Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 Teacher Evaluation Leadership for Innovative Omani Schools in the 21st Century.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1 Teacher Evaluation Leadership for Innovative Omani Schools in the 21st Century."— Presentation transcript:

1 1 Teacher Evaluation Leadership for Innovative Omani Schools in the 21st Century

2 2 Responsibilities of Principals in the U.S. 1.Identify good, prospective teachers 2.Hire them 3.Support their development 4.Support the development of the team of teachers

3 3 1. Planning and Preparation Knowing student backgrounds Planning appropriate outcomes, teaching methods, assessment strategies 2. The Classroom Environment Creating a safe, fair, comfortable environment for learning Four Domains of Skills for Effective Teaching 1

4 4 Four Domains of Skills for Effective Teaching 1 (continued) 3. Instruction Making content understandable Checking for understanding Encouraging students to extend thinking 4. Professional Responsibilities Reflect on teaching Guild professional relationships Communicate with parents

5 5 Purposes of Evaluation Formative: Provide feedback to make improvements Identify areas of growth for specific teacher Identify staff development needs for school Summative: Provide feedback to make judgments about worth or success Make decisions about transferring or releasing teacher Make decisions about awards

6 6 Dimensions of Teacher Evaluation 2 FormativeSummative Purpose ImproveAdministrative decisions Type of data Detailed, diagnosticBottom line Method Either or both qualitative and quantitative Multi-method both qualitative and quantitative Source(s) Few or manyMany Administration InformalFormal, systematic  Sept. 1991, Thomas, a., University of Tennessee

7 7 Dimensions of Teacher Evaluation 2 FormativeSummative Sample TargetedRepresentative Frequency PeriodicInfrequent Time required MinimalMore time Shared with Teacher only or persons specified by teacher Decision makers & teacher  Sept. 1991, Thomas, A. University of Tennessee

8 8 Guiding Principles of an Educator Evaluation System 3 The system should: Conform to national rules and regulations. Reflect best practices. When applicable, provide adequate information for remediation, or dismissal. Include all categories of personnel. Be supported by assessment of other educational components that influence student achievement

9 9 Guiding Principles of an Educator Evaluation System 3 (continued) The system should: Meet professional standards for sound evaluation, including propriety (ethical and legal), utility (useable and effective), feasibility (practical, efficient, and cost- effective), and accuracy (valid and reliable). 2 – Be understood, credible, valued, and used. – Include formative, summative, and monitoring functions.

10 10 Guiding Principles of an Educator Evaluation System 3 (continued) Meet professional standards for sound evaluation – Based on multiple and variable data sources if for summative function. – Support fairness and promote equality of opportunity and the rights of students, educators and the institution. – Be evaluated, validated, refined and updated.

11 11 Types of Teacher Evaluation Models Individualistic, hierarchical – Clinical supervision Formal observation with pre-conference, observation, reporting, post-conference and follow-up – Peer supervision

12 12 Types of Teacher Evaluation Models (continued) Mixed model (some hierarchy, some collaborative) Collaborative, participatory team – Learning communities Lesson study Circles

13 13 Review of Principles of Adult Learning Motivation: Want useful skill or knowledge Need to retain self esteem Curriculum: Interested in application Prefer self-directed learning Seek knowledge from others

14 14 Review of Principles of Adult Learning (continued) Learning Experience: Learn from dialogue with respected peers Prefer active, problem oriented learning Seek knowledge from others

15 15 Clinical Supervision Is a series of cycles Conducted for instructional improvement Is goal oriented Assumes a professional working relationship between teacher and supervisor

16 16 Clinical Supervision (continued) Requires a high degree of mutual trust Is systematic but requires flexibility Assumes supervisor has necessary knowledge of instruction and learning and human interaction skills Assumes teachers are professionals who desire help if offered in collegial way

17 17 Steps in Clinical Supervision 1.Establish teacher-supervisor relationship 2.Pre-observation conference 3.Observation of class 4.Analyzing and interpreting observation 5.Post-observation conference Discuss data/information Review results of observation session and formulate plans

18 18 Steps in Clinical Supervision (continued) 6. Collaboratively write instructional improvement plan 7. Renewed planning Discuss the activity, what was valuable and what changes in strategies are needed

19 19 Pre-observation Conference 4 1.Purpose of the observation 2.Focus of the observation 3.Goal of the lesson 4.Teaching strategies to be used to reach goal; lesson plan 5.Observation form 6.Time of observation 7.Time for post-observation conference

20 20 Role of Supervisor (Peer) During Observation 4 Focus on the specific teaching objectives of the day Observe and record all information that addresses the behaviors discussed in the pre-observation conference Do not make value judgments. Record objective behaviors relevant to those discussed in pre-observation conference. Scripting is common technique.

