1. In-Delta Fish Screen Facilities Delta Wetlands Proposed Facilities and Basis for Re-Engineered Facilities

2. Webb Tract Diversions and Discharges

3. Bacon Island Diversions and Discharges Two Main Locations Re-engineered Now

4. Diversion Plan and Elevation - 5/10/01 Booster Pumps Located on New Levee Section Fish Screen

5. Proposed Fish Screen - 86 cfs each max. Hinged Pipe to Remove Screen when not in Use No Cleaning System

6. Some Existing Siphons to be Screened, but Contribution is Unclear Habitat Islands = 200 cfs (existing water right) Webb Tract = 4500 cfs 32 New Siphons/Pumps = 2750 cfs 7 Existing Siphons = 1750 cfs (or 250 cfs each???) Bacon Island = 4500 cfs 32 New Siphons/Pumps = 2750 cfs 28 Existing Siphons = 1750 cfs (or 62 cfs each??) Typical Siphons are in the 10 -20 cfs max range…They are not proposed to be enlarged ???

7. DW Proposed Design Issues/Problems Intake Screen Unproven at this Scale Fish Screen Criteria Not Met Screen Structure and Support Inadequate –Hinge, Screen, Piling, Bracing, Etc. Pipe/Pump Hydraulic Issues Settlement Impacts Levee Stability Impacts Erosion Cyclic Loads and Fatigue Retrofit of Existing Siphons Uncertain

8. Operations and Maintenance Issues Manual Cleaning is Inadequate Sedimentation and Dredging Corrosion Potential and Cathotic Protection Poor Access to Screens (cranes, boats) Difficult Underwater Inspection Settlement Monitoring and Adjustment Flow Monitoring and Data Collection Starting the Siphon Pump Maintenance

9. Hinge Design Loads and Fatigue

10. Cleaning System Failure Andreotti Fish Screen 9/98

11. Material Selection Considerations

12. Potential Environmental Issues of DW Alternative Fish Predation Larval Fish Loss Recreation/Boating Limitations Aesthetics Pump Noise Evaluation Facilities Needed Maintenance Activities Construction Impacts Water Quality at Discharge Stations

13. Old Siphon Pipe Adequacy Electrical Requirements for Automation Site Issues Structural Adequacy Uncertain Retrofit of Existing Facilities for Screening

14. Siphon Screen Example Horseshoe Bend (30 cfs)

15. Fish Screen Criteria Drove Alternative Facilities Design at Intake Site Screen area inadequate for manual cleaning Screen mesh is too large Screens over 40 cfs subject to hydraulic uniformity and siting criteria Not a “Distributed Intake” concept

16. Potential Benefits of Re-Engineered Consolidated Facility Operations Maintenance Structural Integrity Hydraulic Improvements

17. CCWD Los Vaqueros Intake Old River Pump Station Example of Consolidated Facility

19. RD108 830 cfs Sac. River Example of Consolidated Facility