1. LARP Accelerator Systems : “home work” Vladimir Shiltsev bnl - fnal- lbnl - slac US LHC Accelerator Research Program

2. LARP DOE Review 06/12/2006 - Shiltsev 2 #1 Show how you are going to spend the Accelerator Systems budget for the remainder of the fiscal year. Show specific actions. [Shiltsev] #5 What are the plans for energizing commissioners and the training of young physicists? Note that the committee felt that Mike Syphers was running late with respect to recruiting. Need to get people in there early. Match up with mentors. [Peggs, Shiltsev] “Home work” AS Questions

3. LARP DOE Review 06/12/2006 - Shiltsev 3 FY06 Accelerator Systems Budget Accelerator Systems’06 Funding allocation: 3,684k$Accelerator Systems’06 Funding allocation: 3,684k$ Expenses thru 05/31:1,937k$Expenses thru 05/31:1,937k$ Balance:1,739k$Balance:1,739k$

4. LARP DOE Review 06/12/2006 - Shiltsev 4 Instrumentation: Total 662k$ (M&S 190k$, SWF 425k$, Travel 47k$)Instrumentation: Total 662k$ (M&S 190k$, SWF 425k$, Travel 47k$) Funding balance as of May 31, 2006:650k$ total –LUMI: Labor 81k$/mos x4=325k$; M&S 125k$ (first module); Travel 25k$; Sub-Total 475k$ –TCFB: Labor 14k$/mos x4=56k$; M&S 25k$ (SPS test); Travel 15k$ ; Sub-Total =96k$ Peter may somewhat overspend his budget at BNL –Schottky: Labor 11k$/mos x4=44k$; M&S 40k$; Travel 7k$; Sub-Total 91k$ Commissioning: Total 336-386k$ (M&S 27k$, SWF 167-197k$, Travel 142-162k$) Funding balance as of May 31, 2006:523k$ total –BC: Travel 100-120k$ (2x3mos SPS, 2 short), M&S 27k$ (CERN accnt, VC); Sub-Total 127-147k$ –IR and HC: Labor 167-197k$ (total of 5-7man*mos), Travel 42k$; Sub-total 209-239k$ LBNL as a plan for spending their remaining money. Joseph Rasson, Jon Zbasnik and FredericGicquel will be spending 3.5 man months at CERN working on DFBX commissioning FNAL money will be used for commissioning efforts. All of the 5 commissioners slated for next year will spend 1-2 weeks at CERN working in groups so that they will "hit the ground running" There will be an additional 1 month of effort at Fermilab with M.Lamm for oversight, extra 10k$ % at FNAL Collimation: Total 386-406k$ (M&S 196k$, SWF 160-180k$, Travel 30k$)Collimation: Total 386-406k$ (M&S 196k$, SWF 160-180k$, Travel 30k$) Funding balance as of May 31, 2006:296k$ total –RadMaps and TCT: Labor 20-40k$ (depending on BNL postdoc) –Irradiation: M&S 16k$ (BLIP studies) Nick Simos ould love to get more (>% of his Labor, part of post doc if found) –RC : Labor 140k$ (ME, PD); M&S 180k$ (Braze, VacParts, Room, Cntrl); Travel 30k$; Sub-Total 350k$ Salaries: Steve Lundgren: $70k Tom&Eric $30k Designer $40k Total $140k Shop: Electricians $7k Brazing $58k Total $65k M&S DAQ+Software $10k Clean room equipment $50k Vacuum parts $20k Test fixture parts $20k Brazing parts $15k Travel $30k Total $145k Excess (if spent) comes out of FY'05->FY06 carryover 172k$ Accelerator Physics: Total 284-304k$ (M&S 100-120k$, SWF 184k$)Accelerator Physics: Total 284-304k$ (M&S 100-120k$, SWF 184k$) Funding balance as of May 31, 2006:271 $ total –E-cloud and IR design and Beam-Beam simulations : Labor 46k$/mos x4=184k$ Current rate is about 46k$/mos –Wires: finish construction M&S 100-120k$; Labor at FNAL 0k$ (done) M&S uncertainty due to Brookhaven shops which give notoriously unreliable estimates FY06 Accelerator Systems Budget

5. LARP DOE Review 06/12/2006 - Shiltsev 5 Total: 1668-1758k$Total: 1668-1758k$ –M&S 513-533k$ –Labor 936-986k$ –Travel 219-239k$ Funding balance 05’06:1739k$ Remaining Accel Syst Spendings

6. LARP DOE Review 06/12/2006 - Shiltsev 6 Current priorities:Current priorities: –“get in” the LHC commissioning system, understand the rople(s) LARP can play, establish working relations –Organize IR and hardware commissioning –Participate in the SPS run (summer ’06), sector test (early 2007) –Have sizeable presence (3-4 people at any given moment) in several months before and several months after the 1 st beam and 1 st collisions and several months after the 1 st beam and 1 st collisions - Establish regular flow of US LARP people #5: Energize Commissioning

7. LARP DOE Review 06/12/2006 - Shiltsev 7 Scale of the problem:Scale of the problem: –Assume 1,500k$/yr budget –Solution #1: 7FTEsx200k$ +0.1k$ to manage them –Solution #2: 20 3-mos visits/yr x50k$ + 250k$ extra travel expenses and + 250k$ extra travel expenses and + 250k$ to manage them + 250k$ to manage them For the next 4 years: –28 long-termers (>1yr) or –80 short-term visits (3 mos) #5: Energize Commissioning

8. LARP DOE Review 06/12/2006 - Shiltsev 8 As of now we do have:As of now we do have: –Some 25 names, mostly “short-termers”, of those willing to go Ways to go: –Account Instrumentation people willing to take part in beam commissioning and post-commissioning 5-7 people, needs communication btw L2s –Attract people from Universities: As of now we can think of 2-3 Professors (short termers) and 2-5 students (long- termers) Can be part of lab-centered programs, like FNAL Accel PhD program – More Toohig Fellows: Anticipate ~4 more in the next 3 years - all long termers Pressure on Fellowship Committee to advertise and select – Get more people from Labs… how?: SLAC after PEP-II close-up: 2-3 seniors+2-4 juniors; need OK from the top LBL and BNL: active campaign to attract short-termers (~10-15 total) which may end up in getting ~4-6 youngsters to reside at CERN (hard to count on FNAL – it gives what it can) –Repetitive visits, at least for short termers (x2  40 needed) #5: Energize Commissioning

9. LARP DOE Review 06/12/2006 - Shiltsev 9 Current plan:Current plan: –Explore previously unexplored possibilities over next ~ 6 mos –Have a review of AS Commissioning plans be the end of 2006 –Plan of actions depending on the outcome (rescale participation plans, new ideas, etc) #5: Energize Commissioning

10. LARP DOE Review 06/12/2006 - Shiltsev 10 Accel.Syst. Spendings - Overall 1.94M/3.6M=53% thru 05/31/06:

11. LARP DOE Review 06/12/2006 - Shiltsev 11 Accel.Syst. Spendings - II 348/879=40% thru 05/31/06: 204/500=41% thru 05/31/06: 399/670=60% thru 05/31/06: 985M/1635=60% thru 05/31/06: