1. May 25, 20121 IAB: Trends in CSE CSE Fall Enrollments CSE Degrees Awarded Assessment ABET accreditation Annual SACS Assessment Reports Graduate Program Review ??

2. 2 CSE Fall Enrollments May 25, 2012

3. CSE Degrees Awarded Acad Yr IA Cert BSCSBS CIS BS Engr MSMEMSoft Engr PhD 02-03 03924 216000 03-04 0263425124022 04-05 028152583832 05-06 333172421805 06-07 32318 223111 07-08 21541092109 08-091201312417-7 09-1001971548-5 10-11124121321625 May 25, 20123

4. CSE Undergraduate Degrees 4May 25, 2012

5. CSE Master’s Level Degrees 5May 25, 2012

6. Continuous Assessment, Evaluation, and Improvement Comp. Sc. & Engr. Mission Program OutcomesEducational Objectives Measurable Performance Criteria Assessment Collect & Process Assessment DataEvaluation Provide Feedback for Improvement Curriculum Constituents Provide Feedback

7. Assessment of Ugrad Programs ABET visit Engineering Accreditation Commission, Computing Accreditation Commission CS, CompEngr – concern on lab support CIS – weakness – Info Systems leadership SACS – annual assessment reports 7 of them; 3 ugrad, 4 grad April 26, 20117

8. Doctor of Philosophy in Computer Science and Engineering Research degree Coursework 48 hours post Bachelors Core CSCE 513 – Computer Architecture CSCE 531 – Compilers CSCE 551 – Theory of Computation CSCE 750 Analysis of Algorithms CSCE 791 Seminar in Computer Science Qualifying Exam Comprehensive Defense of Dissertation

9. PhD Educational Objectives Three to five years after graduation Computer Science and Engineering doctoral graduates should be: Contributing to their communities and society with innovations in computer research and an understanding of contemporary technological issues. Advancing in their careers through their research in computer science and engineering, by communicating and working effectively as team members and by interacting responsibly with others in society. Continuing their professional development through ongoing research. May 25, 2012

10. Student Outcomes for the PhD At the time of graduation a Doctor of Philosophy student should be able to: Perform research involving computer systems for the solution of problems. Formulate problems in their research area that are challenging and of wide interest in the area. Communicate effectively about their research in computer science and engineering. Actively contribute to the research in their area. Achieve the highest level of expertise in their chosen area of research. May 25, 2012

11. Learning Outcome 4. At the time of graduation a Doctor of Philosophy student should be able to actively contribute to the research in their area. Criteria Methods Results Use of Results May 25, 201211

12. Criteria At the time of graduation the number of publications accepted, under review in journals and conferences should satisfy: accepted >=1, accepted + under review >=3. The percentage of students satisfying this should be greater than 80%. In the Exit interview, …(continued next slide) May 25, 201212

13. . In the Exit interview, which is conducted after the dissertation is submitted, the percentage of students that rate their ability to actively contribute research as excellent or very good should be greater than 80%. The department will also measure the time for a full-time student to progress to the milestones: qualifying exam, comprehensive exam and defense of dissertation. May 25, 201213

14. Methods: After the defense The Graduate Secretary will compile a list of publications and verify this list with the graduate. The Graduate Secretary will enter the data into a spreadsheet and provide it to the Graduate Director and the other members of the Graduate committee. May 25, 2012 14May 25, 2012

15. Methods The Graduate Committee will discuss the level of achievement of the the graduates and any necessary actions. The Graduate Director will record the discussion and write the assessment report. May 25, 201215

16. Methods: After Submission After the dissertation has been submitted to the Graduate School The Graduate Director will perform the exit interview of the graduates to indirectly assess the achievement of this outcome. The Graduate Committee will discuss the level of achievement of the graduates and any necessary actions. May 25, 201216

17. Methods: After Submission The Graduate Director will record the discussion and write the assessment report. From the Alumni database the time to milestones for full-time students will be presented. May 25, 201217

18. Results 2010-20112009-20102008-20092007-2008 Graduates 2759 Papers 15332172 Journal Papers 4--- Average 7.54.74.28 Median 7.5249 Journal Papers 4NA May 25, 201218 Use of Results – Outcome goal is met; no action.

19. Graduate Student Day Jarrell Waggoner Computer Science and Engineering PhD Graph Cut Approaches for Materials Segmentation Preserving Shape, Appearance, and Topology - Physical Sciences 1st Place Graph Cut Approaches for Materials Segmentation Preserving Shape, Appearance, and Topology Laura Boccanfuso Computer Science and Engineering PhD Remote Stress Detection with a High Precision Infrared Sensor Health & Life Sciences 2nd PlaceRemote Stress Detection with a High Precision Infrared Sensor Ishtiaq Rouf Computer Science and Engineering MS Neighborhood Watch: Security and Privacy Analysis of Automatic Meter Reading Systems Poster 11 - Physical Sciences 2nd Place Neighborhood Watch: Security and Privacy Analysis of Automatic Meter Reading Systems Chuan Qin – TagSense – auto. tagging of phone photos 19 May 25, 2012

20. PhD Placement Most recent Research Labs (80-90%) Microsoft, Amazon, Siemens … Academia: Lander, Clafflin (teaching award), Clarkson, Wake Forest, Memphis(chair)  Dean at IUPUI?, Georgia, Arizona St., … USC 20May 25, 2012