1. Making sense of cultural and economic change: Qualitative insights from the Three cities programme Pete Seaman and Fiona Edgar Glasgow Centre for Population Health

2. Background Glasgow’s ‘excess mortality’ is 30% higher than Liverpool and Manchester. This is found across genders, all (adult) age groups and the social spectrum (Walsh, Bendel, Hanlon et al 2013) No one single cause is likely to explain the ‘excess’. More likely a combination of interacting factors T he ‘socio-cultural hypothesis’: that Glasgow differs from Liverpool and Manchester in terms of its cultural outlook and perspective

3. What is the ‘socio-cultural’ hypothesis? That Glasgow finds a different expression of the following collective traits: Psychological outlook Glasgow residents have lower aspirations and ‘time preferences’ than those in Liverpool and Manchester Glasgow has a different enactment of family life Glasgow has limited social mobility in comparison with the other two cities Social capital is lower in Glasgow than the other cities It is social capital that I focus on today but bear in mind there is much overlap between the categories

4. Methodology 50 Key informant interviews Sampling strategy –Nine areas selected to represent socio- economically difference (‘deprived’, ‘middle’ and ‘affluent’) across the cities –3 ‘types’ of key informants for each area 1) ‘Mediated’ – professional knowledge 2) ‘Action’ – engagement with problems 3) ‘Lived’ – local activists and residents

5. Fieldwork coverage ‘Deprived’‘Middle’ ‘Non deprived’ Total Interviews (participants) Glasgow Interviews G1 6 G2 6 G36G36 18 (18) Liverpool Interviews L14L14 L2 4 L3 311 (12) Manchester Interviews M1 5 M2 5 M3 515 (17) Total interviews (participants) 15 (15)15 (17)14 (15)44 (47) In total, 46 interviews (50 participants) - Area specific: 44 interviews (47 participants) - Wider context: 2 interviews (3 participants)

6. Findings: responding to change in the nine communities Three dimensions of change: Economic dimensions Political/welfare dimensions Shifting understandings and enactments of ‘community’ as a lived concept –Changing importance of ‘place’

7. Types of social capital Bonding capital: links with similar people, with similar outlooks and values. Good for personal support Bridging capital: links with people with different outlooks and values. Good for taking advantage of new opportunities Linking capital: Links made with people in power, influence and structures that make decisions that affect your life and community

8. Community transitions in relation to social capital: Deprived neighbourhoods AreaBondingBridgingLinking Glasgow ‘deprived’ “Families standing alone” Atomised experiences Poor connections to geographically distant employment opportunities Reduced: Once “fought for everything it got”. Now alienation from politics and decision-makers Manchester ‘deprived’ Tight, hyperlocal networks Poor connections to geographically close employment opportunities Cultural distance between service providers and users Liverpool ‘deprived’ Strong sense of local social solidarity (city- level) Concerns about growing transience (private landlords and difficulty integrating newcomers) Reluctant cultural distance between service providers and clients. Mistrust of mainstream politics- preference for local action

9. “ Families standing alone” Points to decline in trust and collective values “There is a strong sense of family life but whether it is right sense or a wrong sense who knows. I mean parents will stick up for their kids no matter what they do. They won’t look at the other side, there’s some families that’ll not look at the other side and just weigh in and stick up for their kids no matter what” Glasgow 1,Lived 3

10. Community transitions in relation to social capital AreaBondingBridgingLinking Glasgow ‘deprived’ “Families standing alone” Atomised experiences Poor connections to geographically distant employment opportunities Reduced: Once “fought for everything it got”. Now alienation from politics and decision-makers Manchester ‘deprived’ Tight, hyperlocal networks Poor connections to geographically close employment opportunities Cultural distance between service providers and users Liverpool ‘deprived’ Strong sense of local social solidarity (city- level) Concerns about growing transience (private landlords and difficulty integrating newcomers) Reluctant cultural distance between service providers and clients. Mistrust of mainstream politics- preference for local action

11. Example: Manchester deprived, disconnection from opportunity and mainstream values Opportunity on doorstep but respondents operate discourse of cultural deficits locally. “We’ve got to keep making sure the economic growth is there. But getting local people to pick up that opportunity, that’s the real objective” Action 3 “So it’s about trying to change things and make people feel more aspirational” Mediated 1

12. Community transitions in relation to social capital AreaBondingBridgingLinking Glasgow ‘deprived’ “Families standing alone” Atomised experiences Poor connections to geographically distant employment opportunities Reduced: Once “fought for everything it got”. Now alienation from politics and decision-makers Manchester ‘deprived’ Tight, hyperlocal networks Poor connections to geographically close employment opportunities Cultural distance between service providers and users Liverpool ‘deprived’ Strong sense of local social solidarity (city- level) Concerns about growing transience (private landlords and difficulty integrating newcomers) Mistrust of mainstream politics- preference for local action

13. Example: Liverpool, city level solidarity highly valued “I think what really comes across in the culture here is local people supporting local people. No one likes to see anyone down on their knees.”

14. Community transitions in relation to social capital AreaBondingBridgingLinking Glasgow ‘affluent’ Small local networks established around child-rearing or professional identities High degree of boundary maintenance with local areas Investment in children's futures over collective improvement Manchester ‘affluent’ Highly mobile population. Concerns about isolation of elders Transient but skilled population Lifestyle and identity driven projects Liverpool ‘affluent’ Two parents out at work means bonding links tend to be within families Community activity thought more likely during retirement City –level solidarity Concerns about diminishing returns on higher education

15. Liquid community “ Well, they’ll have some close friends, but some will be wider. They might have a friend at the other side of the world, because you get people who’ve had to travel for their work. There’s a lot more people who do contract work and they might be out somewhere like Dubai, somewhere like that … if opportunities arise, I’ve seen some people go to Africa to do work. … Their job means they’re jet setting all over the place Glasgow (but could also be Manchester)

16. Community transitions in relation to social capital AreaBondingBridgingLinking Glasgow ‘affluent’ Small local networks established around child-rearing or professional identities High degree of boundary maintenance with local areas Investment in children's futures over collective improvement Manchester ‘affluent’ Highly mobile population. Concerns about isolation of elders Transient but skilled population Lifestyle and identity driven projects Liverpool ‘affluent’ Two parents out at work means bonding links tend to be within families Community activity thought more likely during retirement City –level solidarity Concerns about diminishing returns on higher education

17. What it means? Community means different things in different contexts –Some communities remain strongly wedded to notions of geographical community –Economic life, in contrast, is more mobile. –‘Embedded’ and ‘disembedded’ communities have different strengths and weakness

18. What does this add to understanding Glasgow’s ‘excess mortality’? The ‘three cities’ are not as similar as they seem on statistical indicators Manchester: more advanced adaptation to ‘liquid modern’ idea of community and this highlights a different economic trajectory Liverpool: city –level commitment to social solidarity may be protective. Shows how collectivism can be re-imagined after decline of class-based politics Glasgow: sits between with a ‘liquid’ affluent experience and a ‘solid’ deprived one. Therefore, advantage does not flow from affluent area to others