Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Scope of geoscience education research (GER) and how it can be used: Community perspectives Laura A. Lukes, Ph.D. Assistant Director, Center for Teaching.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Scope of geoscience education research (GER) and how it can be used: Community perspectives Laura A. Lukes, Ph.D. Assistant Director, Center for Teaching."— Presentation transcript:

1 Scope of geoscience education research (GER) and how it can be used: Community perspectives Laura A. Lukes, Ph.D. Assistant Director, Center for Teaching & Faculty Excellence Assistant Professor, Atmospheric, Oceanic, and Earth Sciences George Mason University

2 The big picture: Discipline-Based Education Research (DBER) Discipline-Based Education Research (DBER): “investigates learning and teaching in a discipline from a perspective that reflects the discipline’s priorities, worldview, knowledge, and practices” (DBER Report, 2012) Physics Education Research (PER) Chemistry Education Research (CER) Engineering Education Research (EER) Biology Education Research (BER) Math Education Research (MER) DBER is generally associated with STEM disciplines… Geoscience Education Research (GER) Astronomy Education Research (AER)

3 Situating geoscience education researchers in disciplinary expertise Educational Psychology Geoscience Teaching Practice X Source: Lukes, et al., 2015

4 Types of collaborations Type of collaboration InterdisciplinaryMultidisciplinaryTransdisciplinary Description‘‘Researchers interact with the goal of transferring knowledge from one discipline to another. Allows researchers to inform each other’s work and compare individual findings’’ (TREC) ‘‘Researchers from a variety of disciplines work together at some point during a project, but have separate questions, separate conclusions, and disseminate in different journals’’ (TREC) ‘‘Collaboration in which exchanging information, altering discipline-specific approaches, sharing resources and integrating disciplines achieves a common scientific goal (Rosenfield, 1992).’’ Example in GER InTeGrateGARNETVan der Hoeven et al. (2011)

5 Sorting out research from practice Teaching practice “Scholarly”/Reflective practice Scholarship of Teaching & Learning (SoTL) Formal Research on Geoscience T & L This is what I do… I do this because evidence shows… Did that go the way I wanted? Data says…Why/why not? This was observed. We can measure it this way because… (methods) This was observed. We can measure it this way because… (methods) Previous work indicates…, let’s test it in a new situation! We systematically observed this. Data indicate… This is what I did and why. The data showed this and these are my thoughts on the experience & how this could inform your practice. PEER REVIEW

6 Situating geoscience education research in publications Educational Psychology Geoscience Teaching Practice X Source: Lukes, et al., 2015 Examples of practice Resources/tools to use to support practice Mechanics & logistics of pedagogy

7 GER in publication Study situated in literature-based context Conclusions/claims supported by evidence Research Paper Curriculum Paper Theoretical: describing new theories to fill gaps Describe new instructional materials & evidence of effectiveness Scholarship of Teaching & Learning (SoTL) Empirical: Data collection / analyses to answer Q or test hypothesis Empirical: Data collection / analyses to answer Q or test hypothesis Review Paper Instruction Paper Describe new teaching methods & evidence of effectiveness Commentary Paper

8 Approaches & methods to conducting GER Variations in epistemologies and ontologies influence researcher choices regarding general approaches and specific methods for collecting/types of data collected and the data analysis techniques used to interpret data Ontology = assumption about the nature of reality Epistemology = set of assumptions about the relationship between the “knower” and the “known” Ontology = assumption about the nature of reality Epistemology = set of assumptions about the relationship between the “knower” and the “known”

9 Examples What are the key misconceptions in geoscience & what are effective strategies to facilitate conceptual change? How do novices differ from experts when visualizing and interpreting field data? How are learning outcomes measured when K-12 educational standards are changing? What are the critical factors that influence a student to choose to major in geoscience?

10 What do we know about the community so far? What are members hoping to get from NAGT-GER? Opportunities to network w/GERers News about funding opportunities News about GER conducted at other institutions Strategies for developing GER program PD on designing a GER project PD on mixed and quantitative methods Data source: NAGT-GER 2014 member needs survey (n=91)

11 What is a community of practice? “group of people who share a concern, a set of problems, or a passion about a topic, and who deepen their knowledge and expertise in this area by interacting on an ongoing basis” (Wegner, 2002) Formal structures can facilitate and cultivate community (but are not inherently community)

12 Why is a GER community needed? GED community is very broad and undefined (Feig, 2013) DBER folks have unique expertise, needs, and roles that create feelings of isolation (Feig, 2013) Educational Psychology Geoscience Teaching Practice X Source: Lukes, et al., 2014 Figure-Situating geoscience education researchers in disciplinary expertise

13 Community perspectives: Your turn!

14 In your mind, what are the top two or three most important outcomes of GER? And why? How does GER inform your teaching or how might it? What do you wish you knew about GER practice and products?


Download ppt "Scope of geoscience education research (GER) and how it can be used: Community perspectives Laura A. Lukes, Ph.D. Assistant Director, Center for Teaching."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google