2. Item Global 07-08 Global 08-09 Secondary 07-08 Secondary 08-09 Total students who applied 643584201214 Total placements requests 1042685308254 Requests returned “Unable to Place” (UTP) by corporation 284 (27.3%)129(18.8%)102 (33%)45 (17.7%) Students delayed for academic reasons 28 (4.4%)6 (<1%)9 (4.5%)2(<1%) Students delayed for personal reasons 16 (2.5%)13 (2.2%)5 (2.5%)2 (<1%) Students started 610572187148 Placements cancelled due to performance Issues 10 (1.6%)11 (1.9%)4 (2.1%)8 (5%) Total students completing student teaching in 2007-08, 2008-09 603 (98.9%)542 (94.7%)183(97.9%)140 (94.5%)

3. Placement Process  The Student Teaching Office was successful in making 82% of secondary placements on the first try  Students in secondary programs are most likely to cancel their placement for academic or personal reasons, including:  English  Social Studies

4. Additional Cancellation Detail Of the total cancellations, the following additional outcomes have been recorded:  2 students completed a “2 nd chance” placement in 08-09  3 students were moved to 09-10 for student teaching  3 students dropped their program in education

5. Program Item (Global) SecondaryMathematicsScience Social Studies English World Languages Health Placement Requests (685) 172191863411219 UTP Requests (129 – 18.8%) 45 (26%)5 (26%)016 (25%)14 (34%)8 (66%)2 (11%) Total Students (572) 148161548401217 Academic Cancellation (5) 2001100 Personal Cancellation (13) 2002000 Performance Cancellation (11) 4111100 Total Cancellation (30 – 5.2%) 8 (5%) 1 (6%) 4 (8%) 2 (5%) 0 (0%) Total Completion (542) 140151444381217 Application – Completion Success Rate (96%) 95%94%93%92%95%100%

6. Issue Global/Total Secondary Mathematics Science Social Studies English World Languages Health General Ed. GPA 10000000 General Ed. Incomplete 00000000 Content Area GPA 11001000 Content Area Incomplete 42001100 Cumulative GPA 00000000 Professional Ed. Courses (C rule) 00000000 Professional Ed. Incomplete 30000000 Area of Concentration GPA 00000000 Area of Concentration Incomplete 00000000 Total 93002100

7.  Culminating Surveys are completed at the end of each placement by the student and supervising teacher.  Items on the survey include:  Items specific to the student’s preparation  Items specific to their supervision  Items specific to the student teaching process

8. Question Student teacher Supervising teacher Prepared to assume teaching responsibilities4.4 Prepared to assess student learning and growth4.3 Prepared to integrate state academic standards into lesson plans 3.94.2 Prepared to individualize instruction to reach all children 4.24.1

9.  Top areas identified as strengths by student teachers: 1. lesson planning 2. subject area/content 3. state academic standards.

10.  Top areas identified as strengths by supervising teachers: 1. subject area/content 2. lesson planning 3. understands teacher responsibilities.

11.  The same three primary areas were identified as weaknesses by both supervising teachers and student teachers: 1. classroom management 2. individualized instruction 3. assessment skills

12. 1.I was prepared to assume teaching responsibilities. 2.I was prepared to assess student learning and growth. 3.I was prepared to integrate state academic standards into lesson plans. 4.I was prepared to integrate state standards into assessments. 5.I was prepared to individualize instruction to reach all children. 6.I was prepared to manage my classroom. 7.I was prepared for the student teaching experience in my subject/content area.

13. Q1Q2Q3Q4Q5Q6Q7 English/Language Arts (n=35) 4.314.114.374.233.653.994.25 Mathematics (n=11) 4.17 3.95 3.533.614.34 Social Studies (n=52) 4.364.234.524.113.983.704.28 World Languages (n=18) 4.754.734.49 4.304.494.75 Health (n=14) 4.524.364.584.524.044.134.32 Science (n=11) 3.563.954.174.113.613.504.47 Secondary (n=130) 4.334.174.354.133.853.824.33

14. 1.The student teacher was prepared to assume teaching responsibilities. 2.The student teacher was prepared to assess student learning and growth. 3.The student teacher was prepared to integrate state academic standards into lesson plans and assessments. 4.The student teacher individualized instruction to reach all children. 5.The students made significant progress in their learning during the student teacher’s full time teaching phase.

15. Q1Q2Q3Q4Q5 Global n=321 4.424.284.194.034.29 Secondary n=139 4.334.2 4.154.12 Mathematics n=8 4.173.843.753.53.59 Science n=8 4.794.724.864.724.65 Social Studies n=48 4.033.943.923.773.69 English n=31 4.383.884.314.154.09 World Languages n=18 4.754.54.334.274.38 Health n=9 4.19 4.324.824.68

16. Indiana University student teachers at evaluated by the University Supervisors at the midterm and end of their student teaching experience. The University Supervisors use a rubric designed around the six guiding principles:  Knowledge  Learning Environment  Personalized Learning  Community  Reflection  Growth The following tables show the midterm evaluation, the final evaluation, and the change for each of the guiding principles.

17. ItemPrinciple- KnowledgeMidtermFinalChange K1Demonstrates knowledge of student learning and development2.833.490.66 K2 Demonstrates knowledge of content, state standards and resources 2.843.480.64 K3 Demonstrates an understanding of a variety of assessment strategies 2.693.340.65 K4Demonstrates the ability to develop comprehensive lesson plans2.893.560.67 ItemPrinciple- Learning EnvironmentMidtermFinalChange E1Plans and demonstrates classroom management2.673.350.68 E2Develops a positive physical environment2.973.570.60 E3Develops a positive social environment3.023.610.59 E4Develops a positive academic environment3.003.610.61 E5 Provides positive transitions in classroom and learning communities 2.793.470.68

18. ItemPrinciple- Personalized LearningMidtermFinalChange P1Develops lessons that reflect individual student ability levels2.733.340.61 P2Develops lessons that are creative, engaging and are appropriate2.993.610.62 P3 Develops instructional activities that address multiple learning styles 2.803.440.64 P4Builds productive learning relationships with students3.133.710.58 ItemPrinciple- CommunityMidtermFinalChange C1Acquires an understanding of the community and students’ lives2.903.480.58 C2Communicates with parents effectively3.163.660.50 C3Becomes a productive member within the school2.613.380.77

19. ItemPrinciple- ReflectionMidtermFinalChange R1Reflects upon oneself in writing3.143.680.54 R2Uses reflection to improve instruction3.173.710.54 R3Identifies ways to improve as a professional3.083.670.59 ItemPrinciple- GrowthMidtermFinalChange G1Acts professionally and appropriately3.483.820.34 G2 Accepts constructive criticism and suggestions and incorporates them 3.443.810.37 G3Accepts all professional responsibilities3.353.740.39 G4Demonstrates an understanding of current issues2.813.380.57 G5Refines continuously an individual philosophy of teaching3.123.660.54

20. 1.Performance data reflect positive change and growth. 2.Students historically have difficulties with classroom management. 3.Students who had a second chance at student teaching succeeded. Better prepared More mature Different environment