Presentation on theme: "Location Monitoring Program in the Federal Courts"— Presentation transcript:
1Location Monitoring Program in the Federal Courts National Update: Monograph 113 approved by CLC and is pending Judicial Conference approval; features new name change to Location Monitoring Program and emphasizes 24/7 role of supervising EM cases and responding to key alerts
2Who Am I? Trent Cornish, Probation Administrator Office of Probation and Pretrial ServicesAdministrative Office of the U.S. Courts(202)George – Innovator in the world of EM, and not just GPS but in his overall oversight of the program.
3Principles of Location Monitoring Program Manage or mitigate offender risks such as the risk an offender poses to a specific person or the communityTechnology provides capability to enforce and monitor offender’s compliance with one or more condition of supervision
4Principles of Location Monitoring Program (cont.) Verify approved offender locations at home or in the community; and/or provide information about the offender’s movement in the communityDetermine offender movement into prohibited areasLocation monitoring mitigates risk by establishing 24/7 accountability
5Types of Location Monitoring Technology in U.S. Courts Voice RecognitionRadio Frequency (RF)Passive GPSActive GPSHybrid GPSExclusion and Inclusion Zones to include Victim Mobile ZonesDiscuss some of the consistent finding at Program Reviews in the LM Program – some best practices and some policy but today we will primarily talk about best practices as it relates to program oversight. Discuss some of the common LM related finding at Program ReviewsThere have been some serious defendant / offender incidents in the EM program and it’s important to recognize that LM can’t prevent any “incident” but can mitigate / reduce risks. After an incident, the program is scrutinized and you want to be able to say we were doing everything we could to ensure that this would not happen. When it becomes a problem is when scrutinized, it appears there were some deficiencies in your program.Most important part of the overall program is the oversight itself. Ensuring that officers who supervise LM cases are consistently responding to alerts, documenting their efforts and that their work is being reviewed sufficiently.The purpose of this discussion is not to train or educate you on the program, but to identify ways to increaese program accountability and integrity and provide some tips to take back to your supervisors who are the key to a successful program.
6Availability in U.S. Courts Two national Location Monitoring Contracts (B.I. and G4S Justice)All technologies provided by both vendorsCourts may order services from either vendor and de-centralized funding is provided in their law enforcement accountsTraining provided by vendorsTraining is available through the EM contracts – yearly, refreshers, and training on new equipment – Most districts don’t take the contractors up on this.Any officer who handles an LM case, should be sufficiently trained. Often, we see that general line officers who handle 1-2 cases aren’t trained or knowledgeable in the technology.Back-ups: Make sure your backups are trained. Most incidents where a case has fallen through the cracks involves a breakdown during the back up coverage process. Make sure expectations of the back-up are clear and their role when they supervise is no different than the primary EM officer – not just clear alerts, but investigate and respond and document efforts. Again, program reviews show little documentation of back up effortsSupervisors must be trained and knowledgeable and it is recommended that they occasionally carry the pager or serve as back-up.
7Role of Office of Probation and Pretrial Services (OPPS) Develop national location monitoring policy (Monograph 113 – The Federal Location Monitoring Program for Defendants and Offenders)Program management and oversightEstablish requirements for national programAmend contracts with new technologies after period of testingVendor Mg. Reports are underutilized. These are reports that managers should be accessing on a daily basis to manage officer’s performance.Both statistical / administrative reports and activity reports are available through all contracts but rarely are they utilized.Vendors will also customize reports or establish various protocols via alerts to supervisors to notify them of a certain action. (e.g. installation complete, key alert that “times out” w/out a response.Request full list of reports and definitions, just give me a call or me.Review types of reports and benefit
8How is Location Monitoring Technology Utilized? Type of technology recommended and/or selected on a case by case basisType of technology selected based on sentence and identified risk factorsType of technology may change during course of supervision from least to more restrictive or vice versa depending on offender’s supervision adjustment
9Voice Verification Systems Automated systems place and/or receive calls to verify offender’s presenceCost – approximately $1.88 per dayNo traditional electronic monitoring equipment requiredMust consider minimum standards of Monograph 113: monthly field contacts, 24/7 alert responses and for GPS cases, number of exclusion zonesLMP Working Group recommendation: cases with maximum 10% GPS cases
10Voice VerificationTargets lower risk offenders by establishing random call-in times to verify presence in homeNot continuous monitoringPrimarily utilized for curfew monitoringAverage cost – $1.65 per day
11Radio Frequency (RF)Presence verified at authorized location (home) utilizing transmitter and receiver; monitored via land lineOnly monitors offender when in home (e.g. Martha Stewart)Approximately 5,500 defendants/offenders monitored via RF technology
12Radio Frequency Technology Ideal for continuous curfew monitoring in the homeCost-effective technology for monitoring offenders on “lock-down” status in homeAverage cost - $3.50 per day
13Global Positioning Systems (GPS) Records offender’s location from the time he/she leaves residence until return homeActive GPS – continuous monitoring in “real-time”Passive GPS – Tracking / location information downloaded upon offender’s return home; not “real-time”
14GPSIdeal for monitoring offender with condition that includes prohibited area in community (e.g. schools, victims, etc.)Ideal for monitoring offender who is required to be at specific location in community (e.g. place of employment, drug treatment, etc.)Can be used as supervision tool to look at “tracks” of movement to determine location patterns
15GPSApproximately 400 defendants/offenders being monitored via GPS technology in Federal CourtsLabor-intensive technology requiring considerable manpower – probation officer resourcesAverage cost - $6-9 per day
16Alert Notification System Alerts are generated directly to probation officer in various waysAlerts received via notification, voice via cell phone and/or text or any combination
17Types of Alerts Potential Violations Unauthorized LeaveFailure to ReturnEquipment TamperUnit Failed to ReportExclusion Zone ViolationInclusion Zone ViolationBracelet Gone / Transmitter Out of Range
18Alert Response Protocol All “key” alerts must be investigated and responded to on a 24/7 basisMajority of alerts are innocuous and not indicative of a violation (e.g. no GPS signal, land-line out of service, etc.)
19Location Monitoring Violations Violations must be based on officer’s independent investigation and not solely based on information (alert) generated by location monitoring technology
20Location Monitoring Technology as an Alternative to Incarceration Technology provides officer with ability to mitigate risks that offenders pose in the community that could not otherwise be addressedTechnology provides ability to enforce an offender’s structured schedule that can fulfill sentencing objectivesProvides ability to verify offender location and add layer of structure to offender’s activities
21Future Location Monitoring Technology Real-time Transdermal Alcohol Testing – via Active GPS TrackingOne-piece “Hybrid” Tracking – combines all technologies into one tracking unit (RF, GPS, etc.)AFLT Technology – Advanced Forward Link TrilaterationTelevision Tracking Technology