1. 1 P20 SLDS – How to Get Started 2012 MIS Conference Jeff Sellers SLDS State Support Team Carol Jenner Washington Education Research & Data Center Charles McGrew Kentucky P-20 Data Collaborative Photo credit: iStockPhoto.com

2. Carol Jenner Washington Education & Research Data Center 2

3. 3 The Washington Setting Education Research & Data Center (ERDC) is the focus of P­ 20/W work in Washington State. The Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) is developing a K-12 SLDS, which will serve as the source of K-12 data for the P-20/W system. ERDC is a state education authority by statute, based in the research division of the Office of Financial Management (also home to the state’s unit-record public baccalaureate data system). ERDC has been funded by the Legislature since 2007 and has had 2009 ARRA SLDS grant funding since 2010. We anticipate that we will soon begin to build our data warehouse.

4. 4 Think P-20! P-20/W: Longitudinal, cross-sector work – Sectors: early learning, K-12, higher education (2/4-year), workforce Focus on cohorts – a group of individuals sharing a common characteristic and observed over time (longitudinally) as a group. Two examples: – Graduates from a particular year – Entering 9 th graders in a particular year Two approaches – Outcomes for a cohort (looking forward) – Previous experiences of a cohort (looking backward) Focus on transitions across sectors: entering Kindergarten students, transition out of high school, transition from 2-year to 4-year higher ed, bachelor’s degree recipients, early leavers

5. 5 P-20 = Longitudinal, Cross-Sector Year-to-year change in 4 th grade assessment scores  Longitudinal  Cross-sector  Trend  P-20 High school assessment scores of 2009 graduates taking pre­ college mathematics in Fall 2009  Longitudinal  Cross-sector  Trend  P-20 Year-to-year postsecondary enrollment rate of previous spring high school graduates  Longitudinal  Cross-sector  Trend  P-20

6. 6 The Foundation: Identity-Matching Personal information Name, birthdate, ID numbers, demographic characteristics Contextual information Location, entry and exit dates, program participation, graduation status, GPA Deterministic and probabilistic approaches Currently using Link Plus software and home-grown routines Use of reference data Confirmation of birthdate, last 4 of SSN, name changes An on-going process

7. 7 Washington P-20 Concepts Person-Role-Organization (PRO) conceptual model – Roles include student, teacher, employee, client – Organizations include schools, colleges, classes, firms – A person may have several roles simultaneously, including several roles within an organization – Program participation, assessments, achievements, characteristics, and identifiers are all related to Person-Role-Organization Each person is associated with one P-20 ID – the person entity is used only to assign a unique P-20 ID since all characteristics and events are captured at the PRO level The P-20 ID is the product of identity matching of data both within an organization and across organizations Linking – using the P-20 ID to relate data for each individual across education sectors and employment

8. 8 Cohorts Cohorts may be Fixed – the members do not change Updatable – members may change (based on identity-matching updates, receipt of, for example) Cohorts may be Standard – well-defined and pulled on a routine basis for reporting (high school graduation class, for example) Ad hoc – the result of a special query or of a submitted list of individuals (bachelor’s degree recipients who started at a community college or participants in a particular after-school program, for example) Individual characteristics for cohort members Retained at the Person-Role-Organization level (usually no attempt to determine a “best” value for a characteristic across roles and organizations)

9. 9 Benefits of Centralized P-20 Dedicated to true P-20/W work – research that addresses critical questions. No within-sector transactional activity conducted using the P-20/W data warehouse. Lean and mean – only elements required for P-20 research and policy analysis are included in data warehouse. Investment in identity-matching is retained and improved over time. Prior studies can be replicated – “from” and “to” dates stored for all elements. Persistent research IDs can be maintained, allowing for updating of research data sets.

