Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Southern California Water Committee March 26, 2010 Ontario KARLA NEMETH, Natural Resources Agency.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Southern California Water Committee March 26, 2010 Ontario KARLA NEMETH, Natural Resources Agency."— Presentation transcript:

1 Southern California Water Committee March 26, 2010 Ontario KARLA NEMETH, Natural Resources Agency

2 Why is the Delta Important? Unique Environment Confluence of CA’s two biggest watersheds 750 plant and animal species More than 40 threatened and endangered species Economy and infrastructure Agriculture, recreation, transportation, energy reserves, flood protection Water conveyance Drinking water for 25 million people Irrigation for ~3 million acres of farmland

3 Where are we today? Pelagic Organism Decline ESA lawsuits re: delta smelt and salmon Additional species candidates for listing Green Sturgeon Longfin smelt Drought

4 Water How Water Currently Flows Across the Delta 11 San Joaquin River 22 Sac River Reverses Reverses33 SWP Pumps CVP Pumps Sac River Delta Cross Channel – Mokelumne River – Old & Middle River Sac River – Delta Cross Channel – Mokelumne River – Old & Middle Rivers South Delta River Reversals River Reversals Ocean/Tidal High salinity

5 What is the BDCP? ESA - HCPNCCPA - NCCP + + + = Water supply reliability Stable and healthy fish populations Conservation Strategy Aspects of implementation Conservation Plan Multiple species, contribute to long- recovery

6 Equal Goals Water Supply Focus

7 Equal Goals Ecosystem Focus

8 It is a major challenge to restore an ecosystem in an environment like the Delta that is highly altered and largely unnatural.

9 Planning Agreement – 2006 Stressors identified; Options evaluated Points of Agreement Document – 2007 Independent Science Reports BDCP Conservation Principles Adaptive Management Terrestrial Species Overview of Draft Conservation Strategy – 2009 Modeling Preliminary Draft Conservation Strategy – Fall/Winter 2010 9 Plan Development

10 North Delta Water Agency California Farm Bureau Federation California Resources Agency Contra Costa Water District Friant Water Authority US Fish and Wildlife Service* CA Department of Fish and Game* National Marine Fisheries Service* *Ex Officio status American Rivers Defenders of Wildlife Environmental Defense Fund Natural Heritage Institute The Bay Institute The Nature Conservancy Department of Water Resources Bureau of Reclamation Santa Clara Valley Water District Kern County Water Agency Metropolitan Water District of Southern California San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority Mirant Energy Westlands Water District Zone 7 Water Agency PREs Environmental organizations Other organizations Fish Agencies Steering Committee

11 Delta smelt Longfin smelt Chinook Salmon –winter, spring, fall and late fall Green and white sturgeon Central valley steelhead Sacramento splittail About 48 terrestrial species Covered Species

12 Aquatic Conservation Measures Biological Goals & Objectives For Covered Fish Species Improve survival Improve fitness Improve distribution Improve growth rate Decrease mortality Habitat Restoration Conservation Actions Phytoplankton and zooplankton (fish food) Spawning and rearing Other Stressors Conservation Actions Reduce contaminants Reduce predation effects Improve fish passage Reduce Disease Reduce non-natives Water Operations Conservation Actions Improve water quality Reduce entrainment Improve water flow and habitat conditions

13 Dual Conveyance Flow and Habitat Fundamentals East/west flow pattern 11 SWP Pumps CVP Pumps Ocean/Tidal High salinity Habitat interaction 22 Water reliability and quality 33

14 Draft Conservation Strategy – Major Elements Habitat Restoration Up to 80,000 acres tidal marsh, riparian, and floodplain Enhanced floodplain in the Yolo Bypass- temporary inundation 20-40 linear miles channel restoration Water Facilities & Operations North Delta diversion  5 intakes  15,000 cfs design capacity  Tunnel/Pipeline subject of focused study in BDCP  Minimum flows to ensure healthy habitat and water quality  Sacramento River flows are always greater than exports Other Stressors Reduce methylmercury Remove non-native aquatic plants Reduce illegal harvest Establish hatchery and genetic management plans Support Delta and longfin smelt propagation programs Reduce predators Construct non-physical barriers to re-direct juvenile salmonids

15 Draft Conversation Strategy - Flows Inflow requirements Outflow requirements and management of X2 Rio Vista Flow Requirements Delta Cross Channel gate operations Ratio between San Joaquin River inflow and South Delta exports Old and Middle River flows New North Delta diversion bypass flows Water quality standards set forth in State Board rule D-1641 Preferential South Delta diversions

16 Channel Margin – 20 to 40 linear miles Floodplain (new) – up to 10,000 acres Tidal Marsh – up to 65,000 acres Riparian – 5,000 acres Floodplain (enhanced existing) Potential Tunnel Conveyance 35 miles twin bore 33’ ID 8 miles single bore 23’ – 33’ ID intake tunnel Forebay in the north with 750 acres of water surface area +/- 150’ deep 5 Intakes between Freeport to Courtland Potential Habitat Restoration

17 Five water intake facilities along the Sacramento River, between Freeport and Courtland Isolated Conveyance Facility (East/West/Tunnel) Through-Delta (armoring the Delta) Dual Conveyance System BDCP Conveyance Options

18 Natural Communities & Terrestrial Species 48 Species for Coverage 70,000 acres tidal marsh/riparian restoration also supports 28 terrestrial species Propose approx. 45,000 additional acres Total Terrestrial Restoration Target approx 101,000 – 115,000 acres

19 Key Issues - Conservation Strategy Refine/determine proposed conservation measures. –Effects of plan on biological resources, other scientific efforts –Climate change –Design aspects of conveyance (pipeline/canal) Metrics, monitoring and adaptive management Coordination with other conservation plans in the Delta –Address conflicts between aquatic and terrestrial habitat restoration

20 Key Issues & Challenges Regulatory assurances in light of scientific uncertainty Cost and financing of conveyance, habitat restoration, and other stressor measures Limited control over other factors affecting fish species By whom and how the plan would be implemented Public support

21 Public Input & Schedule Delta Community Workshops Held in 2009 –Technical focus on draft conservation strategy Ongoing Steering Committee Meetings- Open to the Public Ongoing Stakeholder Briefings –Local jurisdictions, Recreational interests, Water users, Agriculture, Tribes, Environmental Justice communities Public Draft Conservation Plan – Fall 2010

22 Environmental Review Process

23 Karla Nemeth 916-651-7587 Karla.nemeth@resources.ca.gov www.baydeltaconservationplan.com


Download ppt "Southern California Water Committee March 26, 2010 Ontario KARLA NEMETH, Natural Resources Agency."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google