1. LIRICS mid-term review 1 LIRICS WP3: Morpho-syntactic and syntactic annotations Thierry Declerck declerck@dfki.de DFKI-LT - Saarbrücken 23rd May 2006

2. LIRICS mid-term review2 Summary of the presentation WP3: 1st year objectives objectives and work done in T3.1, T3.2 status of deliverables in T3.1, T3.2 Main Achievements: SynAF NWI accepted and Working Draft discussed at ISO level Next Steps: Data Categories for Syntactic Annotation Synergies with other LIRICS WPs, ISO activities, meetings

3. LIRICS mid-term review3 Task 3.1: Survey Task 3.1: Evaluation of initiatives for morpho-syntactic and syntactic annotation. Objectives:Evaluate past and current initiatives dealing with standardisation, guidelines and recommendations for morpho-syntactic and syntactic annotation. Background for starting ISO standardization activity on syntactic annotation (model + data categories) Results: Deliverable 3.1 (V1 and V2).

4. LIRICS mid-term review4 Task 3.1 Deliverables 1st year2nd year3rd year M1M1 M2M2 M3M3 M4M4 M5M5 M6M6 M7M7 M8M8 M9M9 M10M10 M11M11 M12M12 M13M13 M14M14 M15M15 M16M16 M17M17 M18M18 M19M19 M20M20 M21M21 m22m22 M23M23 M24M24 M25M25 M26M26 M27M27 M28M28 M29M29 M30M30 WP3 T3.1 T3.2 I T3.3 I D.3.1 D.3.1 Updates D.3.1 Evaluation of initiatives for morpho-syntactic and syntactic annotation.

5. LIRICS mid-term review5 Task 3.2: ISO Proposal for a standard for Syntactic Annotation Submit to ISO TC37/SC4 a New Work Item on Syntactic Annotation, and go through the ISO procedure till the final document. Objectives: Proposal for morpho-syntactic annotation meta-model standard together with a wide coverage of data category selection formorpho-syntatic annotation Results: New Work Item on Syntactic Annotation (SynAF) succesfully submitted to ISO TC37/SC4. Ongoing Discussion on the Working Draft

6. LIRICS mid-term review6 Task 3.2: Deliverables 1st year2nd year3rd year M1M1 M2M2 M3M3 M4M4 M5M5 M6M6 M7M7 M8M8 M9M9 M10M10 M11M11 M12M12 M13M13 M14M14 M15M15 M16M16 M17M17 M18M18 M19M19 M20M20 M21M21 m22m22 M23M23 M24M24 M25M25 M26M26 M27M27 M28M28 M29M29 M30M30 WP3 T3.1 T3.2 I T3.3 I Interim Report: WD of morpho-syntatic annotation standard for CD ballot. CD of morpho-syntatic annotation standard for ISO DIS ballot

7. LIRICS mid-term review7 The SynAF Proposal Syntactic Annotation has 2 Functions in NLP 1) To represent linguistic constituencies, like Noun Phrases (NP), describing a structured sequence of morpho-syntactically annotated items, where we consider also constituents built from non-contiguous elements, and 2) To represent dependency relations dependency information can exist between morpho-syntactically annotated items within a phrase (an adjective is the modifier of the head noun within an NP) or describe a specific relation between syntactic constituents at the clausal and sentential level (i.e. an NP being the "subject" of the main verb of a clause or sentence). In the first case we speak of an internal dependency and in the second case we speak of an external dependency. But the dependency relation can also be stated including empty elements (like the pro-drop property in romance languages)

8. LIRICS mid-term review8 The SynAF Proposal (2) SynAF is concerned thus with a meta-model that covers both dimensions of syntactic constituency and dependency, and SynAF is proposing a multi-layered annotation framework that allows the combined and interrelated annotation of language data along both lines of consideration. Also the data- categories to be proposed to ISO standardization will be about the basic annotation concerning both dimensions.

9. LIRICS mid-term review9 The SynAF Proposal (3) A main starting point: Tiger The Tiger annotation framework foresees 2 types of annotation: for constituency (represented than by a node label in the annotation framework) and for dependency (represented as an edge label in the annotation framework).

10. LIRICS mid-term review10 The SynAF Proposal (4) Another starting point: ISST The approach followed in the ISST (Italian Syntax Semantic Treebank) framework, is similar to the one proposed in Tiger, in the sense that a multi-layered syntactic annotation strategy is proposed: One level for constituency and one level for dependency, with a pointing mechanism for referring from the second level to the first one.

11. LIRICS mid-term review11 Example for Tiger …..

12. LIRICS mid-term review12 Example for ISST

13. LIRICS mid-term review13 Actual Work and Next Steps Precise the Meta Model for Syntactic Annotation Establish a list of data categories for syntactic annotation. Create a profile for this in the Data Category Registry at Loria.

14. LIRICS mid-term review14 WP3 Activities, Meetings, Synergies LIRICS WPs Meetings: CNR-ILC – DFKI, 5.5.2005: convergences between morpho-syntactic and syntactic data; issues for the submission of the N W I on Syntax (SynAF) to ISO DFKI – Tilburg, 2 meetings in Nov. And Dec. 2005 on the relation betwenn argument structures and semantic roles. LORIA, CNR-ILC, DFKI, March 2006. Meeting in Paris discussing the data categories (with definition) to be included in the DCR. Redesign of DC, introduction of a profile for syntactic data categories. LIRICS Meetings Paris, 16-17.3.2005. Progress of work within WP3. Barcelona, 21-22.6.2005. LIRICS Industrial Advisory Board Meeting Barcelona, 22.6.2005 Presentation of first bulk of information relevant for lexical description Nancy, 8-9.12.2005. WP4 TDG3 Workshop: convergences between lexico-semantic representation and semantic roles in lexicon and in annotation ISO Meetings Berlin 8-9.4.2005. ISO TC37/SC4 WG4 Meetings Warsaw 21-26.08.05. Plenary meeting of ISO TC37/SC4. Presentation of SynAF proposal (which has been accepted as NWI in July 2005) ISO TC37/SC4 meeting in Jeju, Korea (January 2006). Discussion of SynAF with Asian and North American representative of standardisation bodies Joint ISO TC37/SC4, TDG3 and LIRICS meeting in Marina Del Rey: discussing with American partners the issue of semantic annotation, incuding the relation between syntactic and semantic annotation