Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Can Apes Ape? Clues to Understanding Human Evolution David F. Bjorklund Department of Psychology Florida Atlantic University Boca Raton, FL USA.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Can Apes Ape? Clues to Understanding Human Evolution David F. Bjorklund Department of Psychology Florida Atlantic University Boca Raton, FL USA."— Presentation transcript:

1 Can Apes Ape? Clues to Understanding Human Evolution David F. Bjorklund Department of Psychology Florida Atlantic University Boca Raton, FL USA

2 Deferred (Delayed) Imitation Reproduction of observed behavior after significant time interval Involves the representation of actions held in long-term memory stores, which requires symbolic representation (Piaget; Meltzoff) May reflect declarative/explicit, as opposed to nondeclarative/implicit, memory (McDonough et al., 1995) Human infants show evidence of deferred imitation for simple actions by 9 months and for more complex actions by 18 months

3 Enculturation “Apes raised by humans in something like a human cultural environment (sometimes including exposure to or training in symbolic skills); the environment need not literally be a home but must include something close to daily contact with humans and their artifacts in meaningful interaction (Call & Tomasello, 1996) Direct teaching Language Joint-shared attention

4 Tomasello, Savage-Rumbaugh, and Kruger (1993) 3 enculturated chimps (2 bonobos and 1 common) 3 mother-reared chimps (2 bonobos and 1 common) 18- and 30-month old children 4 deferred-imitation tasks of simple tool use. Baseline, objects from 4 tasks to interact with for 4 minutes Target behavior modeled for animal 24 hour delay, animal given objects for 4 minutes and look for evidence of deferred imitation

5 Percentage of trials showing deferred imitation for children and chimps (Tomasello et al., 1993)

6 Grub

7

8

9

10

11 Kenya

12

13

14 Noelle

15

16

17 Christopher

18 Pongo

19

20 Design of Deferred Imitation Experiment (Bering, Bjorklund, & Ragan, 2000) 3 Enculturated Juvenile Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) 3 Enculturated Juvenile Orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) Sequence for Each of 7 Tasks 4-minute Baseline 5-minute Delay Demonstration of Target Behavior (6 displays) 10-minute delay 4-minute Deferred Imitation Phase

21 Scoring Target Approximation to the Target No Imitative Behavior

22

23 Percentage Deferred Imitation: Chimpanzees

24 Percentage of Deferred Imitation: Orangutans

25 Median Latencies to Imitate Target or Approximation to Target Behaviors during the Deferred Trials: Chimpanzees Grub (5 behaviors): 12.0 sec Kenya (5 behaviors): 35.0 sec Noelle (2 behaviors): 17.5 sec Group median = 17.5 sec % displayed with in 60 sec: 92% % displayed within 30 sec:67%

26 Median Latencies to Imitate Target or Approximation to Target Behaviors during the Deferred Trials: Orangutans Pongo (1 behavior):235.0 sec Ruby (3 behaviors): 95.0 sec Christopher (2 behaviors): 25.0 sec Group median = 65 sec % displayed with in 60 sec: 50% % displayed within 30 sec:33%

27 Deferred Imitation in Nonenculturated Chimpanzees Five female lab-reared chimpanzees, all long-term members of a stable social group at Yerkes Field Station Kristin Bonnie and Frans de Waal Phases 1 and 2 – Georgia:24 years, 2 month – Katie:15 years, 6 months – Anja:24 years, 10 months – Dona:14 years, 7 months Phase 3 – Rita:17 years, 1 month No evidence of immediate or deferred imitation by any animal in any phase

28 Generalization of Imitation Generalizing behaviors observed with one set of objects to similar, but not identical, objects, to achieve a goal. Such generalization requires the actor to understand that a similar goal, with a new set of objects, can be achieved by executing similar actions.

29 Design of Generalization of Imitation Experiment: Chimpanzees (Bjorklund, Yunger, Bering, & Ragan, 2002) 3 Enculturated Juveniles Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) Sequence for Each of 8 Tasks 6-minute baseline with two sets of objects (e.g., cymbals and trowels) 5-minute Delay Demonstration of Target Behavior (e.g, with cymbals) 10-minute delay 4-minute Generalization of Imitation Phase with different objects than used in demonstration 4-minute Imitation Phase with same objects used in demonstration

30

31 Percentage Imitation and Generalization of Imitation: Chimpanzees

32 Percentage of Imitation and Generalization of Imitation: Orangutans (Yunger & Bjorklund,2004)

33 Species-atypical environments for human-reared chimpanzees produced modified patterns of social cognition. What is the nature of such changes? Produce only molar (i.e., behavioral) level changes in sociality leading to enhanced learning abilities – Socialization of attention (Tomasello) – Apprenticeship hypothesis (Bering) Changes in the epigenetic system leading to the phenotypical expression of cognitive abilities that are otherwise suppressed under natural conditions

34 Chimpanzees, and likely our common ancestor with chimpanzees, possessed the necessary plasticity to modify their social cognition in response to novel environments, possibly leading to the exploration of new niches and to new selection pressures, and eventually to evolutionary changes in intelligence.

35 Epigenetic theories of evolution view a developing organism’s response to environmental changes as a mechanism for evolutionary change. Natural selection still plays an important role in evolution, but it is the developmental plasticity of an organism that provides the creative force for evolution.


Download ppt "Can Apes Ape? Clues to Understanding Human Evolution David F. Bjorklund Department of Psychology Florida Atlantic University Boca Raton, FL USA."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google