1. THE REMITTANCE SENDING PRACTICES OF IMMIGRANTS SURVEY DESIGN AND MEASUREMENT ISSUES Alan Simmons, York University, Toronto

2. Map of This Presentation 1. Background to an Experimental Survey 2. Sample Design Issues 3. Measurement Issues re  Volume of Remittances Sent  Explanatory Variables 4. Conclusions

3. 1. Background to the Survey Origin of the Survey  Canada’s commitment to the G-8 Sea Island Plan of Action in 2004  Focus: Jamaicans (Toronto) & Haitians (Montreal) Approach  Phase 1. Qualitative survey  Phase 2. Quantitative household survey (N=288)

4. 1.1. G-8 Sea Island Plan of Action (2004) “…..encourage…effective private sector led development to help alleviate poverty [and] to achieve the Millennium [Goals]….[by]: Facilitating remittances to help families and small business Improving the climate for entrepreneurs and investors Providing housing and clean water by supporting the development of local financial markets Expanding access to microfinance for entrepreneurs

5. Jamaicans Haitians

6. 1.3. Illustrative Findings Jamaican households in Toronto and Haitian households in Montreal: Remit about $200.00 CDN on each occasion that they transfer funds. Remit several times a year, with the result that each household transfers about $1,000 to $1,400 per year. Rely overwhelmingly on money transfer agencies. These agencies typically charge between 9% and 13% for their service. Feel that transfer fees are “high” and constitute a disincentive to transfer money with the frequency they would like. Transfer goods as well as money. They also contribute to collective transfers organized by community organizations, alumnae associations, and churches. Are in close (frequent and intimate) contact with remittance receivers and play a strong role jointly setting what the funds are to be used for.

7. 2. Sample Design Issues Universe: Individuals or households? Sampling: Representative or criterion? Sample Size: Smaller or larger?

8. 3. Variable Measurement Issues 3.1. Household Remittances  How much is sent?  Over what time period?  How to quantify in-kind remittances?  Contributions to collective transfers?

9. 3.2. Explanatory Variables  Financial resources of sending households  Financial obligations of sending households  Obligations to family abroad  Transnational family connections  The motives and perceptions of senders

10. 4. Conclusions Future research & policy analysis will benefit from: 1. Greater information on remittance senders 2. The use of a mix of larger/general and smaller/focused surveys 3. Attention to the measurement of transnational connections and the perceptions/goals of remittance senders in shaping the amounts remitted and what they are used for. 4. Re G-8 goals, policy analysis of ways of increasing the beneficial impacts of remittances.

11. Acknowledgements The pilot study was carried out with financial support from the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA). It was carried out by Alan Simmons (York University, Toronto), Dwaine Plaza (Oregon State University, Corvallis), and Victor Piché (University of Montreal). We are indebted to the Jamaican and Haitian households, interviewers and community organizations that participated in the study.

12. END For more information on the pilot study, see: http://www.yorku.ca/cerlac/abstracts.htm#r emittances To contact the author of this paper, write: asimmons@yorku.ca