Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

LYSD and State AYP Comparisons. LYSD Schools Meeting AYP AYP LevelTitle 1 School Emmonak SchoolLevel 5 (1 st year meeting AYP)YES Marshall SchoolLevel.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "LYSD and State AYP Comparisons. LYSD Schools Meeting AYP AYP LevelTitle 1 School Emmonak SchoolLevel 5 (1 st year meeting AYP)YES Marshall SchoolLevel."— Presentation transcript:

1 LYSD and State AYP Comparisons

2 LYSD Schools Meeting AYP AYP LevelTitle 1 School Emmonak SchoolLevel 5 (1 st year meeting AYP)YES Marshall SchoolLevel 5 (1 st year meeting AYP)YES Pitkas Point SchoolMeets AYPYES Russian Mission SchoolLevel 2 (1 st year meeting AYP)YES LYSD Schools Not Making AYP AYP LevelTitle 1 School Alakanuk SchoolLevel 5 (5 th year)YES Hooper Bay SchoolLevel 5 (7 th year)YES Ignatius Beans SchoolLevel 5 (4 th year)YES Kotlik SchoolLevel 5 (5 th year)YES Pilot Station SchoolLevel 2YES Scammon Bay SchoolLevel 5 (4 th year)YES Sheldon Point SchoolLevel 5 (5 th year)YES Note: Once a school has reached Level 2, it must meet AYP for two consecutive years to be removed from the list of schools that need improvement.

3 Lower Yukon School District 2002-2010 AYP Language Arts and Mathematics Scores

4 Lower Yukon School District 2002-2010 AYP Language Arts and Mathematics Scores 14% increase in Language Arts from 02/03 to 09/10 13% increase in Mathematics from 02/03 50 09/10

5 State of Alaska 2002-2010 AYP Language Arts and Mathematics Scores

6 State of Alaska 2002-2010 AYP Language Arts and Mathematics Scores 5% increase in Language Arts from 02/03 to 09/10 5% increase in Mathematics from 02/03 to 09/10

7 State Achievement Gap 2010 – AYP Proficiency Rates Language ArtsMathematics 2010200320102003 All Students78.28%72.61%71.37%65.76% Native American57.37%48.95%53.12%45.62% Caucasian87.56%83.93%80.04%76.25% Students with Disabilities45.59%32.63%40.99%28.76% Students without Disabilities84.20%78.91%76.87%71.69% Gap Between Native American and Caucasian -30.19%-34.98%-26.92%-30.63% Gap Between Students with Disabilities and Students without Disabilities -38.61%-46.27%-35.87%-42.93%

8

9  SBA-Standard Based Assessment (grades 3-10)  Type of summative testing given once a year  The purpose of the Standards Based Assessments (SBAs) is to determine on a statewide basis the extent to which students are meeting statewide performance standards  The SBA’s measure what students know and are able to do at their grade level as compared to the Alaska Performance Standards/Grade Level Expectations.  Currently test reading, writing,mathematics & science (grades 4, 8, 10)

10 State SBA Performance Summary Grades 3-10 % Proficient 2005-2010

11 LYSD SBA Performance Summary Grades 3-10 % Proficient 2005-2010

12 State SBA Performance Summary 3 rd Grade % Proficient 2005-2010

13 LYSD SBA Performance Summary 3 rd Grade % Proficient 2005-2010

14 LYSD SBA Performance Summary 4th Grade % Proficient 2005-2010

15 State SBA Performance Summary 4th Grade % Proficient 2005-2010

16 State SBA Performance Summary 5th Grade % Proficient 2005-2010

17 LYSD SBA Performance Summary 5th Grade % Proficient 2005-2010

18 State SBA Performance Summary 6th Grade % Proficient 2005-2010

19 LYSD SBA Performance Summary 6th Grade % Proficient 2005-2010

20 State SBA Performance Summary 7th Grade % Proficient 2005-2010

21 LYSD SBA Performance Summary 7th Grade % Proficient 2005-2010

22 State SBA Performance Summary 8th Grade % Proficient 2005-2010

23 LYSD SBA Performance Summary 8th Grade % Proficient 2005-2010

24 State SBA Performance Summary 9th Grade % Proficient 2005-2010

25 LYSD SBA Performance Summary 9th Grade % Proficient 2005-2010

26 State SBA Performance Summary 10th Grade % Proficient 2005-2010

27 LYSD SBA Performance Summary 10th Grade % Proficient 2005-2010

28

29  HSGQE-High School Graduation Qualifying Exam  Type of summative testing-usually given once or twice a year  First administered to students in the spring of their sophomore year.  Students who are not proficient on portions of the exam must retake the exam at least once yearly while in school until they have passed.  Currently test reading, writing and mathematics

30 LYSD HSGQE Performance Summary 10th Grade % Proficient 2005-2010 Number Tested 136 132 139 138 135 136 128 130 127 128 121 124 90 93 92

31 Alakanuk HSGQE Performance Summary 10th Grade % Proficient 2005-2010 Number Tested 10 11 10 11 889889 999999 14 13 14

32 Emmonak HSGQE Performance Summary 10th Grade % Proficient 2005-2010 Number Tested 15 17 19 18 15 14 19 20 9 10

33 Hopper Bay HSGQE Performance Summary 10th Grade % Proficient 2005-2010 Number Tested 30 31 22 21 32 34 33 22 24 23 24 20 21

34 Ignatius Beans HSGQE Performance Summary 10th Grade % Proficient 2005-2010 Number Tested 15 13 14 20 17 18 17 16 21 20 799799

35 Kotlik HSGQE Performance Summary 10th Grade % Proficient 2005-2010 Number Tested 14 22 14 13 12 13 899899 776776

36 Marshall HSGQE Performance Summary 10th Grade % Proficient 2005-2010 Number Tested 10 9 10 999999 555555 999999 13 777777

37 Pilot Station HSGQE Performance Summary 10th Grade % Proficient 2005-2010 Number Tested 19 17 20 17 333333 11 12 887887

38 Russian Mission HSGQE Performance Summary 10th Grade % Proficient 2005-2010 Number Tested 777777 555555 888888 777777 10 11 2 3 2

39 Scammon Bay HSGQE Performance Summary 10th Grade % Proficient 2005-2010 Number Tested 11 10 11 10 22 16 15 12 13

40 Sheldon Point HSGQE Performance Summary 10th Grade % Proficient 2005-2010 Number Tested 777777 555555 888888 777777 10 11 2 3 2

41

42


Download ppt "LYSD and State AYP Comparisons. LYSD Schools Meeting AYP AYP LevelTitle 1 School Emmonak SchoolLevel 5 (1 st year meeting AYP)YES Marshall SchoolLevel."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google