1. May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL1 Infrastructure Workgroup Heidi Sanborn, R3 Consulting Group – Facilitator Scott Cassel, PSI Dave Nightingale, WA Ecology & NW Prod. Stewardship Council – Lead, Infrastructure Alison Keane, NPCA – Lead, Reuse Dave Darling, NPCA Pamela McAuley, Hotz Environmental Mark Kurschner, Product Care Association Susan Peterson, ICI Canada Barry Elman, EPA Jen Holliday, Chittenden County, VT Theresa Stiner, IA DNR Georges Portelance, Eco-Peinture Glenn Gallagher, CIWMB Mike O’Donnell, Phillips Services Corporation Bruce Baggenstos, PDCA, California Curtis Bailey, CB Consulting Leslie Kline, Fresno County, CA Pandora Touart, City of Federal Way, WA Melanie Wheeler, NH DES

2. May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL2 Infrastructure Workgroup Projects 1.Paint Reuse Guidance (#3) 2.National Infrastructure Model (#4) 3.Infrastructure Cost Analysis (#5)

3. May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL3 Key Infrastructure Components 1.Paint Reuse Primer 2.Leftover Paint Age Profile 3.Leftover Paint Quantity Study 4.Percentage of Recyclable Paint 5.Infrastructure Cost Analysis 6.Connection to Lifecycle Assessment/Cost Benefit Analysis

4. May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL4 Project Timeline 1.SCS Engineers completed first draft - June 2005 2.4 workgroup calls since July 1, 2005 3.Gained additional funding after hiatus 4.First draft report on the “model” edited by the Workgroup and presented to SCS to finish 5.PSI research on curbside collection of latex paint forwarded to SCS about programs in Marion OR and Unincorporated Alameda County CA 6.Final report expected – September 2006

5. May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL5 Key Issues in the Draft Report 1.Leftover paint quantities 2.Collection points needed 3.Transportation and aggregation 4.Processing facilities needed 5.Facility design recommendations 6.Preliminary cost information 7.Conclusions and next steps

6. May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL6 National Infrastructure Model (#4) Goal:  Determine the most efficient leftover paint infrastructure system. Method:  Develop a report, which includes a model on how to establish a national infrastructure for paint management that will efficiently and effectively collect and manage leftover paint.  Include results from other projects, such as the Paint Reuse Manual.

7. May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL7 Leftover Paint Quantities  Paint collection = paint sales x collection rate  Paint sales = 2.3 gal/person/yr  Collection rate (based on 50% collection of leftover paint) –Low: 2.5% of paint sales –Medium: 5.0% of paint sales –High: 7.5% of paint sales –Extra High: 10.0% of paint sales  Plan for an increase in collection – phases

8. May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL8 Leftover Paint Quantities  EPA Revised Draft Report – end of May 2006??  Anything further to report?  This section is on hold until EPA report completed.

9. May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL9 Collection Points Needed  Type –Dedicated facilities –Co-located drop-off points  Number of collection and aggregation points  Community type designations 1.Super-urban (very dense cities) 2.Urban/metro areas (most other cities) 3.Isolated cities and towns (10,000-50,000) 4.Very rural (remote, sparsely populated)

10. May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL10 Approach to Estimate Number of Collection Points Needed  Service level approach – based on service at existing collection programs (people per collection point) –Need convenience within geographic area –Collection sites needed: 2,090 –Equal to 0.06 gallons/person (LOW) –Most popular approach

11. May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL11 Approach to Estimate Number of Collection Points Needed  Retail model approach – based on paint distribution to retailers –Types of distribution establishments Retail outlets Home centers Discount/Dept. stores Hardware stores Other –Number of distribution establishments: 36,773 –Collection sites needed: 12,000

12. May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL12 Approach to Estimate Number of Collection Points Needed  Incentive based approach – to encourage collection at non-profits, private, public through financial incentives  Collection point capacity approach –Based on the amount of throughput to a facility (contingent on space available) –Reverse logic –Not considered valid approach –Collection sites needed: 5,000-10,000

