1. Cataloging Internet Resources OLAC/MOUG Conference October 13, 2000 Linda Barnhart University of California, San Diego lbarnhart@ucsd.edu

2. Objectives: To provide basic information from AACR2, MARC21 and other tools To provide a variety of interesting real-life examples To give you helpful tips and hints from experienced catalogers To provide links for further information To make you interested and excited about doing this, so you’ll add more bibliographic records!

3. Scope: We will cover Internet resources: –Websites –Related websites –Electronic books –Electronic journals –Databases

4. Scope: We will NOT cover: –Direct access computer files (CD-ROMs, DVDs, or floppy disks) –Interactive multimedia –Metadata schemes other than MARC21 No exercises or tests!

5. Outline/Agenda: Why should we catalog Internet resources? Characteristics of Internet resources Key resources to help you in cataloging How to look at an Internet resource Choosing a workform Example 1: Web site Example 2: Related Web site Break

6. Outline/Agenda: Example 3: Electronic book Example 4: Electronic journal Example 5: Database

7. Why should we catalog Internet resources? We cannot (and wouldn’t want to) catalog the Internet Online catalogs can (should?) provide access to all formats; web OPACS provide links Much valuable information there; we could catalog selected quality resources Users want instant gratification The paradigm is shifting, and users go to the Internet first. What is the role of the library? Catalogers (and librarians) know how to organize things well; the Internet needs help!

8. Characteristics of Internet resources that concern catalogers There’s no physical item-in-hand (tangibility) They change too much (volatility of location) They change too much (volatility of content) What is the extent of the item? (granularity)

9. Barriers to cataloging Internet resources Perception that it’s all original cataloging Fear of raising expectations and thus creating an invisible backlog Concern about taking the time to learn cataloging skills for a new format Concern about the priority Internet resources should have vis-à-vis other library materials Challenge of cataloging more with judgment and precedent than with finely honed rules

10. You don’t have to do it all! Catalog based on library user needs and priorities Libraries prioritize Internet resources in different ways (all should be quality and content-rich resources): –Format (e.g., electronic journals) –Subject (e.g., specialty areas) –Resources maintained on a local server –Resources that are unique or locally created –Resources maintained by reputable organizations –Limit to a target number, as a pilot project

11. Key resources to help you in cataloging Primary sources: –Nancy Olson’s manual (Second edition) –LC Guidelines for Coding Electronic Resources –CONSER Cataloging Manual Module 31 –LC’s Guidelines for the Use of Field 856 –OCLC-MARC Coding Guidelines –OCLC tutorial: Online Library Learning Series –ISBD (ER) Use UCSD’s TPOT Web site to connect to all these and more!

12. How to look at an Internet resource Look at the content Look at the html Look for a site map What do we have in our OPAC that is related to this? Think about granularity. How far do you want to go in cataloging this?

13. Choosing a workform “Type of Record” coding (fixed field “Type”) changed significantly in June 1997 to code for significant aspect of content rather than physical form Choose the workform for the most significant aspect of the content of the material, e.g.: –Language material (Type: a) –Musical sound material (Type: j) –Cartographic material (Type: e)

14. Type “m” Definition revised and greatly narrowed in June 1997 Use “m” (computer file workform) ONLY for: –Computer software (including programs, games, fonts) –Numeric data –Computer-oriented multimedia –Online systems or services

16. Example 1: Web site Chief source: main page(s) If no main page, then use other formally presented internal evidence (e.g., first display of information, HTML source code, “about” screen, etc.) There is usually no accompanying printed documentation to help Source of title is a required note

17. Terms that have been used in catalog records for the “Title from…” note: Home Page Web Page Title screen Opening Screen Initial Screen Welcome Screen Menu Search Screen Splash Screen Introductory Screen Logon Screen

21. Familiar fields….. Leader/008 (except Form of Item code) 1xx 245 title and statement of responsibility (except for $h) 246 (often more 246s than for print resources!) 250, 260 5xx, 504 650, 7xx

22. LC Subject Headings Treat Internet resources like any other form of material in terms of the number and kind of subject headings used Do not confuse topical headings (or subdivisions) with genre headings (or subdivisions) SCM sections that apply: –H 1095 Free-floating subdivisions –H 1520 Databases –H 1580.5Electronic serials –H 2070Software and Works about software

23. Popular LC subdivisions $vComputer games $xComputer network resources $xComputer programs $x/$vDatabases $vElectronic discussion groups $xElectronic information resources $vInteractive multimedia $vJuvenile software $vSoftware NOTE: No subdivision for Web sites!

