of risk

14. Northwest Power Planning Council 1. Do… Describe and make sense of what happened over last few years – –The mix and tension between competition and regulation Describe the current context, the situation in which utilities find themselves. Develop a vision for the future of the industry in the NW Explore how to get there

15. Northwest Power Planning Council 2. Do… Engage the Bonneville future issue –“Should be the centerpiece of the Plan” – Engage particularly on those issues central to Council’s responsibilities Conservation, fish and wildlife, potential effects on the federal system The counter view – Don’t mess it up!

16. Northwest Power Planning Council 3. Do… Fish and Power Industry – Evaluate cost- effectiveness of fish measures Fish advocates – Plan to reliably meet fish requirements ?

17. Northwest Power Planning Council 4. Do… Produce the data – –Demand forecasts –Fuel price forecast –Electricity price forecasts –Resource characteristics, cost, potential –Development activity –Reliability assessment And do it regularly – not tied to plan cycle

18. Northwest Power Planning Council The “Vision Thing” Where is it that this plan is trying to take the region? –The Act provides some direction, e.g. “Adequate, efficient, economic and reliable”; “Protect, mitigate and enhance” Priorities of the Act –Should there be more? Important not to mix up ends with means

19. Northwest Power Planning Council A “strawman” vision A Northwest power system that: –Provides electricity services at low cost –Provides equitable access to electricity services throughout the region –Preserves low-cost hydro for the region –Uses hydro system efficiently – Provides electricity at low environmental impact –Supports recovery of threatened and endangered species and Fish and Wildlife goals of Power Act

20. Northwest Power Planning Council Example (cont.) –Provides an acceptable level of power system adequacy and reliability, price stability OR –Provides entities means of managing supply and price risk –Implements least cost solutions to power and transmission supply problems –Supports the development, demonstration and deployment of promising new technologies

21. Northwest Power Planning Council Vision (cont.) The dangers… –Can easily be pap doesn’t provide much guidance –Can be polarizing The alternative… “When you come to a fork in the road, take it.” -- Yogi Berra Where to?

22. Northwest Power Planning Council Future Industry Structure Tying it together… Vision (with Metrics) Future Roles, Obligations Of BPA Policy Environment: EPACT FERC RTOs, SMD, States Generation Transmission Efficiency Price Responsive Demand Fish, Environment Recent History: What happened? Why? What did we learn?

23. Northwest Power Planning Council It can’t be your father’s power plan World of the Power Act envisioned centralized planning and decisions, costs and risks borne by region’s consumers World of today and tomorrow – we can do centralized planning but –decision more likely resides with individual actors utilities, independent developers, end users… –Same with costs and risks, differing risk tolerances

24. Northwest Power Planning Council Analytically how… Strategies Resource Structural/Policy Vision Data Resource characteristics, costs, potential, status, forecasts of demand, prices… Scenarios Factors outside our control Physical/Economic e.g. water, loads, fuel prices Policy, e.g. FERC and RTO, SMD, Climate Analysis Objective – measures of cost, risk, reliability Qualitative – how well do strategies satisfy the non- quantifiable elements of the vision

25. Northwest Power Planning Council Action Plan To effect preferred strategies… –Who needs to do –What –When