1. Low-Fi Prototypes Group 13 António Pereira (63287) Ana Almeida (64719) Hugo Gonçalves (66998) Lab7 Presentation

2. Low-Fi Prototypes  Prototypes Evaluation  Results obtained  Low Fidelity Prototypes Development

3. Low-Fi Prototypes Low Fidelity Prototypes Development  we developed two alternatives of our LFPs  the alternatives were similar in functionality but with a few different issues  as so, a few differences in aspect were also made  we focused on different functionality alternatives so we could explore more features for the application  also, we had some doubts about some of our requirements

4. Low-Fi Prototypes Low Fidelity Prototypes Development

5. Low-Fi Prototypes Low Fidelity Prototypes Development

6. Low-Fi Prototypes Prototypes Evaluation  we made about 10 sessions of prototypes evaluation  each person was only given one type of our possible two prototypes  this was made because if they were given the two alternatives, we wouldn’t get accurate results for the second one  also, we asked the users to talk to us, as they were perform the tasks

7. Low-Fi Prototypes Prototypes Evaluation  we asked the users to perform three taks:  visualize all the photos from the Summer 2012  upload photos from your facebook account to the PhoO application  search the beach photos of Richard

8. Low-Fi Prototypes Prototypes Evaluation  having those tasks, we decided to perform our evaluation into some tests:  was the task completed?  some approach of the duration of the task  because this aren’t functional prototypes  was the task difficult? (from 1 to 5)  was it satisfying to perform? (from 1 to 5)  after the tests, we asked the users to give their opinion whether on what they thought is wrong and also other random opinions they might have

9. Low-Fi Prototypes Results Obtained  based on the tests observation and on the answers users gave us, we identified some problems about our LFPs  some solutions were already made in the other alternative, but some others had to be added from scratch

10. Low-Fi Prototypes Results Obtained  by not having a search icon in the menu, people couldn’t find photos  search icon in the initial menu was added

11. Low-Fi Prototypes Results Obtained  if name is a tag, many photos can have the same name  description is too much unnecessary information  the screen is too confusing  name and description were removed  the screen is now less confusing  a tooltip was added to help the users

12. Low-Fi Prototypes Results Obtained  search options don’t allow searching by multiple tags  search by multiple tags allowed

13. Low-Fi Prototypes Results Obtained

14. Questions?