1. The on-line HFA Monitor and national level process 2 nd ISDR Asia Pacific Partnership Meeting 11- 13 August, 2010 Incheon, Republic of Korea

2. HFA Monitor A web based monitoring system Hosted at http://www.preventionweb.net/ english/hyogo/hfa-monitoring/ Primary target user: National government

3. Outline Walkthrough of ‘HFA Monitor’ tool National level implementation process and time frame

4. HFA Monitor 3 strategic goals 22 core indicators in 5 priorities for action 5 drivers of progress 3 future outlook statements 5 levels of progress from minor progress to comprehensive achivement

27. : Regional organizations (2009-11) View interim report View report Access to authorized regional organizations View interim report

28. Accessibility of country reports

30. Demo user account User id: hfamonitordemo2010 Password: demo2010

31. National level arrangements Nominated HFA focal point facilitates inputs to online ‘HFA Monitor’ Broad, inclusive consultation across government and other stakeholders Draw on existing monitoring and review process (if available) Includes analysis of DRR progress reported in other frameworks (CCA, NAPA, MDG etc.) Supportive of national processes and feeds into national level DRR planning

32. Suggested steps Phase IBy 30 September 2010 Step 1:Identification of relevant stake holders Step 2:Grouping of stakeholders Step 3:Carry out multi stakeholder meetings/ workshops Step 4:Assemble all inputs from the working groups Step 5:Input all validated information in the web based HFA monitor system Step 6:Circulate the interim report to the working groups Step 7:Share the information as an ‘Interim’ report Phase II Step 8:Continue improving the information on the report Step 9:Finalize the report with the stakeholder group Step 10:Share the 2009- 2011 ‘Final Report’ through the HFA monitor

33. Multi stakeholder approach Examples of key stake holders

34. Identification of relevant stake holders Relevance, interest and availability Representation from a wide variety of stakeholders is essential Stakeholder mapping

35. Grouping of stakeholders Form working groups on specific areas For example: for each priority area of the HFA Multi stakeholder representation in each working group Identify facilitating organisation in each group

36. Multi stakeholder meetings Each working group meets to gather and analyze available information May use the offline report template Gather information through desk researches, field surveys and interviews

37. Assemble all inputs Through multi stakeholder participatory meetings Deliberate on the over all progress in all areas of HFA Coverage and authenticity is key

38. Input in HFA Monitor Feed information in the online tool After completion validate the report by the working groups Share it as an ‘Interim’ report By 30 September 2010

39. Finalize report Continue updating the information Finalize with the stake holder group Share as a ‘Final Report’ By May 2011

40. Discussion points Clarifications on the HFA Monitor tool Clarifications and/or suggestions on the national level processes