10. 10 What’s Working for ERDC Engaged and supportive leadership Communication – ERDC Newsflash, press releases – Well-defined critical research and policy questions – Persistence is critical Data governance – Organized consensus-based approach to data governance – Master data-sharing agreement template covering release of de- identified data (data going out) – Standard request process that applies to all Data familiarity attained through use of data Use of data to inform data warehouse development – we are “data-ready” for mapping

11. Data Governance Committee Structure Office of Financial Management Education Research & Data Center (ERDC) Data Stewards Committee Experts directly familiar with data from their agency used in research. Data Custodians Committee Technical experts responsible for the technical delivery of data to and from the warehouse. Research & Reporting Coordination Committee Policy experts who interact with agency decision-makers, stakeholders, and researchers. ERDC Guidance Committee Agency directors or deputies from agencies contributing data

12. 12 Sustainability ERDC was established as a result of Washington Learns, a governor-led 18-month review of the state’s entire education system, including workforce (2005-2006). ERDC with its focus on P-20/W has been funded since its creation in 2007. The legislature has already “bought in.” 2009 ARRA SLDS grant funding has accelerated the ERDC agenda. Increased demand for P-20/W information and efficiencies of a centralized data system will eliminate agencies’ needs for contracting out for similar work. Productivity will increase once data warehouse is in production with topic-specific data marts.

13. Teachers Who Leave Teaching Teachers who left teaching jobs matched against administrative records from Unemployment Insurance Program and Department of Retirement Systems. Source: “Who Leaves Teaching and Where Do They Go?,” Washington Education Research & Data Center, January 2011. n=4,291 n=3,411

14. “Feedback” Reports 1.High School Feedback Reports 2.Reports for community & technical colleges - Incoming students - Transfers to baccalaureate institutions 3.Reports for baccalaureate institutions - Incoming students - Workforce outcomes erdcdata.wa.gov

15. Adding Student Characteristics See www.erdc.wa.gov/briefs/pdf/201005.pdf for full report.www.erdc.wa.gov/briefs/pdf/201005.pdf All high school graduates By income status and type of institution. (Universe: 2008-09 public high school graduates) Distribution of enrollment By income status and type of institution. (Universe: 2008-09 public high school graduates enrolled in any postsecondary institution) Not enrolledOut of stateWashington privateWashington public 4-yearWashington CTC

16. Adding Community Characteristics Community-Level Median Household Income (for households with children) Census 2000 Educational Attainment and Median Household income at school district level obtained from NCES School District Demographics System. nces.ed.gov/surveys/sdds/index.aspxnces.ed.gov/surveys/sdds/index.aspx Educational AttainmentHousehold Income (Universe: 2008-09 public high school graduates in districts where educational attainment data are reported) (Universe: 2008-09 public high school graduates in districts where median household income is reported) Not enrolledOut of stateWashington privateWashington public 4-yearWashington CTC Percent of Population Age 25 and Over With Bachelor’s or Higher Degree

17. Student Employment School-Year Employment (in high school) by Student GPA at H.S. Graduation Universe: 2009 High School Graduates for whom employment status could be determined

18. Pre-College Mathematics Students: Not low-incomeStudents: Low-income By school income level [based on percentage of graduates eligible for free or reduced-price lunch (FRPL)] By student FRPL eligibility By combination of school income level and student low-income status Pre-College Math Course-Taking Rates, 2008-09 Public High School Graduates enrolled in public postsecondary institutions (both CTCs and 4-year institutions) in 2009- 10. Student low-income status is tied to FRPL eligibility. Schools are classified into three categories based on the percentage of graduates FRPL- eligible. Approximately 31,000 high school graduates are included in this analysis. 12 3

19. Uses: CCER Demonstration Project The Community Center for Education Results (CCER) is a community partnership focusing on increasing student achievement in South Seattle and South King County, Washington. For complete CCER report see www.erdc.wa.gov/briefs/pdf/R201101_CCER_Demonstration_Project.pdf.www.erdc.wa.gov/briefs/pdf/R201101_CCER_Demonstration_Project.pdf

