Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presented at the MCRI Workshop May 2009 by Dr. Megan E. Bradley Full Implementation Results for General Frostburg State University MCRI Workshop.

Published byLaureen Long Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Presented at the MCRI Workshop May 2009 by Dr. Megan E. Bradley Full Implementation Results for General Frostburg State University MCRI Workshop."— Presentation transcript:

1 Presented at the MCRI Workshop May 2009 by Dr. Megan E. Bradley Full Implementation Results for General Psychology @ Frostburg State University MCRI Workshop May 29, 2009 Primary FSU NCAT Team: Megan E. Bradley, Ph.D. Bill Southerly, Ph.D. Cindy D. Hay, MDE & MS Joseph Hoffman, Ph.D. John Bowman, Ph.D.

2 Presented at the MCRI Workshop May 2009 by Dr. Megan E. Bradley Psyc150: General Psychology Frostburg State University in Frostburg, Maryland Annual enrollment: About 900 Mostly traditional students and 1 st year students Required course for Psychology Majors and 5 other majors Replacement Model

3 Presented at the MCRI Workshop May 2009 by Dr. Megan E. Bradley Impact on Student Learning General Psychology Students

4 Presented at the MCRI Workshop May 2009 by Dr. Megan E. Bradley Pilot Comparisons N compared to prior # ADMIT GPA*FSU GPA* Traditional16% smaller3.112.76 Redesign100% larger2.922.17 *Significantly different; p =.005 (eta 2 =.027), p =.000 (eta 2 =.075)

5 Presented at the MCRI Workshop May 2009 by Dr. Megan E. Bradley Pilot Results: 50 Question Common Comprehensive Final Exam* Mean Test Scores *A one-way ANOVA of section on final exam percentage grades was significant, F = 23.251, p =.000, eta 2 =.090. Also significant with GPA as covariate: F = 29.192, p =.000, eta 2 =.11. *Instructors blind to exam content

6 Presented at the MCRI Workshop May 2009 by Dr. Megan E. Bradley Pilot Results: 50 Question Common Comprehensive Final Exam SectionAdmit GPAFSU GPAMean % on Final Exam Section 1 Traditional 3.022.7267.5% Section 2 Traditional 3.212.8169% Section 3 Redesign 2.952.4675.3% Section 4 Redesign 2.892.0875%

7 Presented at the MCRI Workshop May 2009 by Dr. Megan E. Bradley Pilot Results: 50 Question Common Comprehensive Final Exam Final exam scores positively correlated with average scores on MQs r =.523, p =.000

8 Presented at the MCRI Workshop May 2009 by Dr. Megan E. Bradley Pilot Results: Extra Credit Final Exam Essay Question on Prejudice Assessment #2: Comparison of extra credit essay question on final exam All instructors blind to exam content Question: Discuss the psychological phenomenon of prejudice. In your answer, feel free to reflect on causes/explanations, consequences of being a victim of prejudice, and/or ideas to counter prejudice.

9 Presented at the MCRI Workshop May 2009 by Dr. Megan E. Bradley Assessment #2: Comparison of extra credit essay question on final exam Scoring rubric emphasized use of psychological concepts No upper limit for scores 1 point per correct use of psychological concepts 1 point per accurate definition of terms 1 point per additional psychological concept Pilot Results: Extra Credit Final Exam Essay Question on Prejudice

10 Presented at the MCRI Workshop May 2009 by Dr. Megan E. Bradley Mode Traditional = 0 or 1 Redesign = 1, 2, 2, 3 *A one-way ANOVA of section on essay grades was significant, F = 6.787, p =.000, eta2 =.153. Pilot Results: Extra Credit Final Exam Essay Question on Prejudice Mean Test Scores

11 Presented at the MCRI Workshop May 2009 by Dr. Megan E. Bradley Essay score positively correlated with Grade on semester long prejudice project r =.328, p =.000 Grade across all online discussions r =.244, p =.005 Pilot Results: Extra Credit Final Exam Essay Question on Prejudice

12 Presented at the MCRI Workshop May 2009 by Dr. Megan E. Bradley Pilot Redesign Issues & Implementation Solutions Increase use of more learning principles Spacing effect: 3 unit exams Deeper learning: Reduced overall coverage “Deadline Disorder” Reduced to: MQs, Discussions, Prejudice Activity 2 weeks to complete

13 Presented at the MCRI Workshop May 2009 by Dr. Megan E. Bradley Pilot Redesign Issues & Implementation Solutions Students not ready for blended design “Freshmen don’t do optional” + “Students need structure” Required computer lab 1x/wk Students needed more in-class assistance Updated our online instructor’s manual to include brief direct instruction

