1. Department of Intelligent Computer Systems University of Malta Writing and Referencing Dr. Chris Staff chris.staff@um.edu.mt October 2010 chris.staff@um.edu.mt University Guidelines

2. Department of Intelligent Computer Systems University of Malta Learning outcomes Learn definitions of minor/major plagiarism Academic Incompetence Collusion Checklist of good writing and referencing style Primary and Secondary sources

3. References Plagiarism and Collusion GuidelinesPlagiarism and Collusion Guidelines, University of Malta, 2009 Department of Intelligent Computer Systems University of Malta

4. Department of Intelligent Computer Systems University of Malta Major Plagiarism 1 ‘Significant unacknowledged borrowing’, e.g. “Copying text or a diagram from another source, failing to enclose the copied text within quotation marks, or taking somebody else’s ideas, and failing to correctly acknowledge the source of the text, diagram, or ideas”. “Purchasing a paper or report from a ‘paper mill’; paying others to prepare an assignment but then submitting the work under your own name”.

5. Department of Intelligent Computer Systems University of Malta Major Plagiarism 2 Continued… “Copying text but replacing some words or changing word order, whether or not the source is correctly acknowledged; re-drawing diagrams and failing to acknowledge the source”.

6. Department of Intelligent Computer Systems University of Malta Minor Plagiarism 1 Examples: “Individual in-line citations lacking corresponding entries in the references section, or failure to compile a references section”. “Demarcated text without in-line citation or instances of incomplete or inconsistent in- line citation”. “Incorrectly written entries in a reference list, when this results in the reader’s inability to create a correspondence between the entries in the reference list and in-line citations”.

7. Department of Intelligent Computer Systems University of Malta Minor Plagiarism 2 Continued… “Inconsistent citation style, when this results in the reader’s inability to identify sources”. “Unacknowledged borrowing that does not contribute significantly to the text in question”.

8. Department of Intelligent Computer Systems University of Malta Academic Incompetence Academic Incompetence is not considered plagiarism No disciplinary action taken, but may result in a reduction of marks Cases of minor plagiarism in first year assignments is commuted to Academic Incompetence, but you should receive feedback Major plagiarism always considered major plagiarism! Second case of minor plagiarism treated as major

9. Department of Intelligent Computer Systems University of Malta Collusion 1 –Collusion is unauthorised collaboration on work submitted for assessment –Assignments should clearly specify if work is individual or group work –If you’re not sure, ask the lecturer –All work performed by members of a group may need to be clearly indicated

10. Department of Intelligent Computer Systems University of Malta Collusion 2 You may usually discuss problems and possible solutions orally, even if work is individual Never share written work, code, etc., unless permitted to do so by the lecturer

11. Department of Intelligent Computer Systems University of Malta Checklist of good writing/referencing style 1 “Does the written work have a references section (either as footnotes or endnotes), if one is required by the nature of the assignment?” If there is no references section, where have you got the information from? Most of our work builds upon a body of knowledge

12. Department of Intelligent Computer Systems University of Malta Checklist of good writing/referencing style 2 “Does each bibliographic entry in the references section have an identifier so that it can be referred to from the main body of text?” If it doesn’t, how can author show which references are the source of claims made in the main body of the report? Readers may need to be able to independently verify claims made

13. Example Entries in the references section should be uniquely referable, through an identifier, e.g., [12], [Sta96], Staff, C., 1996…, etc. Department of Intelligent Computer Systems University of Malta

14. Department of Intelligent Computer Systems University of Malta Brusilovsky, P. and Sosnovsky, S. 2005. Individualized exercises for self-assessment of programming knowledge: An evaluation of QuizPACK. J. Educ. Resour. Comput. 5, 3 (Sep. 2005), 6. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1163405.1163411

15. Department of Intelligent Computer Systems University of Malta Brusilovsky, P. and Maybury, M. T. 2002. From adaptive hypermedia to the adaptive web. Commun. ACM 45, 5 (May. 2002), 30-33. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/506218.506239

16. Department of Intelligent Computer Systems University of Malta Checklist of good writing/referencing style 3 “Are the entries in the references section written consistently?” If not, perhaps the entries have been copied from different sources What else might have been copied? Can you easily tell which in-line citations refer to which reference entries?

17. Examples Reference format inconsistent: Sometimes title first, author surname first, author name first, authors with multiple publications in the same year not differentiated, author name missing, etc. Department of Intelligent Computer Systems University of Malta

18. Department of Intelligent Computer Systems University of Malta Checklist of good writing/referencing style 4 “Is there in-line citation wherever it is needed?” Are there any unsubstantiated claims? Have the claims been invented or have they been copied from a source without reference? Of course, if it is common knowledge then be prepared to defend it! If there is a references section, then there should be in-line citation Difference between references and bibliography

19. Department of Intelligent Computer Systems University of Malta Checklist of good writing/referencing style 5 “Do all citations that appear in the main body of text correctly refer to entries in the references section?” It is essential that all in-line citations have corresponding entries in the references section

20. Department of Intelligent Computer Systems University of Malta Checklist of good writing/referencing style 6 “Is the citation style consistent?” If it isn’t, perhaps the work is unduly influenced by other sources.

21. Examples Mixing numbering, APA, Harvard style references E.g., Staff [11] and Brown (Brown, 2005) claim that… Department of Intelligent Computer Systems University of Malta

22. Department of Intelligent Computer Systems University of Malta Checklist of good writing/referencing style 7 “Are all claims made either common knowledge or substantiated? A claim can be substantiated by either citing a source that verifies the claim, or by referring to a chapter/section in the student’s written work that contains the substantiation.” If a claim is unsubstantiated then was it invented? Or was it taken from a source (where it was substantiated) without due reference?

23. Department of Intelligent Computer Systems University of Malta Checklist of good writing/referencing style 8 “Is all the information provided pertinent to the assignment question, or does the written work go ‘out of point’?” A tendency to go out of point may indicate that the author is too reliant on a source.

24. Department of Intelligent Computer Systems University of Malta Checklist of good writing/referencing style 9 “Is the writing style consistent?” If not, the author may have been too closely reliant on the wording in/phraseology of the sources.

25. Example Brown proposes an eclectic model [11] so Staff doesn’t what he agrees. Department of Intelligent Computer Systems University of Malta

26. Department of Intelligent Computer Systems University of Malta Primary and Secondary Sources Primary sources are those that contain the substantiated claim or are first to make an observation Secondary sources repeat the claim/observation, normally citing the primary source (or another secondary source) A claim becomes ‘common knowledge’ when it is well known enough to not cite the source

27. Examples Staff [1] in Brown [4] claims that the choice of classroom can effect student progress. Brown [4] claims that Staff [1] has confused the issue of Shakespearian studies with classroom choice. “2B or not 2B” ([1] cited in [4])… Department of Intelligent Computer Systems University of Malta

28. Department of Intelligent Computer Systems University of Malta References How to structure a reference and other information Source: A Quick Guide to ReferencingA Quick Guide to Referencing