21 21 Any personal comments or questions that arise for observer should be recorded separately from observation data notes. Observer should not intervene in the teacher's lesson (except in case of safety) Role of Supervisor (Peer) during Observation 4

22 22 Common Problems in Evaluation Ratings of Teachers Rater may use self as “ideal” Rater may reflect how they like the person rather than how well they teach Rater may be influenced by how others view the person rather than how well they teach Rater may not spend enough time observing or may not observe often enough

23 23 Observer’s Role in Post-observation Conference 4 Ask teacher to reflect on class observed Share observation data with teacher; describe without interpreting Discuss congruencies and discrepancies between perceptions of teacher and observer. Be sure to point out positive behaviors.

24 24 Observer’s Role in Post-observation Conference 4 (continued) Ask teacher to make suggestions about changes Observer offer suggestions or alternatives From all suggestions, reach agreement about which strategies to use in future Summarize the conference Set appointment for next conference

25 25 Approaches to Conferencing 4 1.Non-directive approach Teacher makes decisions, analyzes class and makes suggestions for improvement; supervisor (or peer) listens, clarifies, and encourages 2.Collaborative approach Shared presenting, problem-solving, negotiating and planning 3. Directive approach Supervisor (or peer) – Directs with discussion – Provides suggestions – Reinforces success – Determines plan of action

26 26 Mentoring 5 Mentoring: is a mutually agreeable relationship between a mentor (the experienced, skilled teacher) that is intended to be an on-going relationship for more than a year to assist in the professional development of the person needing or wanting assistance. A mentor: advises, guides, provides feedback, and develops instructional strategies with the teacher wanting assistance. In addition, the mentor provides information about the procedures, policies, culture, and people unique to the school.

27 27 Characteristics of Peer Mentoring Formal or informal Focuses on more than teaching (includes learning about the school resources, culture, procedures) Based on specific needs of teacher being mentored

28 28 Characteristics of Peer Mentoring (continued) Usually includes – Observation of each other’s classes (meeting before and after to discuss) – Meetings as a pair to discuss other problems and issues – Meetings of “pairs” to discuss common problems and issues Pair can be retained for 2-3 years

29 29 Responsibility of Principal in Peer Mentoring 6 Let teacher help decide on peer Require that a record is submitted of how and in what way time was used Provide necessary resources and support Request that “evaluative” information not be forwarded to principal Require a professional growth log from teacher Meet with team at least once a year Meet with peer and teacher individually once a year

30 30 Characteristics of Informal Walk-throughs 7 Collaborative professional development Short 5-15 minute classroom visits Instruction is observed Discussions held with students about what they are doing and learning Feedback provided to teachers Data gathered to inform curricular decisions Usually involves summarizing observations and sharing with all teachers for decision making

31 31 Walk-throughs 7 A means to examine instructional practice. Provides opportunity for reflection and inquiry about what occurs in classrooms. Affirms teachers’ instructional efforts. Identifies what works well and areas for modification. Provides more frequent, constructive interaction between teachers and principal. Allows for examination of instructional efforts over a longer period of time.

32 32 Walk-throughs 7 (continued) Provides opportunity for sharing of strategies among teachers. Provides more than a snapshot view of teachers at work. Easy to complete; requires minimal time. NOT formal NOT for administrative decisions; for school improvement Observation notes are NOT retained by observer

33 33 Lesson Study Steps 8 1.Group of teachers identify a problem of interest/a learning goal 2.Teachers meet to plan a lesson 3.Lesson taught 4.Lesson evaluated and group reflects 5.Lesson revised 6.Revise lesson taught 7.Teachers evaluate and reflect again 8.Teachers share with all teachers in school and other schools

34 34 Possible Sources of Ethical Issues in Teaching In-class Classroom policies Student behaviors Teaching style Evaluations and individual students Assessments Recommendation letters Biased treatment

35 35 Possible Sources of Ethical Issues in Teaching (continued) Responsibilities to students and colleagues Colleagues that do not get along Updated class plans Knowledge of subject Confidentiality Use of school resources


Download ppt "1 Teacher Evaluation Leadership for Innovative Omani Schools in the 21st Century."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google