1. DataDirector: Creating Exams Winter/Spring 2011 Stan Masters Lenawee ISD

2. POP Purpose –train DataDirector users to plan, create, and administer local standards-based assessments instruments Objectives –I can develop an exam blueprint –I can choose items to add to my exam –I can create an online key for my students –I can identify exam reports I will use with others Procedures –PowerPoint presentation –Use of LISD DataDirector site –Use of LISD Data Warehouse webpage

3. School Improvement Process

4. WE MUST UTILIZE AN INQUIRY APPROACH TO DATA ANALYSIS WE MUST USE MULTIPLE SOURCES OF DATA We need a data warehouse for our 21 st century schools WE MUST FOCUS ON DATA TO INCREASE STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT Talking Points for the Purpose of Implementing a Data Warehouse in Lenawee Schools

5. Source: Presentation by Dr. Victoria Bernhardt, April 2007

6. FERPA/HIPAA Pre-Test You are in charge of a staff meeting to study student achievement on school improvement goals. As part of your meeting, you are showing a report to the entire staff that shows student scores on a common local assessment. The report shows the student names. In addition, you have given them a paper copy of the report. It is a violation of FERPA to display the results of the assessment to the entire staff. The exception would be a group of teachers working on a specific student strategies, as they are a specific population that then has a “legitimate educational interest” in the information.

7. Existing Summative and Formative Classroom Tests Not Aligned with Expectations Classroom Summative and Formative Tests Aligned to Expectations Common Classroom Summative and Formative Assessments Aligned to Expectations Common Formative and Summative Assessments Aligned to Expectations and Delivered Online Through DataDirector Implementing Exams with DataDirector Adapted from St. Clair RESA

8. assessment for learning –formative (monitors student progress during instruction) –placement (given before instruction to gather information on where to start) –diagnostic (helps find the underlying causes for learning problems) –interim (monitor student proficiency on learning targets) assessment of learning –summative (the final task at the end of a unit, a course, or a semester) Purposes of Assessments Sources: Stiggins, Richard J, Arter, Judith A., Chappuis, Jan, Chappius, Stephen. Classroom Assessment for Student Learning. Assessment Training Institute, Inc., Portland, Oregon, 2004. Bravmann, S. L., “P-I Focus: One test doesn’t fit all”, Seattle Post-Intelligencer, May 2, 2004.Seattle Post-Intelligencer Marshall, K. (2006) “Interim Assessments: Keys to Successful Implementation”. NewYork: New Leaders for New Schools.“Interim Assessments: Keys to Successful Implementation”.

9. What Do We Ask Ourselves Before Building an Exam Instrument? What do we want to measure? What information do we want to gather? How long do we want the assessment to take? How will we determine which standards we want to assess? How will we use the results?

10. Guiding Principles for Building Exams A minimum of three items for every standard you want to measure. Spread items measuring an individual standard across the assessment. Range of overall assessment difficulty and for each standard measured. Begin assessment with easier items, build to more difficult and conclude with easier items.

11. Cognitive Difficulty Levels Level 1 - Basic Skills  requires students to recall information such as facts, definitions, terms, or simple one-step procedures Level 2 - Conceptual Understanding  requires students to make some decisions as to how to approach the problem or activity and may imply more than a single step Level 3 - Extended Reasoning  require students to develop a strategy to connect and relate ideas in order to solve the problem while using multiple steps and drawing upon a variety of skills.

12. Level One: Basic Skills Support ideas by reference to details in text Use dictionary to find meaning Identify figurative language in passage Solve a one step word problem Perform a specified procedure

13. Level 2: Conceptual Understanding Predict logical outcome Identify and summarize main points Represent a situation mathematically in more than one way. Interpret a visual representation

14. Level 3: Extended Reasoning Determine effect of author’s purpose on text elements Summarize information from multiple sources Provide a mathematical justification Describe, compare and contrast solution methods

15. Psychometrician’s Vocabulary ValidityValidity –What kind of concrete evidence can we collect that a test measures what we say it measures? –Do the results of using the test give the consequences we expect? ReliabilityReliability –What is the measure of the amount of error in a test? –What is the percent of the differences (variance) in the scores that is attributable to the trait being assessed? William H. Trochim, Research Methods Knowledge Base, www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/rel%26val.htm, accessed 3/23/06, www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/rel%26val.htm

16. Reliability Source: Ernie Bauer and Ed Roeber, “Technical Standards for Locally-Developed Assessments”, April 8, 2010 Longer tests are more reliable. Tests with a narrow range of content are more reliable. Appropriately difficult tests (neither too hard nor too easy) are more reliable. Clearly worded items make more reliable tests. Reliability can be trumped by validity.

17. Validity Source: Ernie Bauer and Ed Roeber, “Technical Standards for Locally-Developed Assessments”, April 8, 2010 The evidence we collect depends on the inference we wish to make –Content validity - is there evidence to show the test measures what it says it measures? –Predictive validity - is there evidence that shows that the test predicts what it is we want it to predict? –Concurrent validity - does this test measure the same thing as another measure, only easier to use? –Construct validity - does this test measure the psychological construct we are trying to measure?

18. Use a blueprint to build validity Source: Ernie Bauer and Ed Roeber, “Technical Standards for Locally-Developed Assessments”, April 8, 2010 A grid is used to summarizes the content and format of the test. –The rows are the learning objectives –The columns are the level of cognitive complexity The cells list the types and numbers of items. You can place a margin that can be used to sum the total points.

19. Reverse Design Source: Ernie Bauer, and Jim Gullen, “Locally Developed Assessment: What Do the Results Mean?”, April 2010 Start with your items Group the items by content (GLCE/HSCE) –This will give you the rows for the blueprint Split the items in the content piles by DOK –This will give you the columns for the blueprint Create a blueprint document to check if this provides acceptable evidence for you.

20. Naming Conventions Assessment and Exams –School Year (e.g., 2008-2009) –Name of Course/Grade (e.g.,US History and Geography or 4 th Grade) –Name of Assessment or Exam (e.g., World War II, EXPLORE, or Dolch Words) You may also identify the timing of the assessment –(e.g., Beginning, Middle, End or Fall/Spring or Pre/Post)

21. Questions? Stan Masters Coordinator of Instructional Data Services Lenawee Intermediate School District 2946 Sutton Road Adrian, Michigan 49921 517-265-1606 (phone) 517-263-7079 (fax) stan.masters@lisd.us Data Warehouse webpage: https://webapps.lisd.us/sites/Curriculum/Pages/DataWarehousing.aspx