1. Policy and Institutional Coherence for Migration and Development: A Dashboard Dr. Melissa Siegel Elaine McGregor

2. Department 2 Background and Rationale Global discussions on M&D –Cross-cutting policy area M&D in academia –Complex relationship Policy Coherence for development

3. Department 3 Objectives To encourage policy makers to reflect on their own context To enable critical self-assessment of levels of PICMD To identify areas for improvement. To promote more efforts to understanding the links between M&D in different contexts

4. Department 4 Developing the Dashboard Establishing Concepts and Underlying Assumptions Literature Review: Causal Linkages Literature Review: Measurement of Policy Coherence Development of Prelimenary Indicators Piloting the Dashboard

5. Department 5 Definitions and Assumptions Broad definition of (human) development The choice to migrate is considered positive Measures to harness the positive links between migration and development are inherently diverse and context-specific Cumulative impact of a wide range of policies lead to greater PICMD.

6. Department 6 Literature Review: Causal Linkages Gathered sparse evidence on the impacts of migration and development policies –E.g. Visa restrictions reduce overall circulation (Czaika & de Haas, 2014) –E.g. Countries with restrictive emigration policies have less migration than similar countries (McKenzie, 2007)

7. Department 7 Literature Review: Measuring PCD No systematic approach or measurement tools Range of strategies used in other policies areas dependent on existing evidence and availability of data Clear identification of insitutional factors contributing to PCD Political commitment, interministerial bodies etc Use of indicators based on theoretical or empirically established causal linkages between policy domain and development

8. Department 8 Factors to Consider when Developing Indicators Measurable Data availability Evidence based Managable number of indicators

9. Department 9 The Dashboard Indicators are presented in three main categories –institutional indicators (applicable to both sending and receiving countries); –policy coherence indicators for migrant sending countries; –policy indicators for migrant receiving countries. Each category has four specific objectives Each indicator is identified as relating to migration policy, migration-related development policy or other policy domains. Each indicator indicates whether it is an input, output or outcome

10. Department 10 Insitutional Coherence Four objectives for ICD: 1.Migration and Development is established as a distinct policy domain, underpinned by an explicit political commitment 2.Policies are based on best available evidence 3.Effective implementation of policy commitments 4.Effective horizontal and vertical coordination across government

11. Department 11 IC1: M&D Established as Distinct Policy Domain (7 indicators) Public committment to acknowledge development in migation policies Participation in regional and global fora Ratification of conventions: C97, C143, MWC Migration taken into account in development plans

12. Department 12 IC2: Policies are Based on Best Evidence (4 indicators) Funding of independent research on migration and development Existance of a migration profile that was developed by relevant ministries in cooperation Impact evaluations conducted on programmes

13. Department 13 IC3: Effective Implementation of Policy Committments (2 indicators) Funding is allocated to programmes in the area of migration and development Funding is allocated for evaluations.

14. Department 14 IC4: Effective Vertical and Horizontal Cooperation (4 indicators) Existance of a interagency body/committee on migration and development which –meets on a regular basis; and –is representative of actors working on migration The body/office in charge of migration takes development into account

15. Department 15 Policy Coherence for Migration and Development in Destination Countries Four strategic objectives: –Reduce costs (social and monetary) of migration to facilitate (labour) mobility and make moving safer and more affordable for migrants –Effective protection of the rights of migrants and their families –Promote social cohesion and development by facilitating the integration of migrants into society and the labour market –Enhance the development impact of migration for countries of origin

16. Department 16 PCR1: Reduce costs of migration (5 indicators) Regulation framework for recruitment agencies No costs to migrants Multiple entry visas No Pre-migration integration tests No arbitrary quotas for migrants

17. Department 17 PCR2: Protection of Rights (11 indicators) Access to health care Access to education Access to labour markets Migrant unemployment rates equal to natives Right to change employer Right to join trade unions Access to justice Local voting rights (for long-term residents) Right to form associations Family reunification Portable pensions

18. Department 18 PCR3: Promotion of integration/social cohesion (7 indicators) Dual citizenship Access to citizenship Educational support for migrant children Migrant children education performance on par with natives Cost of language courses low Skill recognition mechanisms in place Cost of higher education for migrant children equal to natives

19. Department 19 PCR4: Enhance Development Impact (3 indicators) Multiple remittance service providers Remittance cost low Temporary return programmes available

20. Department 20 Limitation Data limitations The dashboard cannot identify incoherence Work in progress

21. Department 21 Thank you! melissa.siegel@maastrichtuniversity.nl e.mcgregor@maastrichtuniversity.nl