Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Educational Research: Post-analysis Considerations, Preparing and Evaluating a Research Report EDU 8603 Educational Research Richard M. Jacobs, OSA, Ph.D.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Educational Research: Post-analysis Considerations, Preparing and Evaluating a Research Report EDU 8603 Educational Research Richard M. Jacobs, OSA, Ph.D."— Presentation transcript:

1 Educational Research: Post-analysis Considerations, Preparing and Evaluating a Research Report EDU 8603 Educational Research Richard M. Jacobs, OSA, Ph.D.

2 Completing a research study is not the terminus of the research process… …data must be verified and stored …results must be interpreted …the research report must be written

3 In particular, computer analyses must be checked very carefully… …inputting mistakes lead to erroneous results

4 Verifying the data... The data must be double-checked, coding procedures verified, accuracy of computations examined, and the reasonableness of the findings evaluated …the research needs to find errors before reviewers, editors, and readers of scholarly journals do

5 Storing the data... After verifying the accuracy of the data, the researcher must label, organize and file the data in a safe place …the original data may be subsequently needed by the researcher or other researchers who may wish to examine the data utilizing different statistical techniques

6 Interpreting research results... The results of statistical analyses need to be interpreted in terms of… …the purpose of the study …the original research hypothesis …and with respect to other studies that have been conducted in the same area of research

7 hypothesized results... hypothesized results... …the researcher must describe adequately what statistics indicate about null hypothesis statistical significance …the issue concerns statistical significance and why the researcher accepts/rejects the null hypothesis

8 unhypothesized results... unhypothesized results... …during the research process an apparent relationship may emerge that was not previously hypothesized …collect and analyze data on these unforeseen relationships; present the results, but do not change or add to the original hypothesis

9 …instead, use the unhypothesized results as the basis for a later study designed specifically to test the new hypothesis

10 statistical issues... statistical issues... …valid inferences require that the sample be representative of the population …valid inferences also require that the conditions (or assumptions) underlying the statistical procedure are met

11 …otherwise, bias enters into the statistics used and the research findings and, hence, the generalizations from them are weakened if not rendered meaningless

12 methodological issues... methodological issues... …ignoring measurement error …ignoring low statistical power …performing multiple comparisons

13 measurement error... measurement error... …measurements are seldom error-free …large amounts of measurement error hamper the ability to find statistically significant research results

14 statistical power... statistical power... …the probability that a Type II error is avoided …however, lowering statistical power increases the likelihood that the researcher will overlook or miss the outcome desired

15 statistical power depends upon four interrelated factors… …the significance level selected …the direction of the significance test …the sample size …the effect size (i.e., the degree of the departure from the null hypothesis)

16 strategies for estimating the effect size…. …select a cut-off score below which an effect size is judge unimportant …choose conventional, generally agreed upon definitions of small, medium, and large effect sizes …use the effect sizes of studies of the same phenomenon

17 to increase power…. …(a priori) increase the significance level …(a priori) increase the sample size

18 the strongest support for a research hypothesis comes from replication… …as the study is repeated with different participants in the same or different settings …which increases the generalizability of the findings

19 The matter of “significance”... statistical significance practical significance The fact of statistical significance does not automatically mean that a study’s results have any practical significance

20 statistical significance... statistical significance... …the results of the study are likely to occur by chance a certain percentage of the time …the observed statistical relationship or differences is probably a real difference, but not necessarily an important one

21 practical significance... practical significance... …the results of the study are able to applied or used by practitioners or clinicians in their particular setting

22 Preparing a research report... After verifying, storing, and interpreting the data, the researcher begins the process of writing the final report… …which requires outlining and providing details for the general sections

23 Elements of a research report… 1. preliminary pages 2. main body 3. appendices

24 1) preliminary pages… …table of contents …list of tables and figures …abstract …title page …acknowledgements page

25 title page... title page... …indicates the title of the report, the author’s name, the requirement being fulfilled, the name and location of the institution, the date of submission of the report …states the purpose of the study as succinctly as possible

26 acknowledgements page... acknowledgements page... …expresses an author’s appreciation to persons who have contributed significantly to the completion of the report

