1. Chapter 53: Community Ecology

2. Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings When Connell removed Balanus from the lower strata, the Chthamalus population spread into that area. The spread of Chtamalus when Balanus was removed indicates that competitive exclusion makes the realized niche of Chthamalus much smaller than its fundamental niche. RESULTS CONCLUSION Ocean Ecologist Joseph Connell studied two baranacle species  Balanus balanoides and Chthamalus stellatus  that have a stratified distribution on rocks along the coast of Scotland. EXPERIMENT In nature, Balanus fails to survive high on the rocks because it is unable to resist desiccation (drying out) during low tides. Its realized niche is therefore similar to its fundamental niche. In contrast, Chthamalus is usually concentrated on the upper strata of rocks. To determine the fundamental of niche of Chthamalus, Connell removed Balanus form the lower strata. Low tide High tide Chthamalus fundamental niche Chthamalus realized niche Low tide High tide Chthamalus Balanus realized niche Balanus Ocean Figure 53.2 Can a species’ niche be influenced by interspecific competition?

3. Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings Figure 53.4 Character displacement: indirect evidence of past competition G. fortis Beak depth (mm) G. fuliginosa Beak depth Los Hermanos Daphne Santa María, San Cristóbal Sympatric populations G. fuliginosa, allopatric G. fortis, allopatric Percentages of individuals in each size class 40 20 0 40 20 0 40 20 0 810121416

4. Figure 53.5 Cryptic coloration: canyon tree frog

5. Figure 53.6 Aposematic coloration: poison arrow frog

6. Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings Figure 53.7 Batesian mimicry: A harmless species mimics a harmful one (a) Hawkmoth larva (b) Green parrot snake

7. Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings Figure 53.8 Müllerian mimicry: Two unpalatable species mimic each other (a) Cuckoo bee (b) Yellow jacket

8. Figure 53.9 Mutualism between acacia trees and ants

9. Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings Figure 53.10 A possible example of commensalism between cattle egrets and water buffalo

10. Figure 53.12 Examples of terrestrial and marine food chains Quaternary consumers Tertiary consumers Secondary consumers Primary consumers Primary producers Carnivore Herbivore Plant Carnivore Zooplankton Phytoplankton A terrestrial food chainA marine food chain

11. Figure 53.13 An antarctic marine food web Humans Baleen whales Crab-eater seals Birds Fishes Squids Leopard seals Elephant seals Smaller toothed whales Sperm whales Carnivorous plankton Euphausids (krill) Copepods Phyto- plankton

12. Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings Figure 53.18 Beavers as ecosystem “engineers” in temperate and boreal forests

13. Figure 53.27 The equilibrium model of island biogeography Number of species on island (a) Immigration and extinction rates. The equilibrium number of species on an island represents a balance between the immigration of new species and the extinction of species already there. (b) Effect of island size. Large islands may ultimately have a larger equilibrium num- ber of species than small islands because immigration rates tend to be higher and extinction rates lower on large islands. Number of species on island (c) Effect of distance from mainland. Near islands tend to have larger equilibrium numbers of species than far islands because immigration rates to near islands are higher and extinction rates lower. Equilibrium number Rate of immigration or extinction Small island Large islandFar island Near island Immigration Extinction Immigration Extinction Immigration (small island) (large island) (small island) Immigration Extinction Immigration (far island) (near island) (far island) Extinction

14. Table 53.1 Interspecific Interactions