13. May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL13 Recommendations: Collection Points  Collection sites needed: 2,000 oEqual to 0.06 gallons/person (LOW)  Collection sites needed: 5,000 oEqual to 0.17 gallons/person (HIGH)  Collection sites needed: 8,000 oUltimate convenience  Existing collection sites in US o1,500+ (Earth 911 data)

14. May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL14 Transportation and Aggregation  Assumption: each community type will need at least one aggregation point  TOTAL: 934 aggregation points  Did not include backhauling in discussion  Next steps: –Develop cost to aggregate and transport –Ensure that all transportation types are evaluated –Check assumption of one aggregation point per community type

15. May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL15 Processing Facilities  Surveyed 7 of 9 PPSI paint processors  All have extra capacity  Additional capacity considerations: –Population density (supply) –Transportation costs (distance for supply to travel) –End-customer (distance for the final product to travel)  Primary barrier to adding new capacity: markets  Paint processing facilities needed: 3-17

16. May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL16 Facility Design Parameters Based on Paint Management Hierarchy Should percentages be changed?  20% of paint is reused through paint swaps  65% is recycled into new paint  8% downcycled into cement additive  7% disposed

17. May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL17 Curbside Paint Collection Marion County, Oregon  Marion County OR has collected paint at curb since 2000  2004 – recycled 15,228 gallons  2005 – recycled 28,695 gallons  Paint is put into “tubs” with other recyclables including oil, batteries, glass, and automotive fluids  Only 2 gallons of paint per collection  “Tub” is collected bi-weekly

18. May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL18

19. May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL19 Hauler Fabricated “Belly Box”

20. May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL20 Marion County, Oregon Collection Truck – Front Rack - Unloading

21. May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL21 PaintBack Crew Mixing Paint

22. May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL22

23. May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL23 Details of Curbside Collection in Marion County, Oregon  Don’t break-out costs for paint collection from other materials in the bin  Cost to retrofit truck  $2,000  Cost to mix paint  $0 – use juvenile detainee labor  Use paint for municipal purposes and donate the rest to the public  Labor, equipment, advertising, cost of buckets per year equates to $0.63 per gallon to manage !

24. May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL24 Infrastructure Cost Analysis (#5) Goal:  Determine the cost to implement the Infrastructure Model over a 5-year period on a national scale. Method:  Conduct a detailed analysis of costs pertaining to collecting, reusing, consolidating, transporting, recycling, and disposing of leftover paint, as well as capital and administrative costs.

25. May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL25 Connection to LCA/CBA  The infrastructure project can share data with the lifecycle project where there is overlap.  SCS and ERG conference call confirmed that SCS can deliver data needed for the LCA project in time to complete the LCA/CBA by November.  Consultants confident that projects will work well together.

26. May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL26 Types of Data to be Shared  Collection Data –Representative Transportation Distances Consumer’s Home to HHW Facility HHW Facility to Processing Facility HHW Facility to Recycling Facility –What Regions/Populations densities do these distances apply?  Facility Data –Operational Costs Utilities, Raw Materials, Labor –Construction Costs Equipment, permitting, land and building costs

27. May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL27 Ongoing Research Being Tracked  New Hampshire/Paint Recycling Company Pilot  Chittenden County VT/ Paint Recycling Company Pilot  Florida milk-run collection pilot  NCPD projects

28. May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL28 New Hampshire: Exporting Post Consumer Paint for Recycling  Project Manager is Melanie Wheeler of the State of NH Grant Program  Objective is to determine economic and administrative feasibility of collecting paint and exporting to Canada (Paint Recycling Company) for recycling.  Performance will be measured by comparing cost savings per gallon to existing program which sends it to incineration.  Project will be considered successful if the cost of export for recycling is the same or less than the cost of incineration.  Will be reviewed by Infrastructure Group for incorporation of any new data into the Infrastructure Model.