14 Presented at the MCRI Workshop May 2009 by Dr. Megan E. Bradley Pilot Redesign Issues & Implementation Solutions Need for more campus-wide support Held 3 workshops on redesign Implemented student support services programs Tutoring, Supplemental Instruction ORIE + Learning Communities Wellness initiative

15 Presented at the MCRI Workshop May 2009 by Dr. Megan E. Bradley Full Implementation Results: 43 Common Questions (3 exams)* *A one-way ANOVA of section (3 total) on common question percentage was significant, F = 25.852, p =.000, eta 2 =.825. Mean Test Scores *Instructors blind to exam content

16 Presented at the MCRI Workshop May 2009 by Dr. Megan E. Bradley Factually-Based versus Conceptually-Based Questions *Factual: F = 18.480, p =.000, eta 2 =.771 Conceptual: F = 23.941, p =.000, eta 2 =.813 Mean Test Scores

17 Presented at the MCRI Workshop May 2009 by Dr. Megan E. Bradley Mode Pre-Essay = 0 or 1 Post-Essay = 0,1, 2, 3, 4 *A one-way repeated measures ANOVA on essay grades was significant, F = 230.71, p =.000, eta2 =.420. Full Implementation Results: Pre vs. Post Prejudice Essay Mean Test Scores

18 Presented at the MCRI Workshop May 2009 by Dr. Megan E. Bradley Essay score positively correlated with Grade on semester long prejudice project r =.119, p =.030 Full Implementation Results: Pre vs. Post Prejudice Essay

19 Presented at the MCRI Workshop May 2009 by Dr. Megan E. Bradley DWF Rate Previous average: 12.5% 18% prior to pilot Pilot Semester Traditional sections: 4% Redesign sections: 22% Full Implementation - Fall 12.8%

20 Presented at the MCRI Workshop May 2009 by Dr. Megan E. Bradley Impact on Student Learning ULAs

21 Presented at the MCRI Workshop May 2009 by Dr. Megan E. Bradley ULA Benefits “Field Experience” course for top students Leadership in Psychology Certificate Program Interning as a ULA Research experience included

22 Presented at the MCRI Workshop May 2009 by Dr. Megan E. Bradley ULA Benefits Future opportunities Graduate School Teaching or Research Assistantship Prestigious Internships Most recent: Leadership Institute

23 Presented at the MCRI Workshop May 2009 by Dr. Megan E. Bradley Cost Savings Plan: $89 to $32 Reality: $89 to $26 Reason: Only 50% of ULAs getting paid Biggest cost effectiveness: Tripling capacity in class Staffing

24 Presented at the MCRI Workshop May 2009 by Dr. Megan E. Bradley Cost Savings Use of savings Realized: Communication Response System Implementation (“clickers”) Laptop lab Future sustainability Support to Chair?

25 Presented at the MCRI Workshop May 2009 by Dr. Megan E. Bradley Special Thanks Our administrative team…for the support Joseph Hoffman & John Bowman USM…for seizing an opportunity Don Spicer & Nancy Shapiro Board of Regents NCAT…for the vision, knowledge & skills Carol Twigg & Carolyn Jarmon

Download ppt "Presented at the MCRI Workshop May 2009 by Dr. Megan E. Bradley Full Implementation Results for General Frostburg State University MCRI Workshop."

Similar presentations

REDESIGNING GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY at Frostburg State University Dr

REDESIGNING GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY at Frostburg State University Dr
FINAL PROPOSALS Due July 15, 2007 Application Narrative Select a redesign model: how you will embody the Five Principles Modularization: greater flexibility.

FINAL PROPOSALS Due July 15, 2007 Application Narrative Select a redesign model: how you will embody the Five Principles Modularization: greater flexibility.
R EDESIGN OF G ENERAL P SYCHOLOGY Getting Started on Course Redesign NOVA, 10/21/11 Dr. Megan E. Bradley, Professor of Frostburg State University.

R EDESIGN OF G ENERAL P SYCHOLOGY Getting Started on Course Redesign NOVA, 10/21/11 Dr. Megan E. Bradley, Professor of Frostburg State University.
READINESS CRITERIA What does it mean to be ready to do a major course redesign? Is your institution ready? Which courses are readyi.e., are good candidates.

READINESS CRITERIA What does it mean to be ready to do a major course redesign? Is your institution ready? Which courses are readyi.e., are good candidates.
WHATS NEXT? November 17, 2006 Deadline for submitting Course Readiness Instrument Establish institutional teams January 22, 2007 Workshop #2: Developing.