27 table of contents... table of contents... …provides an outline indicating on which page each major section (or chapter) and subsection begins

28 list of tables and figures... list of tables and figures... …gives the number and title of each table and figure and the page on which it can be found

29 abstract... abstract... …a statement summarizing the basic purposes of the study, including: the problem investigated, types of participants and instruments, the design, the procedures, the major results, as well as the major conclusions

30 2) main body… …results …discussion …references …introduction …method

31 introduction... introduction... …a well-written description of the problem, a review of related literature, and a definition of terms …should lead logically to the statement of the hypothesis

32 method... method... …a description of the participants, instruments, design, procedures, assumptions, and limitations

33 results... results... …describes the statistical techniques or qualitative interpretations that were applied to the data and the results of the analysis …information about the process applied during data analysis should be provided

34 discussion... discussion... …identifies the agreement or disagreement of the findings with previous results obtained by other researchers in other studies or the hypotheses stated at the start of the study … identifies the theoretical and practical implications of the findings and makes recommendations for future research or future action

35 references... references... …a listing of all sources, alphabetically by authors’ last names, directly used in writing the report

36 3) appendices… …information and data that are pertinent to the study that either are not important enough to be included in the main body of the report or are too lengthy

37 Some general rules for writing…...format according to APA Publication Manual (5 th edition) …use clear, simple, straight-forward style, including correct spelling, grammar, and punctuation …learn from the corrections provided on your 8603 exercises

38 Evaluating research reports… requires the development of a set of skills that enable an individual to differentiate the quality and value of research reports… …by accurately identifying their strengths and weaknesses

39 General evaluative criteria… 1. introduction 2. method 3. results 4. discussion 5. abstract or summary

40 1) introduction… …hypotheses …problem …review of literature

41 2) method… …design and procedure …participants …instruments

42 3) results… 4) discussion (including conclusions and recommendations)… 5) abstract or summary…

43 Type-specific evaluative criteria… 1. qualitative research 2. descriptive research (including questionnaire, interview, and observation studies) 3. correlational research (including relationship and prediction studies) 4. causal-comparative research 5. experimental research

44 Mini-Quiz… True and false… …the larger the denominator in a parametric test of significance, the larger the numerator must be to attain significance True

45 True and false… …computer analyses of data always provide accurate results of the data input into the program True

46 True and false… …the product of a test of significance is a number True

47 True and false… …what the test of significant means requires interpretation True

48 True and false… …virtually any difference can be made significant if the sample is large enough True

49 True and false… …the higher the level of significance at which the null hypothesis will be rejected, the more powerful the test True

50 True and false… …the failure to reject the null hypothesis renders a study insignificant False

51 True and false… …a true test of a hypothesis comes from its ability to explain and predict what is happening False

52 True and false… …the lack of randomized samples can introduce bias into a study and limit its usefulness True

53 True and false… …although the researcher is likely to know the significance level of the study and its sample size, the researcher is not likely to know the effect size True

54 True and false… …smaller sample sizes mean less power True

55 True and false… …statistical and practical significance are synonymous False

56 True and false… …a greater mean difference is probably required to reject a null hypothesis True

57 True and false… …repeating a study with different participants in the same or different settings increases the generalizability of the findings True

58 True and false… …the most common flaw in a research study is the lack of information provided about validity and reliability True

59 True and false… …whether the most appropriate design was used in a study, given the problem, involves a degree of subjective judgment True

60 Fill in the blank… …the process of double-checking, cleaning, and organization of the data as well as evaluating the research conclusion verification

61 Fill in the blank… …the probability of avoiding a Type II error power

62 Fill in the blank… …the results of a study are likely to occur by chance a certain percentage of the time statistical significance

63 Fill in the blank… …the strongest research evidence supporting a research hypothesis replication

64 This module has focused on... post-analysis considerations, preparing and evaluating research reports...the procedures for checking and storing all data in an organized manner and the general guidelines for reporting a study’s findings


Download ppt "Educational Research: Post-analysis Considerations, Preparing and Evaluating a Research Report EDU 8603 Educational Research Richard M. Jacobs, OSA, Ph.D."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google