20. 20 Memorandum of Understanding Responsibilities and Principles for Sharing and Using P-20 and Workforce Data Principle 1:Education Research and Data Center provides cross- sector, linked data to all data consumers in a consistent, transparent way. Principle 2:Education Research and Data Center maintains the P-20 and workforce data warehouse. Principle 3:Protecting the privacy of individuals is a priority. Principle 4:Partner agency data contributors (at the state and local levels) are experts at understanding and explaining the data. Principle 5:Common understanding and use of data increases its value. Complete document: www.erdc.wa.gov/datasharing/pdf/workgroup/mou_final_201109.pdfwww.erdc.wa.gov/datasharing/pdf/workgroup/mou_final_201109.pdf

21. 21 For More Information about P-20 in Washington Carol Jenner Education Research & Data Center Carol.Jenner@ofm.wa.gov www.erdc.wa.gov

22. Charles McGrew Kentucky P-20 Data Collaborative 22

23. 23 Kentucky’s Data Sharing History ACT High School Feedback Reports (1990+) The MAX Project (2003) KEN Project and P-20 (2005/07) K-12’s KIDS Project – 1st Round SLDS Grants (2006) Kentucky’s High School Feedback Reports (2007) Postsecondary Migration Study (2007) P-20 Data Collaborative -- SLDS Grants (2009) Many other items – financial aid ad hoc studies, etc.

24. 24 Kentucky P-20 – Funding and Sustainability Current and Previous Funding K-12’s KIDS Project – 1st Round SLDS Grants (2006) P-20 Data Collaborative – SLDS Grants (2009) Creating a Sustainable Business Model Governor’s proposed budget includes $600,000 per year general funds recurring dollars to sustain the P-20 Collaborative’s work. Early Childhood funds support part of the infrastructure and shared component costs. Evaluating other options including charging fees, seeking additional grant opportunities, and partnering on grants.

25. 25 P-20 Data Collaborative Governance Joe Meyer (chair) Education and Workforce Development Cabinet Secretary Dr. Terry Holliday Kentucky Department of Education, Commissioner Dr. Phil Rogers Kentucky Education Professional Standards Board Executive Director Robert King Council on Postsecondary Education, President Kentucky’s P-20 Data Collaborative is governed by a committee of four with the three founding agency heads and is chaired by the Education and Workforce Development Secretary. All project and fiscal decisions are made by this group and must be unanimous.

26. 26 Legal Authority Collaborative established through an MOA in 2009 for agencies participating in the grant. P-20 Shared Repository established in 2010 by an Executive Order with authority to match data across collaborative and other agencies. Data Ownership Each participating agency is a member. Each member owns and maintains control of its own data. Data Governance

27. 27 What is the Role of P-20? Provide better, more timely information to inform policy makers than has ever been available before by: 1.Providing a secure way to link data across agencies to show a more complete picture than any agency can do; 2.Identifying the state’s critical policy questions and developing processes to answer them either by the agencies or by bridging the gaps between agencies; and 3.Working with policy makers and stakeholders to provide the information they need in the format they need it to improve programs and services. This requires tools and expertise that each agency may not possess. P-20 is a complement and not a replacement for agency data systems unless the agencies want it to be otherwise.

28. 28 What is the Role of P-20? P-20 can centralize a number of functions that would be much more work if each agency did it themselves such as: 1.Focusing more time and resources on processes related to data matching and de-identification than agencies can currently do. 2.Providing state-level, big-picture perspective of the state’s needs without being too entrenched in a single agency perspective. 3.Maintaining resources for analysis and research centrally that can be used by all the agencies and other groups.

29. 29 Providing objective, comparable, actionable data back to schools, districts, colleges, universities, and communities that they can use to improve education. Maintaining linked data that allows for cross-agency statistics like linking high school performance to college success or linking postsecondary training to employment and earnings. Answering state and federal mandated reports that cross sectors. Providing greater transparency both for development and improvement purposes as well as for policy makers. P-20 Benefits

30. 30 What are the Questions? How well do AP, IB, and dual credit programs improve college going and college success and shorten “time to degree?” What factors in high school are better predictors of college and career success? How much do our college graduates earn and how long does it take for them to find full-time work? Which early childhood programs have the greatest impact on preparing students for Kindergarten?

