1. Slide 1 Introduction to Central Services Branch Building a caring correctional system that truly belongs to all Electronic Monitoring in Community Corrections Presentation to Portfolio Committee Date:04.03.2008

2. Slide 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS : SLIDE 3 ELECTRONIC MONITORING : SLIDES 4 - 18 INMATE TRACKING : SLIDES 19 - 29

3. Slide 3 Acronyms DCS Department of Correctional Services EMElectronic Monitoring GPSGlobal Positioning System GSMGlobal System for Mobile Communications ATDAwaiting Trial Detainee FMDField Monitoring Device ICT Information & Communication Technology CSIR Council for Scientific & Industrial Research MTEFMedium Term Expenditure Framework ATDAwaiting Trial Detainee PTDPersonal Tracking Device MATDManagement of Trial Detainee A & RAdmission & Release RDOMS Remand Detainee & Offender Management System SITAState Information Technology Agency IJSIntegrated Justice System

4. Slide 4 Department’s Principled Position Statement Electronic Monitoring cannot be deployed primarily to alleviate overcrowding but encourage maximum community participation in crime prevention and rehabilitation Department of Correctional Services believes that deployment of technology remains an enabler for improved service delivery HISTORICAL BACKGROUND

5. Slide 5 Previous Attempts to Deploy Electronic Monitoring Department of Correctional Services piloted electronic monitoring after introduction of parole & correctional supervision in 1999 (Pretoria area) A further Feasibility Study was conducted in 2004 The Results of the Pilot and Feasibility Study The pilot supported the usefulness of the electronic monitoring, however Pilot showed incarceration cost R14,75 and electronic monitoring R12,82 The Feasibility Study results showed that areas potentially covered by electronic monitoring could not match the offender population HISTORICAL BACKGROUND

6. Slide 6 The Results of the Pilot and Feasibility Study The study “on the available technology at the time showed that electronic monitoring was only effective in 26 % of urban areas and 19% of the rural areas in the country due to reliance on electricity and telephone lines” The current Department of Correctional Services position is informed by new technological evolution including Global Positioning System and Global System for Mobile Communications HISTORICAL BACKGROUND

7. Slide 7 Electronic monitoring can be employed to assist in monitoring the following categories of persons; Probationers Parolees Offenders with Fines Awaiting Trial Detainees (with or without Bail) Day Parolees Offenders Delivering Services to communities Offenders on occasional leave WHY WILL DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES EMPLOY ELECTRONIC MONITORING

8. Slide 8 Why Will Department of Correctional Services Employ Electronic Monitoring Corresponding statistics DAILY AVERAGE NUMBER OF OFFENDERS SUBJECT TO COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS DURING JANUARY 2008 Correctional Supervision diversion options from Court8833 Conversions of incarceration into correctional supervision8069 Awaiting trial under supervision1532 Sub-total: Correctional Supervision18434 Parole Supervision33709 TOTAL 52143

9. Slide 9 SNAPSHOT OF OFFENDER POPULATION/COST Cost per person per day = +/-R123.00 DescriptionPopulationCost Per MonthCost Per Year ATD with Bail 1312250,034,186.00589,112,190.00 ATD without Bail 39622151,078,686.001,778,829,690.00 Sentenced Inmates in terms of Section 276(i) 21468,182,698.0096,344,670.00 Other Sentenced Inmates 109734418,415,742.004,926,507,930.00 Current Prison Population 164624627,711,312.007,390,794,480.00

10. Slide 10 Reduce corruption and intimidation of Department of Correctional Services officials Enhance family stability and community involvement in rehabilitation Reduce prison population Afford Department of Correctional Services personnel more time for rehabilitation Research indicates potential savings May be a favoured option by the judiciary WHY WILL DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES EMPLOY ELECTRONIC MONITORING

11. Slide 11 Basic system: A transmitter within anklet/bracelet attached to offender Emits signals to a field monitoring device connected to a Communication System/Control Room Field monitoring device register when offender moves outside of set boundaries / tamper with the equipment Field monitoring device send alert to central control room for response WHAT IS ELECTRONIC MONITORING AND HOW DOES IT WORK?

12. Slide 12 WHAT IS ELECTRONIC MONITORING AND HOW DOES IT WORK? Active monitoring system It is a system for monitoring an individual’s movement and compliance to time/location parameters 24/7/365 in real time. The unit is programmable to remember zones that are off-limits and areas where the offender is required to be at certain times

13. Slide 13 WHAT IS ELECTRONIC MONITORING AND HOW DOES IT WORK? Passive monitoring system It is also a system for monitoring an offender’s movement and compliance with time/location parameters 24/7/365. It continuously records location data throughout the day and is programmable to remember zones that are off limit. At given intervals, the recorded information is downloaded to verify compliance. Passive systems are usually cheaper than active systems and are ideal for applications that do not require immediate notification.