24. Other “hooks” Strongly recommend defining a local practice so you can find similar records and packages again! (Local headings may help your users, too) Possibilities: –655 –690 –590 –710 –793 –Other fixed field

25. Classification of Internet Resources Area of much debate and discussion Need to clearly identify Internet resources so users don’t go to the shelf Maybe classification (not full call number assignment) is enough Easier to do when there are print equivalents, but useful for Web sites too

26. Maybe not-so-familiar fields…... 008 Form of item: “s” 006 Additional material characteristics 007 Physical characteristics/description 245 $h [computer file] 256 Computer file characteristics NO 300 field!!! 538 System details note 500 Source of title (required) 856 Electronic location and access

27. 856 field Use “Guidelines for the Use of Field 856” from LC at http://www.loc.gov/marc/856guide.html http://www.loc.gov/marc/856guide.html First indicator: Access method (4=http) Second indicator: Relationship (0=resource) Commonly used subfields: –$u URI –$3 Materials specified –$z Public note

28. URL tips and tricks Encoding non-USMARC characters: –%5F for spacing underscore –%7E for spacing tilde Which URL to choose Some URLs need to be constructed Multiple 856 fields URL maintenance after cataloging

29. Example 2: Related Web site Related Web sites are Internet resources that accompany another primary format Examples include an online Table of Contents for a printed book or online ordering or subscription information that relate to a printed serial Information about the related Web site can be included in the record for the printed material

33. Time for a break!

34. Example 3: Electronic Book Many electronic book records in WorldCat: –netLibrary has over 18,000 separate records –Records for other digitized monographs Issues with single vs. separate records LCRI 1.11A: Reproductions Type: a and Bib lvl: m

38. Electronic Books: Digitized reprints Describe the original, and add information about the reproduction in a 533 006 for electronic; 007 for more specifics of electronic version ISBN for electronic version; ISBN for print in $z Call number for print version remains in record 245 $h computer file

39. Electronic Books: Digitized reprints netLibrary records contain a 655 for the genre Electronic books 710 field gives added entry for netLibrary 776 field links to bib record for print edition 856 links to netLibrary site

40. Electronic books: Consider…. Adding local “hooks” to collocate these items in your online catalog Use the single record concept! Add: –020 for electronic ISBN –007 –530 (Also available on the World Wide Web…) –856

41. Example 4: Electronic journal Type a/bib level s

42. CONSER and Multiple Versions CONSER calls these “Remote access computer file serials” CCM Module 31 is indispensable! “It is preferable to create separate records for the CONSER database. However, CONSER members may choose…to note the existence and electronic location of the online version in the record for the printed serial.”

43. Single vs. separate records What do your users want? Both techniques are permissible Use the separate record technique when there is no print equivalent (issued in electronic format only) Use the single record technique for scanned reproductions where the online content is identical to the print

53. Special characteristics to note: 007 530 Also available via the World Wide Web 740 As needed for electronic titles 776 Linking to additional physical form as needed 856

54. Subject hierarchy needs Some libraries like to have lists of electronic journals by discipline Some want this feature in the online catalog; some want it supported via a Web site Consider your needs carefully before you start Local subject heading? Local subdivision? Genre term(s)? How to implement a hierarchy?

55. Coming soon! Major revisions to Chapters 9 and 12 by the Joint Steering Committee for AACR Separately published chapter 9 in April? Harmonizing AACR with ISBD (ER) Recognizing redefinition of serial and new concept of “integrating resource” New bib lvl code, new GMD…. Stay tuned!!

56. New taxonomy of serials Now: Monographs and serials Soon: Monographs, serials, and integrating entities

57. http://lcweb.loc.gov/acq/conser/modelc.gif

63. Special characteristics to note: Type a; finite rather than integrating Most of the fields will look very familiar by now Note 650 $v Databases

64. Questions? Thank you for attending! -- Linda