31. 31 What are the Questions? How many high school graduates leave Kentucky to go to college and return here to live and work? How successful are programs like GearUp, TRIO, etc. in terms of encouraging more disadvantaged students to attend and succeed in college? What proportion of our college graduates leave the state to work? Which teacher preparation programs’ graduates have the greatest impact on student learning?

32. Kentucky High School Feedback Report In- and out-of-state college going rates Public and private colleges included Rates broken out by ACT categories College readiness rates by academic subject (English, Math, Reading) Rates broken by ethnicity, economic groups, and other student categories List of colleges attended

33. High School GPAs and College Readiness How well are High School GPA and ACT Composites Aligned?

34. Do Students’ College Readiness Rates Vary Based on Where Their Teachers Went to College? * Preliminary data from school districts where more than 50% of teachers completed their bachelor’s degree from a single institution 34 Percent of Students Not Ready for College Level Math by Teacher Preparation Program

35. Kentucky’s History of Using Data

36. Kentucky’s P-20 Architecture CPE Postsecondary CPE Postsecondary CPE Adult Education CPE Adult Education KDE K-12 Students KDE K-12 Students EPSB Teacher Cert. EPSB Teacher Cert. 24/7 Secure Data Collection, Processing, and Matching 24/7 Secure Data Collection, Processing, and Matching De-Identified Files and Reporting System De-Identified Files and Reporting System Data SourcesData Users Agencies State Researchers Public Reports via Web Portal Reports via Web Portal Early Childhood Early Childhood P-20 Staff P-20 Staff Workforce

37. 37 Why Kentucky Chose a Stand- Alone System Architecture For agencies that don’t have their own system and reporting tools, it is less expensive to bring their data into the P-20 structure and use our licenses than build their own “silos” and try to link them together. Think beyond P-20 to a true state data system. Stand-alone system is less prone to agency data system issues because it only depends on the agencies when new or updated data are needed. Matching processes become better over time and incomplete agency level data can be made more complete (holes can be filled in over time with other sources) when it is all together. Less upkeep and agency involvement in routine activities. System runs regardless of any changes in agency data systems or out-of-firewall network issues. Centralize access makes it easier to monitor and audit third-party use of the system for researchers and others.

38. 38 Why Kentucky Chose a Stand- Alone System Architecture In situations where some state agencies have had a poor reputation for providing accurate data, it can help to insulate P-20 and gain more support from policy makers as an objective source of information. Centralized access makes it easier to monitor and audit third-party use of the system for researchers and others in one location than if each agency did it separately. Centralization provides analysts and researchers to support multiple agencies in their use of the data. Stand-alone systems allow for intensive analysis of the data in blocks of time to identify issues like changing definitions and data quality problems that are too time intensive to do “on the fly.”

39. 39 Overview of the P-20 Core System

40. 40 Matching Records Across Sources Names (and all of their iterations) SSNs Agency Identification Numbers Date of Birth Gender Ethnicity School and District County and Zip Code Maintaining data that change over time to allow for additional longitudinal matching of older records Others as needed by the source

41. 41 Sustainable P-20 Success Data have to be available, understandable, and people have to be aware of where they can find information. Confidential data must be kept confidential either as files or in prepared reports. Cell-size minimums are not enough. There is a difference between reporting data responsibly and interpreting it. What is P-20’s charge here? The audience’s needs have to be identified. Use focus groups when developing new reports. Allow for ample vetting time for reports and studies. Provide information to data owners and others affected when data requests are answered. Trust is an important factor. Presentations, publications, and having P-20 recognized as a source of vital information. Leadership has to be respected and actively pushing the value of the process and system. Agencies, policy makers, and others should publicly support the importance of the system and use it for decision making.

42. 42 For More Information about P-20 in Kentucky Charles McGrew Executive Director P-20 Data Collaborative charles.mcgrew@ky.gov kentuckyp20.ky.gov

43. Questions? 43