Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 1 GG/Sales Support/ March 2013 ERJ 190 Sukhoi SSJ100 Embraer ERJ 190 Airbus A319 Operational and Economic Comparison A319 SSJ100.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1 1 GG/Sales Support/ March 2013 ERJ 190 Sukhoi SSJ100 Embraer ERJ 190 Airbus A319 Operational and Economic Comparison A319 SSJ100."— Presentation transcript:

1 1 1 GG/Sales Support/ March 2013 ERJ 190 Sukhoi SSJ100 Embraer ERJ 190 Airbus A319 Operational and Economic Comparison A319 SSJ100

2 2 2 Introduction This study compares the SUKHOI Regional Jet Aircraft SSJ100-95 with some other aircraft:  The EMBRAER ERJ 190 (98-seat standard configuration) its direct competitor;  The AIRBUS A319 (134-seat all-economy configuration) not considered a direct competitor, being different in weight and capacity, from operational and cost points of view. This comparison applies to general and details design, weights and performance. The Cabin layouts considered for comparison are the basic one in all-economy configuration, offering the same comfort:  98 seats at 32” pitch for SSJ100-95  98 seats at 32” pitch for ERJ 190  134 seats at 32” pitch for A319

3 3 3 Comparable Configurations Manufacturer’s source Basic Versions E. C. January 2012 US $ mill. SSJ100/95 98 seats / 32” pitch 35.40 (5-abreast) ERJ 190 98 seats / 32” pitch42.80 (4-abreast) A319 134 seats / 32” pitch80.70 (6-abreast) Sukhoi (Russia) Embraer (Brazil) Airbus (EU) List Price

4 4 4 Aircraft Characteristics Weights and Power Plant

5 5 5 Aircraft Characteristics Dimensions

6 6 6 Cabin configurations Standard Single Class 98 seats at 32” pitch 5-abreast A319 Single Class all-economy 134 seats at 32” pitch 6-abreast SSJ100 ERJ 190 Standard Single Class 98 seats at 32” pitch 4-abreast

7 7 7 Cabin Cross Sections Comparison Largest cabin in its Market Segment… and comparable with existing Narrow Body Aircraft SSJ100 ERJ 190

8 8 8 Cabin Cross Sections Comparison Largest cabin in its Market Segment… and comparable with existing Narrow Body Aircraft SSJ100 A319

9 9 9 Operational Assumptions Operating Techniques: ISA Conditions, still air Taxi Time Allowances:14 minutes Engine start and taxi-out 9 min Taxi-in 5 min Fuel for taxi-in is taken out of reserves. Long Range Cruise (LRC) speed at best altitude Fuel Reserve Allowances: Fuel to 100 NM alternate at long range cruise Contingency Fuel: 5% of trip fuel Holding Fuel: fuel for 30 minutes holding at 1 500 ft above alternate airport elevation Passenger plus Baggage Weight: 100 kg (220 lb)

10 10 10 Aircraft Performance Block Time & Block Fuel

11 11 11 Economic Assumptions Economic Analysis

12 12 12 Economic Assumptions Annual Utilisation per aircraft2 800 Block hours Depreciation15 years with 10% of residual value Insurance1% of aircraft price per year Fuel1 086.5 USD / tonne (IATA source – March 2013) Maintenance According to aircraft jets experience Landing Charges6.40 USD / tonneBasis: MTOW Air Navigation ChargesEUROCONTROL FormulaUnit rate: 65.00 EUR Cockpit Crew Cost235 USD / Block Hour (1 Crew = Captain + First Officer) Flight Attendant Cost 40 USD / Block Hour Number of Cabin Attendants per A/C2 attendants from 51 to 100 seats 3 attendants from 101 to 150 seats

13 13 13 Indirect Operating Costs (IOC)50% of Cash Operating Costs (COC) Airfare ticket200 US $ per paxfor 500 NM (Full Fare – Economy Class) 320 US $ per paxfor 1 000 NM Ticket Commission8% of ticket fare Exchange Rate1 Euro = 1.3034 US $ (E. C. March 2013)  Cash Operating Cost: Fuel + Crew + Maintenance + Landing / Handling / Navigation Charges  Direct Operating Cost: Cash Operating cost + Depreciation + Insurance  Total Operating Cost: Direct Operating Cost + Indirect Operating Cost Economic Assumptions

14 14 14 Economic Analysis 500 nm Sector

15 15 15 Operating Cost Comparison: 500 nm Sector

16 16 16 Cash Operating Cost Comparison: 500 nm Sector C.O.C. per Seat Comparison On a cost per seat basis, the SSJ100 has a 5.5% advantage over the ERJ 190 and about 13% disadvantage over the A319, largest in size and weight compared to SSJ100.

17 17 17 Direct Operating Cost Comparison: 500 nm Sector D.O.C. per Seat Comparison SSJ100: lowest D.O.C. per available seat

18 18 18 Total Operating Cost Comparison: 500 nm Sector T.O.C. per Seat Comparison SSJ100: lowest T.O.C. per available seat respect to ERJ 190 and equivalent to A319

19 19 19 Profitability Comparison Break-Even Load Factors Comparison 500 NM Sector Distance SUPERJET100 means profitability. Thanks to its low operating costs, it provides significant cost advantages over its direct competitors. 50 pax 46 pax 68 pax

20 20 20 Economic Analysis 1 000 nm Sector

21 21 21 Operating Cost Comparison: 1 000 nm Sector

22 22 22 Cash Operating Cost Comparison: 1 000 nm Sector C.O.C. per Seat Comparison On a cost per seat basis, the SSJ100 has a 6.2% advantage over the ERJ 190 and about 7% disadvantage over the A319, largest in size and weight compared to SSJ100.

23 23 23 Direct Operating Cost Comparison: 1 000 nm Sector D.O.C. per Seat Comparison SSJ100: lowest D.O.C. per available seat

24 24 24 Total Operating Cost Comparison: 1 000 nm Sector T.O.C. per Seat Comparison SSJ100: lowest T.O.C. per available seat

25 25 25 Profitability Comparison Break-Even Load Factors Comparison 1 000 NM Sector Distance SUPERJET100 means profitability. Thanks to its low operating costs, it provides significant cost advantages over its direct competitors. 46 pax 41 pax 59 pax


Download ppt "1 1 GG/Sales Support/ March 2013 ERJ 190 Sukhoi SSJ100 Embraer ERJ 190 Airbus A319 Operational and Economic Comparison A319 SSJ100."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google