29. May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL29 New Hampshire – Pilot Project Results  Project completed fall of 2004  Total paint collected 2,094 gallons of paint  Cost to recycle $7,712.25* or $3.68 per gallon  Avoided cost to incinerate approx. $14,000 or $7.40/gal.  Savings of approx. $7,000 (50 percent)  Positive results are in spite of barriers, including: –200 miles to transport –Export rules between US and Canada * Includes transportation costs

30. May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL30 Chittenden VT and Paint Recycling Company – Pilot Project  Project Manager - Jen Holliday, Chittenden Solid Waste District  Objective - Collecting paint and shipping to Paint Recycling Company for recycling.  Goal - Testing to see if paint recycling is more cost effective than disposal

31. May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL31 Chittenden VT and Paint Recycling Company Pilot Project  FY 2004 and FY 2005 results  Compared costs of landfilling to paint consolidation into own product called “Local Color” or export to Canadian paint recycler  Shipped total of 9,811 gallons of paint  Costs per gallon –Landfill  Cost $2.63/gallon –Export and Recycle  Cost $1.70/gallon –Consolidate and Sell  PROFIT $0.79/gallon

32. May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL32 Florida Milk-run Pilot  Rural milk-run collections  Future project - has not received funding to date  Hope to implement late 2006/early 2007  Goal is to provide a $50,000 grant to fund “milk-runs” where rural areas can have an outlet for paint to be recycled and then to evaluate the success of the project by comparing the cost to collect and recycle paint against current management methods.

33. May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL33 National Council on Paint Disposition (NCPD) Collection Project  Project manager is NCPD, Marv Goodman  Transportation and collection currently underway  Other portions are being evaluated through Project Engineers at Rutgers University for feasibility  May need additional funding

34. May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL34 Questions  What data do we need to start the discussions on Oct. 1, 2006 regarding the development and financing of the nationally coordinated paint management system for leftover paint?  Will the current Scope of Work ensure delivery of that data?

35. May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL35 Infrastructure Workgroup Heidi Sanborn, R3 Consulting Group – Facilitator Scott Cassel, PSI Dave Nightingale, WA Ecology & NW Prod. Stewardship Council – Lead, Infrastructure Alison Keane, NPCA – Lead, Reuse Dave Darling, NPCA Pamela McAuley, Hotz Environmental Mark Kurschner, Product Care Association Susan Peterson, ICI Canada Barry Elman, EPA Jen Holliday, Chittenden County, VT Theresa Stiner, IA DNR Georges Portelance, Eco-Peinture Glenn Gallagher, CIWMB Mike O’Donnell, Phillips Services Corporation Bruce Baggenstos, PDCA, California Curtis Bailey, CB Consulting Leslie Kline, Fresno County, CA Pandora Touart, City of Federal Way, WA Melanie Wheeler, NH DES

36. May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL36 Overview – Reuse Guidance Manual 1.Identifies types of reuse programs as either paint exchanges, donation/resale, or bulking 2.Asks reader to identify the goals of their program and choose an infrastructure (permanent/temporary) 3.Identifies federal, state, and local regs. to consider 4.Describes operational needs for facilities and staff 5.Encourages a container management plan 6.Encourages a marketing strategy 7.Provides case studies and resources for further information

37. May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL37 Reuse Guidance Manual Goal:  Encourage HHW collection programs to start and/or expand paint reuse opportunities to maximize reuse and reduce paint management costs. Method:  Develop guidance manual on paint reuse for states, municipalities, non-profit and/or other material reuse organizations, and other businesses and consumers.  Conduct significant outreach once manual is completed.

38. May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL38 Work Accomplished to Date  Three conference calls.  Completed reuse manual.  Draft Final Report available for release.  No funding remaining on project.

39. May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL39 PPSI Feedback  Is there any other information that should be included in the document?  Do you have any editing/formatting suggestions?  Do you have any suggestions for additional resources?

40. May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL40 Next Steps  Circulate draft final to PPSI for comments  Circulate to HHW, PSI, SWANA and state waste management list serves for review and feedback  After public review and comment, finalize  Post on PSI, NPCA websites – link to Earth 911  Additional Promotion of Manual?

41. May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL41 Decisions  Is this document ready to send to the full PPSI for review and comment?  Do we need to develop and fund a pilot project as part of the outreach component to test the effectiveness of the document?  If not, how do we evaluate the success of the manual?  Is there an opportunity to tie this in with other educational outreach?  How do we get additional work done with no funding?