1. Supreme Court Case Review
Rights
Checks and Balances
Equal Treatment under the Law

2. Established the Courts Power of Judicial Review
Marbury v. Madison
McCulloch v. Maryland
State v. Mann
Leandro v. North Carolina

3. The Necessary and Proper Clause was Interpreted to include creation of a National Bank in the case
Marbury v.Madison
McCulloch v. Maryland
State v. Mann
Leandro v. North Carolina

4. The ability to review laws and declare them unconstitutional is called
Veto power
Apportionment
Judicial Review
Impeachment

5. The Elastic Clause is also known as
Judicial Review
Executive Order
Implied Powers Clause
Writ of Habeas Corpus

6. Leandro v. North Carolina Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenberg Schools
The Case in which the NC Supreme Court required schools to provide an “equal basic education”
State v. Mann
Leandro v. North Carolina
Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenberg Schools
Baker v. Carr

7. State Supremacy over local laws was established in the case
State v. Mann
Leandro v. North Carolina
Marbury v. Madison
McCulloch v. Maryland

8. Leandro v. North Carolina
National Supremacy over State Laws was upheld in the case involving the National Bank called
Marbury v. Madison
McCulloch v. Maryland
State v. Mann
Leandro v. North Carolina

9. “Separate but Equal” as a doctrine was declared unconstitutional in the case
Marbury v. Madison
McCulloch v. Maryland
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas
Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenberg Schools

10. Voting Districts should be of equal population according to
Marbury v. Madison
Korematsu v. United States
Reynolds v. Simms
Baker v. Carr

11. Gerrymandering to benefit a racial group is unconstitutional
Baker v. Carr
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, KS
Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States
Reynolds v. Simms

12. The amendment that requires states to ensure equal treatment under the law and due process of the law 10 14 22 17

13. Freedom from a bill of attainder Freedom from double jeopardy
Which right of Japanese American citizens was suspended according to the case Korematsu v. United States
Freedom of speech
Writ of Habeas Corpus
Freedom from a bill of attainder
Freedom from double jeopardy

14. Burning a flag as a form of symbolic speech was protected in
Texas v. Johnson
Tinker v. Des Moines
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
Gitlow v. New York

15. Which case protects a student’s right to symbolic speech?
Texas v. Johnson
Tinker v. Des Moines
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
4. New Jersey v. TLO

16. Student Search Rights were reviewed in the case
Texas v. Johnson
Tinker v. Des Moines
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
New Jersey v. TLO

17. To be considered by the jury To be considered by the judge
According to the decision in Mapp v. Ohio, any evidence seized without a warrant
To be considered by the jury
To be considered by the judge
To be excluded from the court
To be held in an evidence locker for 10 years

18. Mapp v. Ohio New Jersey v. TLO Gideon v. Wainwright Miranda v. Arizona
A person’s right to remain silent was extended by requiring that police explain a person’s right in
Mapp v. Ohio
New Jersey v. TLO
Gideon v. Wainwright
Miranda v. Arizona

19. Mapp v. Ohio New Jersey v. TLO Gideon v. Wainwright Miranda v. Arizona
States must appoint an attorney for those who cannot afford one according to
Mapp v. Ohio
New Jersey v. TLO
Gideon v. Wainwright
Miranda v. Arizona

20. The “separation of church and state” is upheld in the decision
Tinker v. Des Moines
Wisconsin v. Yoder
Wallace v. Jaffree
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier

21. What is Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier about?
Student’s right to free press
Use of prior restraint by a school official
Limited rights of students in order to protect privacy rights and a learning environment
All of the above

22. Freedom of religious expression Freedom from religious establishment
When a local government placed a nativity scene on the courthouse lawn, the Supreme Court said they violated
Freedom of religious expression
Freedom from religious establishment

23. Freedom of Religious Expression Includes
Choosing one’s own faith
Choosing to practice religious rituals that are not harmful to others
Choosing to symbolically express one’s religious faith
All of the above

24. Freedom from Religious Establishment includes
Government may not promote or establish a religion for the people
Government may not establish the religious rituals for people such as prayer time, Bible readings, holiday rituals
Government may not promote symbolically a religion
All of the above

25. According to Lemon V. Kurtzman a government could give $ to a parochial (religious) school if
The $ was not for a religious purpose intentionally
The $ would not promote a religious purpose
Giving the money would not cause an “excessive entanglement” between church and state
All of the above

26. To hire teachers in a religious school
In Everson v. Board of Education, tax dollars spent for this did not violate the establishment clause
To hire teachers in a religious school
To pay for religious texts in a school
To pay for bus fare for students to attend school
To pay for religious symbols in the school

27. Schenck v. United States West Virginia v. Barnette Alleghany v. ACLU
Forcing someone to say the pledge was found to be a violation of a person’s freedom to religious expression in
Abbingdon v. Schempp
Schenck v. United States
West Virginia v. Barnette
Alleghany v. ACLU

28. U.S. v. Nixon U.S. v. New York Times
The President’s use of “Executive Privilege” (to keep a secret) was limited by the Supreme Court Ruling in
U.S. v. Nixon
U.S. v. New York Times

29. US v. Nixon US v. New York Times
The U.S. government’s ability to use prior restraint was limited by the Supreme Court’s ruling in
US v. Nixon
US v. New York Times

30. What is prior restraint?
Ability of a government official to prevent something from being published
Ability of a government to punish someone for publishing information that violated national security (treason)

31. When can the government use prior restraint?
Whenever it wants
When the information to be published would harm national security