14. Slide 14 WHAT IS ELECTRONIC MONITORING AND HOW DOES IT WORK? An ankle bracelet with a radio transmitter as a component that works with a Field Monitoring Device connected to a home telephone line A transmodal (transfer through skin) alcohol testing device A mini breathalyzer, measuring the offender‘s breath alcohol content. The unit identifies the offender using voice verification. Active Global Positioning System that utilizes an ankle bracelet

15. Slide 15 EXAMPLES OF COUNTRIES WITH ELECTRONIC MONITORING Canada United Kingdom Australia New Zealand Singapore

16. Slide 16 Coverage and reach of ICT infrastructure Lack of electricity & telephone infrastructure Currently Department of Correctional Services does not have specific budget for implementation Offender stigmatisation arising from anklet / bracelet Public intolerance of people associated with criminal activities Lack of support systems & residential addresses where offender can be physically supervised Electronic Monitoring does not stop re-offending CHALLENGES

17. Slide 17 Partnership with CSIR Undertake Best Practice review Cost Benefit Analysis (equivalent of the Regulation 16 requirements) Complete the planning processes in time to allow for (inclusion in MTEF) budgeting for 2009/10 IMPLEMENTATION AND WAY FORWARD

18. Slide 18 Introduction to Central Services Branch Building a caring correctional system that truly belongs to all STATUS REPORT INMATE TRACKING Presentation to Portfolio Committee Date:04.03.2008

19. Slide 19 OBJECTIVES OF INMATE TRACKING 1.Decrease detention cycle time of Awaiting Trial Detainees. 2.Optimise the management of facilities and population. 3. Assist in security management within the detention facilities. 4.Support the following processes: Admissions, Releases, Roll Calls, Bail and Visitations within the broader IJS. 5.Support detainee scheduling processes.

20. Slide 20 BRIEF BACKGROUND The system’s main purpose is to provide electronic tracking, including the biometric identification and verification of Awaiting Trial Detainees, within a Correctional Center. The system was identified and sponsored by the Integrated Justice System Cluster 2 pilot sites (Durban Westville Medium A & JHB Medium A ) were identified. The system has been rolled out to both facilities at an initial value of R28m.

21. Slide 21 EVALUATION COMMITTEE MANDATE 1.The pilot project of the Inmate Tracking System had to be evaluated as per the Request for Proposal Tender Specification document. 2.The Commissioner sanctioned the appointment of the Inmate Tracking System pilot Evaluation Committee. 2.The Committee evaluated the function, efficiency and sustainability of the system

22. Slide 22 1.Johannesburg Medium A Correctional Centre: a.Fully operational as per the tender specification and has proved to be successful in many areas as per the tender specifications, despite the challenges noted. 2.Durban Medium A Correctional Centre: a.The biometric identity verification functionality is being fully utilised and is of great value to the Correctional Centre. b.Mismanagement of stock and some of the PTDs were lost EVALUATION FINDINGS

23. Slide 23 FINDINGS OF THE INVESTIGATION INTO MISSING PTDS Findings The then Area Commissioner was not cooperative with investigations 3236 PTDs unaccounted for (R2,7m) Some were discovered after investigation Recommendations Unaccounted PTDs be written off No one be held accountable – inmates doings Disciplinary steps be taken against Area Commissioner

24. Slide 24 1.The Inmate Tracking System at JHB Med A satisfies the project objectives – proven to be valuable and beneficial. 2.The identity verification functionality is readily deployable to other Correctional Centres & can be used independent of the broader Inmate Tracking System. 3.The Inmate Tracking System generates added value spin- offs, not only in terms of the ATDs but can also be utilized with sentenced offenders. 4.The PTDs used are inefficient, non-durable, bulky and therefore unsustainable 5.Involvement of local management and staff critical for effective roll-out of the project 6.Component suppliers and procurement difficult to manage EVALUATION FINDINGS

25. Slide 25 1.The identity verification functionality be sustained at Durban & Johannesburg Medium A Correctional Centres. 2.The Inmate Tracking System project at JHB Med A Correctional Centre be extended for an additional 12 months with its full functionality, to bridge the identified gaps 3.Roll-out the Identity verification to 11 centres with higher ATD population 4.Develop local prototype of personal tracking device RECOMMENDATIONS

26. Slide 26 CURRENT STATUS Personal Tracking Device Development A User Requirements Specification has been completed for both the Development of the Prototype and the Integration of the Biometrics Identification and Verification Mechanism into the A&R. SITA is finalizing requirements for the Magic software and the tender process will ensue before the end of the financial year

27. Slide 27 CURRENT STATUS Identity Verification Roll-out The sites identified and correspond with the MATD project (and video arraignment) sites Roll-out awaits completion of integration and upgrade of A&R

28. Slide 28  Integrate Biometric Identity verification into A&R and RDOMS completed  Roll out ID verification to 11 big sites – beginning of new financial year  Testing new prototype for new generation PTDs in Jo’burg Medium A WAYFORWARD

29. Slide 29 THANK YOU Renewing our Pledge: A National Partnership to Correct, Rehabilitate and Reintegrate Offenders for a safer and secure South Africa