WHATS NEXT? November 17, 2006 Deadline for submitting Course Readiness Instrument Establish institutional teams January 22, 2007 Workshop #2: Developing.
Learner-Centered Education Course Redesign Initiative Builds upon work of prior LCE grants Will award 10-15 grants of $40,000 - $50,000, with the option.

Learner-Centered Education Course Redesign Initiative Builds upon work of prior LCE grants Will award grants of $40,000 - $50,000, with the option.
Structured Learning Assistance. SLA Objectives Increase the number of students completing developmental requirements and earning their core mathematics.

Structured Learning Assistance. SLA Objectives Increase the number of students completing developmental requirements and earning their core mathematics.
READINESS CRITERIA What does it mean to be ready to do a major course redesign? Is your institution ready? Which courses are readyi.e., are good candidates.

READINESS CRITERIA What does it mean to be ready to do a major course redesign? Is your institution ready? Which courses are readyi.e., are good candidates.
Our location is in Hattiesburg, MS Redesign Course: Nutrition Required course for 8 health profession majors 9 sections Fall and Spring; 2 sections Summer.

Our location is in Hattiesburg, MS Redesign Course: Nutrition Required course for 8 health profession majors 9 sections Fall and Spring; 2 sections Summer.
Redesigning Computer Literacy Arizona State University Tempe,Arizona Toni Farley Redesign Alliance Conference March 23, 2009 Orlando, Florida.

Redesigning Computer Literacy Arizona State University Tempe,Arizona Toni Farley Redesign Alliance Conference March 23, 2009 Orlando, Florida.
Tammy Muhs-University of Central Florida

Tammy Muhs-University of Central Florida
Course Redesign Mid-Course Assessment 1/18/2012. Lessons Learned from Pilot Mathematics Models diverse Emporium Replacement Linked Workshop All reported.

Course Redesign Mid-Course Assessment 1/18/2012. Lessons Learned from Pilot Mathematics Models diverse Emporium Replacement Linked Workshop All reported.
Maryland Course Redesign Initiative University of Maryland Eastern Shore Pilot Assessment Report: Principles of Chemistry I Jennifer L. Hearne, Ph.D. May.

Maryland Course Redesign Initiative University of Maryland Eastern Shore Pilot Assessment Report: Principles of Chemistry I Jennifer L. Hearne, Ph.D. May.
Welcome.  Dr. Donald Spicer, USM  The problem ◦ Large enrollment courses are almost universal and are problematic for students, faculty, and institutions.

Welcome.  Dr. Donald Spicer, USM  The problem ◦ Large enrollment courses are almost universal and are problematic for students, faculty, and institutions.
HIST 110—Europe since 1500 HIST 111--European History and Geography HIST 120—Survey of American History HIST 121—American History and Geography.

HIST 110—Europe since 1500 HIST 111--European History and Geography HIST 120—Survey of American History HIST 121—American History and Geography.
Course Redesign Bill Ganley, PhD. Professor of Economics & Finance Buffalo State College, part of the SUNY System approximately 11,000 students This Redesign.

Course Redesign Bill Ganley, PhD. Professor of Economics & Finance Buffalo State College, part of the SUNY System approximately 11,000 students This Redesign.
Introduction to Psychology: Northern Arizona University Fully implemented, 2009  2000/year foundational, survey-style class  Traditionally, 8-11 uncoordinated.

Introduction to Psychology: Northern Arizona University Fully implemented, 2009  2000/year foundational, survey-style class  Traditionally, 8-11 uncoordinated.
Janet Bond-Robinson Arizona State University Chemistry & Biochemistry Dept. Redesign GENERAL CHEMISTRY Non-science Majors Science Majors Sem I and II Engineering.

Janet Bond-Robinson Arizona State University Chemistry & Biochemistry Dept. Redesign GENERAL CHEMISTRY Non-science Majors Science Majors Sem I and II Engineering.
Redesign of PSYC 1101 into a 50% Online (Hybrid) Course Sue Spaulding, UNC Charlotte Pearson Education March 9, 2012 Boston Office.

Redesign of PSYC 1101 into a 50% Online (Hybrid) Course Sue Spaulding, UNC Charlotte Pearson Education March 9, 2012 Boston Office.
What Worked and What Didn’t MOMATYC Spring Meeting April 2, 2011.

What Worked and What Didn’t MOMATYC Spring Meeting April 2, 2011.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google