Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Focus on “conventional” fast vessels

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Focus on “conventional” fast vessels"— Presentation transcript:

1 Hydrodynamic Design Aspects for Conventional Fast Ships Manfred Fritsch Volker Bertram

2 Focus on “conventional” fast vessels

3 Monohulls

4 Speed ranges tested at HSVA for MONOHULLS
There is considerable overlap in speed ranges Speed ranges tested at HSVA for MONOHULLS

5 Displacement ships frigates, corvettes, ... 0.3 < Fn < 0.6
good seakeeping good course-keeping low dynamic trim steep power increase V-shaped section in forebody slender waterlines round bilge with decreasing R going aft

6 Planing hulls patrol boats, S&R boats, racing yachts,...
0.8 < Fn < 1.7 low resistance at high Fn dynamic instability poor seakeeping straight sections and knuckle lines slender waterlines deadrise angle decreasing aft to L/2 then nearly constant > 10º trim wedges with adjustable tabs frequent

7 Semi-Displacement ships
patrol boats, pilot boats, pleasure craft 0.6 < Fn < 1.2 good seakeeping good course-keeping dynamic instability

8 Simple HSVA power prediction available
planing hulls PB = f(,B,V) semi-displacement hulls: PB=RT·V/(D·M) RT = CT ·½ ·V2·2/3

9 (All) designs can be improved
spray rails trim wedges appendages

10 Spray rails effective and cheap
PE w/o with Speed V [kn]

11 Sometimes considerable improvements
50 knot patrol boat with original trim wedge

12 Sometimes considerable improvements
50 knot patrol boat with modified trim wedge

13 Sometimes considerable improvements
50 knot patrol boat modified wedge + spray rails

14 Trim influences resistance
Influence of LCG

15 Recommendations for trim given
Recent designs have lower trim

16 Trim wedges frequently employed
most effective for Fn = (10% savings possible) almost no effect for Fn>1.2

17 Interceptors allow speed-dependent trim
Height of interceptor

18 Appendages influence resistance strongly
RAPP = 6%-15%RT avoid oversizing shaft brackets, bossings, rudder profiles V-brackets may have 7% higher resistance than I-brackets Align brackets with flow (CFD or experiment) power changes by 3%-5% depending on sense of propeller rotation for twin-screws shaft inclination reduces efficiency inward inclination of rudders for twin-rudder designs can increase propulsive efficiency by 3% keep strut barrels small; nose rounded or parabolic Align bilge keels with flow determine angle of attack of least resistance for non-retractable stabilizers

19 (All) Designs can be improved...
History of fast vessel project at HSVA

20 Catamarans 70% more deck area 20-80% more resistance
high transverse stability similar roll periods

21 Catamarans cover wide speed range
Displacement Fn  0.5 large platform Semi-displacement Fn  1 round-bilge or hard-chine Planing 50+ knots hard-chine waterjets

22 Simple design estimates possible
Froude number

23 Foil-assisted cats at high speeds
improved resistance improved seakeeping efficient ride-control system controllable flaps forward and aft recommended

24 Foil-assisted cats often with aft immersed

25 Seakeeping tests are sometimes performed

26 Deep-V addition serves as anti-slam device
faired knuckled

27 Longitudinal rails alternative ASD

28 Thank you all The


Download ppt "Focus on “conventional” fast vessels"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google